The distribution of orbits in the satellite systems of the major planets is definitely nonrandom as there is a marked preference for commensurability among pairs of mean motions in these systems. If this preference is not the result of a formation process then it follows that since the time of satellite formation dynamical evolution has occurred. In this paper (a full version of which is to be submitted to another journal) I show that there is a bulk of evidence in favour of the hypothesis that orbital evolution has occurred as the result of tidal dissipation in the planets. This evidence can be listed as follows:

(i) In a tidally evolved satellite system there should be a linear correlation between log (orbital radius) and log (satellite mass). The expected correlation is observed among the inner satellites of Saturn and Uranus, the slope of the log-log plots being consistent with an amplitude and frequency independent Q (the tidal dissipation function). The correlation in Saturn's system must be largely due to either a formation process or possibly an early amplitude and frequency dependent tidal process, but certainly the present satellite distribution is completely consistent with the tidal hypothesis.

(ii) If Q is amplitude- and frequency-independent then the Mimas-Tethys and Enceladus-Dione resonances are stable under the action of tidal forces. This is an important result as it indicates that the necessary tidal dissipation occurred in the solid parts of the planets. Whether or not these planets have any solid parts at present is a matter of dispute.

(iii) The tidal hypothesis can account for the formation (capture into libration) of the Mimas-Tethys and Enceladus-Dione resonances.

(iv) If it is allowed that the age of the Mimas-Tethys resonance is not small (> 108 yr) in comparison with that of the solar system and that orbital evolution since the time of satellite formation has been appreciable then it can be shown that tidal forces (with Q amplitude- and frequency-independent) can account for the present large amplitude of libration of this resonance.

(v) If tidal evolution in the satellite systems of Jupiter and Saturn has been appreciable then from the present orbits of Io and Mimas it can be deduced that Q (Jupiter) ~1.1 × 105 and Q (Saturn) ~1.2 × 105. As the masses of the two satellites differ by a factor ~2000 and the amplitudes of the tides they raise on their respective planets differ by a factor ~ 5000 this agreement in the Q-values is somewhat remarkable. But as the stability of the Mimas-Tethys and Enceladus-Dione resonances demands that Q is amplitude- and frequency-independent and as the chemical compositions and structures of Jupiter and Saturn are probably similar then one should expect the Q's of these planets to be similar and thus the result supports the tidal hypothesis.

(vi) Finally, as the values of Q are so very high it would be remarkable if tidal evolution had not taken place.