Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:51:00.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early days of Planetary Nebular theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

Lawrence H. Aller
Lawrence H. Aller*
Affiliation:
UCLA Physics and Astronomy-Astronomy Division

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The spectra of gaseous nebulae differed strikingly from those of stars which were well understood since 1922 thanks to the work of Saha. Gaseous nebulae exhibited exotic bright line spectra characterized by strange emissions of unknown origin as well as familiar lines of hydrogen and helium. The strongest lines in most nebulae fell at 4959A and 5007A. They were originally attributed to an unknown element. First came the interpretation of the lines of H.

Type
I. Introduction
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 180: Planetary Nebulae , 1997 , pp. 3 - 9
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1997 

References

Aller, L.H. and Menzel, D.H. 1945, ApJ. 102, 239.Google Scholar
Aller, L.H., Ufford, W., and VanVleck, J.H. 1949, ApJ. 109, 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, J.G. and Menzel, D.H. 1938, ApJ. 88, 52.Google Scholar
Baker, J.G., Menzel, D.H., and Aller, L.H. 1938, ApJ. 88, 422.Google Scholar
Bowen, I.S. 1928, ApJ., 67, 1935, ApJ. 88, 115.Google Scholar
Bowen, I.S. and Wyse, A.B. 1939, Lick Obs. Bull 19, 1.Google Scholar
Bohm, D. and Aller, L.H. 1947, ApJ. 105, 1.Google Scholar
Carroll, J.A. 1930, MNRAS. 90, 588.Google Scholar
Cillie, G. 1932, MNRAS. 92, 820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagihara, Y. 1941, Tokyo Astr. Bull. 542, 571.Google Scholar
Hebb, M.H. and Menzel, D.H. 1940, ApJ. 92, 408.Google Scholar
Liller, W. and Aller, L.H. 1954, ApJ. 120, 48.Google Scholar
MacRae, D. and Stock, J. 1954, Nature 173, 589.Google Scholar
Menzel, D.H. and Aller, L.H. 1941a, ApJ. 94, 30 1941b, ApJ. 94, 438.Google Scholar
Menzel, D.H. and Baker, J.G. 1937, ApJ. 86, 70.Google Scholar
Menzel, D.H, Aller, L.H., and Baker, J.G. 1938, ApJ. 88, 313.Google Scholar
Minkowski, R. and Aller, L.H. 1954, ApJ. 120, 261.Google Scholar
Pasternack, S. 1940, ApJ. 92, 129.Google Scholar
Plaskett, H.H. 1928, Harvard Circular #335.Google Scholar
Seaton, M.J. 1953, Ann d'Ap. 17, 74 1954, MNRAS. 118, 154.Google Scholar
Shklovsky, J.S. 1956, AJ. (U.S.S.R) 33, 222, 315.Google Scholar
Shortley, G., Aller, L.H., Baker, J.G., and Menzel, D.H. 1941, ApJ. 98, 178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, J. 1930, Phys. Rev. 57, 36.Google Scholar
Stevenson, A.F. 1932, Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser A, 137, 298.Google Scholar
Wyse, A.B. 1942, ApJ. 95, 356.Google Scholar
Zanstra, H. 1926, Phys. Rev.(2) 27, 64.Google Scholar