Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T21:24:52.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Astrometry and Galactic Structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2016

S.R. Majewski*
Affiliation:
The Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, 813 Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, CA 91101, U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The application of astrometric surveys to understanding the structure and kinematics of the Milky Way is discussed, with particular emphasis on some of the issues expected to be addressed in the next decade or so. It is shown that the results of complete proper motion surveys of field stars at the Galactic poles are in remarkable agreement concerning the global kinematics of stars as a function of distance, but that significant differences exist in how these data are decomposed to derive the kinematics of individual Galactic components. The status and future prospects regarding the measurement of proper motions and orbits for Galactic globular clusters and satellites are also discussed.

Type
Part Nine: Galactic Structure
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1994 

References

Allen, C., Schuster, W.J. and Poveda, A., 1991. Astron. Astrophys., 244, 280.Google Scholar
Bahcall, J.N., Schmidt, M. and Soneira, R.M., 1983. Astrophys. J., 265, 730.Google Scholar
Brosche, P., Tucholke, H.-J., Klemola, A.R., Ninkovic, S., Geffert, M. and Doerenkamp, P., 1991. Astron. J., 102, 2022.Google Scholar
Carney, B.W., Aguilar, L., Latham, D.W. and Laird, J.W., 1990. Astron. J., 99, 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casertano, S., Ratnatunga, K.U. and Bahcall, J.N., 1990. Astrophys. J., 357, 435.Google Scholar
Chiu, L.-T., 1980. Astrophys. J. Suppl., 44, 31.Google Scholar
Cudworth, K.M., 1993. In ‘Galaxy Evolution: The Milky Way Perspective’, ASP Conf. Ser. 49, ed. Majewski, S.R., ASP San Francisco, p. 141.Google Scholar
Cudworth, K.M. and Hanson, R.B., 1993. Astron. J., 105, 168.Google Scholar
Cudworth, K.M., Takamiya, M., Majewski, S.R. and Peterson, R., 1993. B.A.A.S., 25, 885.Google Scholar
Eggen, O.J., Lynden-Bell, D. and Sandage, A.R., 1962. Astrophys. J., 136, 748.Google Scholar
Guo, X., Girard, T.M., van Altena, W.F. and López, C.E., 1993a. Astron. J., 105, 2182.Google Scholar
Guo, X., Girard, T.M., van Altena, W.F. and López, C.E., 1993b. In ‘Galactic and Solar System Optical Astrometry’, in press.Google Scholar
Hanson, R.B., 1989. B.A.A.S., 21, 1107.Google Scholar
Kapteyn, J.C., 1906. ‘Plan of Selected Areas’, Astronomical Laboratory, Groningen.Google Scholar
Kapteyn, J.C., 1911. ‘First and Second Reports on the Progress of the Plan of Selected Areas’, Astronomical Laboratory, Groningen.Google Scholar
Klemola, A.R., Jones, B.F. and Hanson, R.B., 1987. Astron. J., 94, 501.Google Scholar
Kunkel, W.E., 1979. Astrophys. J., 228, 718.Google Scholar
Kunkel, W.E. and Demers, S., 1976. R. Greenwich Obs. Bull., 182, 241.Google Scholar
Lattanzi, M.G., Spagna, A., Lasker, B.M., Massone, G., McLean, B., Bucciarelli, B. and Postman, M., 1993. In ‘Galactic and Solar System Optical Astrometry’, in press.Google Scholar
Lin, D.N.C., 1993. B.A.A.S., 25, 783.Google Scholar
Lin, D.N.C. and Richer, H.B., 1992. Astrophys. J. Lett., 388, L57.Google Scholar
Lynden-Bell, D., 1982. The Observatory, 102, 202.Google Scholar
Majewski, S.R., 1992. Astrophys. J. Suppl., 78, 87.Google Scholar
Majewski, S.R., 1993. ARAA, 31, 575.Google Scholar
Majewski, S.R., 1994. Astrophys. J. Lett., submitted.Google Scholar
Majewski, S.R. and Cudworth, K.M., 1993. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific, 105, 987.Google Scholar
Murray, C.A., 1986. Mon. Not. R. astron. Soc., 223, 649.Google Scholar
Nemec, J. and Nemec, A.F.L., 1991. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific, 103, 95.Google Scholar
Reid, I.N., 1990. Mon. Not. R. astron. Soc., 247, 70.Google Scholar
Robin, A. and Crézé, M., 1986. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl., 64, 53.Google Scholar
Rodgers, A.W. and Paltoglou, G., 1984. Astrophys. J. Lett., 283, L5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholz, R.-D., Odenkirchen, M. and Irwin, M.J., 1993. Mon. Not. R. astron. Soc., 264, 579.Google Scholar
Schuster, W.J. and Nissen, P.E., 1988. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl., 73, 225.Google Scholar
Schweizer, A., Cudworth, K.M. and Majewski, S.R., 1993. In ‘The Globular Cluster — Galaxy Connection’, ASP Conf. Series 48, eds. Smith, G. and Brodie, J., ASP San Francisco, p. 113.Google Scholar
Searle, L. and Zinn, R., 1978. Astrophys. J., 225, 357.Google Scholar
Soubiran, C., 1993. Astron. Astrophys., 274, 181.Google Scholar
Spaenhauer, A., 1989. Contrib. Van Vleck Obs., 9, 45.Google Scholar
van Altena, W.F., Girard, T., López, C.E., López, J.A. and Molina, E., 1990. In ‘Inertial Coordinate System on the Sky’, IAU Symp. 141, eds. Lieske, J.H. and Abalakin, V.K., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p. 419.Google Scholar
van den Bergh, S., 1993. Astron. J., 105, 971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Rhijn, P.J., 1923. ‘Third Report on the Progress of the Plan of Selected Areas’, Astronomical Laboratory, Groningen.Google Scholar
Zinn, R., 1985. Astrophys. J., 293, 424.Google Scholar
Zinn, R., 1993. In ‘The Globular Cluster — Galaxy Connection’, ASP Conf. Ser. 48, eds. Smith, G. and Brodie, J., ASP San Francisco, p. 38.Google Scholar