Hostname: page-component-669899f699-swprf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-28T23:03:06.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Magnetic Braking and Angular Momenta of Protostars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2017

Telemachos Ch. Mouschovias
Telemachos Ch. Mouschovias*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Departments of Physics and Astronomy

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A contracting, typical, isothermal interstellar cloud or fragment, magnetically linked to the surrounding medium, loses angular momentum so efficiently that it remains in nearly synchronous galactocentric orbit as long as the field is frozen in the matter. At a high enough density ndec, the field decouples from the matter due to ambipolar diffusion. Thereafter angular momentum is essentially conserved and, consequently, there is a one-to-one correspondence between ndec and the angular momenta of binary and single stars that can ultimately form. Although the calculated rotational velocities (typically, 100 km/sec) are not yet refined enough to account for peculiarities among different spectral classes which may be due to phenomena following protostar formation, they are encouragingly consistent with observations.

Type
V. Stellar Winds and Spindown in Late — Type Stars
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 102: Solar and Stellar Magnetic Fields: Origins and Coronal Effects , 1983 , pp. 479 - 485
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1983 

References

Abt, H.A. and Levy, S.G.: 1976, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 30, p. 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, C.W.: 1974, “Astrophysical Quantities” (Athlone Press, London).Google Scholar
Mestel, L.: 1965, Quart. J. Roy. Astron. Soc. 6, p. 265.Google Scholar
Mestel, L. and Spitzer, L. Jr.: 1956, Monthly Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 116, p. 503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouschovias, T. Ch.: 1976a, Astrophys. J. 206, p. 753.Google Scholar
Mouschovias, T. Ch.: 1976b, Astrophys. J. 207, p. 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouschovias, T. Ch.: 1977, Astrophys. J. 211, p. 147.Google Scholar
Mouschovias, T. Ch.: 1978a, Astrophys. J. 224, p. 283.Google Scholar
Mouschovias, T. Ch.: 1978b, in “Protostars and Planets”, ed. Gehrels, T. (University of Arizona Press, Tucson), pp. 209–242.Google Scholar
Mouschovias, T. Ch.: 1981, in “Fundamental Problems in the Theory of Stellar Evolution”, eds. Sugimoto, D., Lamb, D.Q., and Schramm, D.N. (Reidel, Boston), pp. 27–59.Google Scholar
Mouschovias, T. Ch.: 1982, Advances in Space Research, in press.Google Scholar
Mouschovias, T. Ch.: 1983, Astrophys. J., to be submitted.Google Scholar
Mouschovias, T. Ch. and Paleologou, E.V.: 1979, Astrophys. J. 230, 204.Google Scholar
Mouschovias, T. Ch. and Paleologou, E.V.: 1980a, Moon Planets 22, p. 31.Google Scholar
Mouschovias, T. Ch. and Paleologou, E.V.: 1980b, Astrophys. J. 237, p. 877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakano, T.: 1979, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan 31, p. 697.Google Scholar
Nakano, T. and Tademaru, E.: 1972, Astrophys. J. 173, p. 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitzer, L. Jr.: 1978, “Physical Processes in the Interstellar Medium” (Wiley-Interscience, New York).Google Scholar
Vogel, S.N. and Kuhi, L.V.: 1981, Astrophys. J. 245, p. 960.Google Scholar
Wolff, S.C., Edwards, S., and Preston, G.W.: 1982, Astrophys. J. 252, p. 322.Google Scholar