Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:08:06.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Interpretation of Magnetograph Results: The Formation of Absorption Lines in a Magnetic Field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

J. O. Stenflo*
Affiliation:
Astronomical Observatory, Lund, Sweden

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The theory of line formation in a magnetic field is reviewed. It is shown how the formulations by Unno, Beckers, Stepanov and Rachkovsky are related to each other. The general treatment of true absorption, anomalous dispersion, radiative scattering and level-crossing interference is discussed. Special attention is paid to the inhomogeneous nature of the solar atmosphere. The properties of magnetic filaments are reviewed. It is shown how a filamentary structure will drastically influence the interpretation of magnetograph observations. The treatment of line formation in a turbulent magnetic field is also discussed.

The fine structure of the solar atmosphere will influence different types of magnetographs in entirely different ways. The relation between the observed magnetic field and the resolution of the instrument is discussed for a Babcock-type, Evans-type and a transversal magnetograph. Finally some suggestions for future work in this field are listed.

Type
Part II: The Interpretation of Magnetograph Results – The Formation of Absorption Lines in a Magnetic Field
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1971 

References

Alfvén, H.: 1952, Arkiv Fysik 4, 407.Google Scholar
Alfvén, H.: 1967, in Magnetism and the Cosmos (ed. by Hindmarsh, , Lowes, , Roberts, , and Runcorn, ), Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh/London, p. 246.Google Scholar
Alfvén, H. and Lehnert, B.: 1956, Nature 178, 1339.Google Scholar
Ambartsumian, V. A.: 1943, Dokl. Akad. Nauk S.S.S.R. 38, No. 8.Google Scholar
Beckers, J. M.: 1969a, Solar Phys. 9, 372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckers, J. M.: 1969b, Solar Phys. 10, 262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckers, J. M. and Schröter, E. H.: 1968a, Solar Phys. 4, 142.Google Scholar
Beckers, J. M. and Schröter, E. H.: 1968b, Solar Phys. 4, 165.Google Scholar
Beckers, J. M. and Schröter, E. H.: 1968c, Solar Phys. 4, 303.Google Scholar
Born, M.: 1965, Optik , 2nd ed., Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breit, G.: 1925, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 10, 439.Google Scholar
Breit, G.: 1932, Rev. Mod. Phys. 4, 504.Google Scholar
Breit, G.: 1933, Rev. Mod. Phys. 5, 91.Google Scholar
Chandrasekhar, S.: 1950, Radiative Transfer , Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Chandrasekhar, S.: 1955, Proc. Roy. Soc. London 233, 322 and 390.Google Scholar
Chapman, G. A. and Sheeley, N. R. Jr.: 1968, Solar Phys. 5, 442.Google Scholar
Dirac, P. A. M.: 1927a, Proc. Roy. Soc. London 114, 710.Google Scholar
Dirac, P. A. M.: 1927b, Proc. Roy. Soc. London 114, 243.Google Scholar
Domke, H.: 1969a, Astrofiz 5, 525.Google Scholar
Domke, H.: 1969b, Monatsber. Deut. Akad. Wiss. Berlin 11, 269.Google Scholar
Evans, J. C.: 1968, Report at the MASUA Theoretical Physics Conference , University of Nebraska, Nov. 2-3, 1968.Google Scholar
Evans, J. C.: 1969a, Report at the Special Meeting on Solar Astronomy of the AAS , Pasadena, Febr. 18-21, 1969.Google Scholar
Evans, J. C.: 1969b, Report at the IAU Symposium on Laboratory Astrophysics , York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Nov. 7-8, 1969.Google Scholar
Evans, J. C. and Dreiling, L. A.: 1969, Report at the 130th Meeting of the AAS, State University of New York , Albany, New York, Aug. 11–14, 1969.Google Scholar
Evans, J. W.: 1964, in Atti del Convegno sui Campi Magnetici Solari (ed. by Barbèra, G.), Firenze.Google Scholar
Fitremann, M. and Frisch, U.: 1969, Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris 268, 705.Google Scholar
Gussman, E. A.: 1967, Z. Astrophys. 65, 456.Google Scholar
Hamilton, D. R.: 1947, Astrophys. J. 106, 457.Google Scholar
Hanle, W.: 1924, Z. Phys. 30, 93.Google Scholar
Harvey, J. and Livingston, W.: 1969, Solar Phys. 10, 283.Google Scholar
House, L. L.: 1970a, J. Quant. Spectr. Radiative Transfer 10, 909.Google Scholar
House, L. L.: 1970b, J. Quant. Spectr. Radiative Transfer 10, 1171.Google Scholar
House, L. L.: 1971, J. Quant. Spectr. Radiative Transfer 11, 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, R. and Bhatnagar, A.: 1969, Solar Phys. 10, 245.Google Scholar
Hyder, C. L.: 1968, Solar Phys. 5, 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kai, K.: 1968, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan 20, 154.Google Scholar
Kaplan, S. A.: 1958, in Electromagnetic Phenomena in Cosmical Physics (ed. by Lehnert, B.), Cambridge University Press, p. 504.Google Scholar
Kraichnan, R. H. and Nagarajan, S.: 1967, Phys. Fluids 10, 859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, F. K.: 1970, Solar Phys. 12, 186.Google Scholar
Leighton, R. B.: 1965, in Lüst, R. (ed.), ‘Stellar and Solar Magnetic Fields’, IAU Symp. 22, 158.Google Scholar
Livingston, W.: 1968, Astrophys. J. 153, 929.Google Scholar
Livingston, W. and Harvey, J.: 1969, Solar Phys. 10, 294.Google Scholar
Mattig, W.: 1966, in Atti del Convegno sulle Macchie Solari (ed. by Barbèra, G.), Firenze.Google Scholar
Moe, O. K.: 1968, Solar Phys. 4, 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, O. K. and Maltby, P.: 1968, Astrophys. Letters 1, 189.Google Scholar
Nagarajan, S.: 1970, Phys. Fluids , in press.Google Scholar
Nagarajan, S.: 1971, this volume, p. 487.Google Scholar
Obridko, V. N.: 1965a, Astron. Zh. 42, 102.Google Scholar
Obridko, V. N.: 1965b, Astron. Zh. 42, 502.Google Scholar
Obridko, V. N.: 1968, Soln. Aktivnostj No. 3, 64.Google Scholar
Rachkovsky, D. N.: 1961a, Izv. Krymsk. Astrofiz. Obs. 25, 277.Google Scholar
Rachkovsky, D. N.: 1961b, Izv. Krymsk. Astrofiz. Obs. 26, 63.Google Scholar
Rachkovsky, D. N.: 1962a, Izv. Krymsk. Astrofiz. Obs. 27, 148.Google Scholar
Rachkovsky, D. N.: 1962b, Izv. Krymsk. Astrofiz. Obs. 28, 259.Google Scholar
Rachkovsky, D. N.: 1963a, Izv. Krymsk. Astrofiz. Obs. 29, 97.Google Scholar
Rachkovsky, D. N.: 1963b, Izv. Krymsk. Astrofiz. Obs. 30, 267.Google Scholar
Rachkovsky, D. N.: 1965, Izv. Krymsk. Astrofiz. Obs. 33, 111.Google Scholar
Rachkovsky, D. N.: 1967a, Izv. Krymsk. Astrofiz. Obs. 36, 3.Google Scholar
Rachkovsky, D. N.: 1967b, Izv. Krymsk. Astrofiz. Obs. 36, 9.Google Scholar
Rachkovsky, D. N.: 1967c, Izv. Krymsk. Astrofiz. Obs. 36, 51.Google Scholar
Rachkovsky, D. N.: 1967d, Izv. Krymsk. Astrofiz. Obs. 37, 56.Google Scholar
Rees, D. E.: 1969, Solar Phys. 10, 268.Google Scholar
Semel, M.: 1962, Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris. 254, 3978.Google Scholar
Severny, A. B.: 1964, Izv. Krymsk. Astrofiz. Obs. 31, 126.Google Scholar
Severny, A. B.: 1965, Izv. Krymsk. Astrofiz. Obs. 33, 3.Google Scholar
Sheeley, N. R. Jr.: 1967, Solar Phys. 1, 171.Google Scholar
Staude, J.: 1970a, Solar Phys. 12, 84.Google Scholar
Staude, J.: 1970b, Solar Phys. 15, 102.Google Scholar
Stenflo, J. O.: 1966a, Observatory 86, 73.Google Scholar
Stenflo, J. O.: 1966b, Arkiv. Astron. 4, 173.Google Scholar
Stenflo, J. O.: 1968a, Acta Univ. Lund. II No. 1 (= Medd. Lunds Astron. Obs. Ser. II Nr: 152).Google Scholar
Stenflo, J. O.: 1968b, Acta Univ. Lund. II No. 2 (= Medd. Lunds Astron. Obs. Ser. II Nr: 153).Google Scholar
Stenflo, J. O.: 1969, Solar Phys. 8, 260.Google Scholar
Stepanov, V. E.: 1958a, Izv. Krymsk. Astrofiz. Obs. 18, 136.Google Scholar
Stepanov, V. E.: 1958b, Izv. Krymsk. Astrofiz. Obs. 19, 20.Google Scholar
Stepanov, V. E.: 1960a, Izv. Krymsk. Astrofiz. Obs. 23, 291.Google Scholar
Stepanov, V. E.: 1960b, Izv. Krymsk. Astrofiz. Obs. 24, 293.Google Scholar
Stepanov, V. E.: 1960c, Astron. Zh. 37, 631.Google Scholar
Stepanov, V. E.: 1962, Izv. Krymsk. Astrofiz. Obs. 27, 140.Google Scholar
Stepanov, V. E. and Severny, A. B.: 1962, Izv. Krymsk. Astrofiz. Obs. 28, 166.Google Scholar
Steshenko, N. V.: 1960, Izv. Krymsk. Astrofiz. Obs. 22, 49.Google Scholar
Unno, W.: 1956, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan 8, 108.Google Scholar
Unno, W.: 1959, Astrophys. J. 129, 375.Google Scholar
Weisskopf, V.: 1931, Ann. Phys. 9, 23.Google Scholar
Wiehr, E.: 1970, Solar Phys. 11, 399.Google Scholar
Wood, R. W. and Ellett, A.: 1924, Phys. Rev. 24, 243.Google Scholar