Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T06:36:55.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing: Status & Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2016

Tereasa G. Brainerd
Tereasa G. Brainerd*
Affiliation:
Boston University, Department of Astronomy, 725 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

There are now 10 independent observational investigations which have detected systematic weak gravitational lensing of background field galaxies by foreground field galaxies. This effect, known as galaxy-galaxy lensing, results in a very slight (of order 1%) distortion to the intrinsic image shapes of the lensed galaxies. Although small, the galaxy-galaxy lensing signal is coherent about the lens centers and is, therefore, detectable in large data sets via an ensemble average over many candidate pairs of lenses and sources. Here I summarize the results of the recent detections of galaxy-galaxy lensing and discuss some applications that are likely to be implemented in the very near future.

Type
Part VIII: Dark Matter and Ω0
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 201: New Cosmological Data and the Values of the Fundamental Parameters , 2005 , pp. 282 - 291
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2005 

References

Brainerd, T. G., Blandford, R. D. & Smail, I. 1996, ApJ, 466, 623.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. G., Hogg, D. W., Blandford, R. et al. 2000, ApJ, 538, 29.Google Scholar
Dell'Antonio, I. P. & Tyson, J. A. 1996, ApJ, 473, L17.Google Scholar
Dubinski, J. & Carlberg, R. G. 1991, ApJ, 378, 496.Google Scholar
Ebbels, T. 1998, PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fischer, R et al. (the SDSS collaboration), 2000, AJ, 120, 1198.Google Scholar
Geiger, B. & Schneider, P. 1999, MNRAS, 302, 118.Google Scholar
Griffiths, R. E., Casertano, S., Im, M. et al. 1996, MNRAS, 282, P1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, H., 2000, PhD Thesis, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Hudson, M. J., Gwyn, S. D. J., Dahle, H. & Kaiser, N. 1998, ApJ, 503, 531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaunsen, A. O. 2000, PhD Thesis, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Loveday, J., Maddox, S. J., Efstathiou, G. et al. 1995, ApJ, 442, 457.Google Scholar
Mellier, Y. 1999, ARA&A, 37, 127.Google Scholar
Kaiser, N. 1987, MNRAS, 227, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, N. 1992, ApJ, 388, 272.Google Scholar
Kneib, J.-P., Ellis, R. S., Smail, I. et al. 1996, ApJ, 471, 643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kormann, R., Schneider, P. & Bartelmann, M. 1994, AA, 284, 285.Google Scholar
Natarajan, P., Kneib, J. P. & Smail, I. 1998, ApJ, 499, 600.Google Scholar
Sackett, P. 1999, in Galaxy Dynamics , ASP Conf. Series 182, eds. Merritt, D. R., Valluri, M. & Sellwood, J. A., 393.Google Scholar
Smith, D., Bernstein, , et al. 2000, ApJ, submitted (astro-ph/0010071).Google Scholar
Tyson, J. A., Valdes, F., Jarvis, J. F. & Mills, A. P., 1984, ApJ, 281, L59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, M. S., Quinn, P. J., Salmon, J. K. & Zurek, W. H. 1992, ApJ, 399, 405.Google Scholar
Wilson, G., Kaiser, N. et al. 2000, ApJ, in press (astro-ph/0008504).Google Scholar