Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:10:09.463Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Star formation: relationship between the maser species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2017

Jim L. Caswell
Jim L. Caswell*
Affiliation:
Australia Telescope National Facility, CSIRO, PO Box 76, Epping, NSW 2121, Australia

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Masers in Star Formation Regions arise chiefly from the molecules of methanol, hydroxyl, and water; in the case of methanol and hydroxyl, masing transitions are numerous. Exploring the relationship between the maser species (and their relationship to any associated ultracompact HII region detectable at radio wavelengths) can be made at two levels: first, at the general level, assessing whether the occurrence together of some species, and the absence of others, reveals significant properties of the site as a whole; second, at a deeper level, to assess whether the masing spots are coincident in both velocity and space.

The first may be used as a diagnostic of the evolutionary state of the embedded young massive star. The second reveals physical conditions.

New studies relevant to these issues are discussed here. Substantial unbiased surveys of the major masing transitions are especially valuable in allowing a more effective interpretation of existing targeted observations.

Type
Part 1. Star Formation
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 206: Cosmic Masers: From Protostars to Blackholes , 2002 , pp. 1 - 13
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2002 

References

Anderson, N., Genzel, R., 1992 in Astrophysical Masers, Proceedings, Arlington, Virginia. ed Clegg, A.W. & Nedoluha, G.E. (Lecture Notes in Physics v412 Springer Verlag), 97 Google Scholar
Argon, A.L., Reid, M.J., & Menten, K.M. 2000, ApJSuppl, 129, 159 Google Scholar
Caswell, J.L. 1996, MNRAS, 279, 79 Google Scholar
Caswell, J.L. 1997, MNRAS, 289, 203 Google Scholar
Caswell, J.L. 1998, MNRAS, 297, 215 Google Scholar
Caswell, J.L. 1999, MNRAS, 308, 683 Google Scholar
Caswell, J.L. & Haynes, R.F., 1987, Aust. J. Phys., 40, 215 Google Scholar
Caswell, J.L. & Vaile, R.A., 1995, MNRAS, 273, 328 Google Scholar
Caswell, J.L. & Reynolds, J.E., 2001, MNRAS (in press).Google Scholar
Caswell, J.L., Vaile, R.A., & Ellingsen, S.P. 1995, Pub. Astron. Soc. Aust., 12, 37 Google Scholar
Caswell, J.L., Yi, J., Booth, R.S., & Cragg, D.M. 2000, MNRAS, 313, 599 Google Scholar
Clegg, A.W. & Nedoluha, G.E. (eds) 1992, Astrophysical Masers, Proceedings, Arlington, Virginia. Lecture Notes in Physics v412 (Heidelberg: Springer Verlag)Google Scholar
Cragg, D.M., Sobolev, A.M., Ellingsen, S.P., Caswell, J.L., & Godfrey, P.D., Salii, S.V., Dodson, R.G. 2001, MNRAS, in press Google Scholar
Ellingsen, S.P., von Bibra, M.L., McCulloch, P.M., Norris, R.P., Deshpande, A.A., & Phillips, C.J. 1996, MNRAS, 280, 378 Google Scholar
Forster, J.R., Welch, W.J., & Wright, M.C.H. 1977, ApJ, 215, L121 Google Scholar
Forster, J.R. & Caswell, J.L. 1989, A&A, 213, 339 Google Scholar
Forster, J.R. & Caswell, J.L. 1999, A&ASuppl., 137, 43 Google Scholar
Forster, J.R. & Caswell, J.L. 2000, ApJ, 530, 371 Google Scholar
Hartquist, T.W., Menten, K.M., Lepp, S., & Dalgarno, A. 1995, MNRAS, 272, 184 Google Scholar
Masheder, M.R.W., Field, D., Gray, M.D., Migenes, V., Cohen, R.J., & Booth, R.S. 1994, A&A, 281, 871 Google Scholar
Matthews, H.E., Olnon, F.M., Winnberg, A., & Baud, B. 1935, A&A, 149, 227 Google Scholar
Menten, K.M. 1991, ApJ, 380, L75 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minier, V., Conway, J.E., & Booth, R.S. 2001, A&A, in press Google Scholar
Pavlakis, K.G. & Kylafis, N.D. 2000, ApJ, 534, 770 Google Scholar
Slysh, V.I., Kalenskii, S.V., & Val'tts, I.E. 1995, ApJ, 442, 668 Google Scholar
Smits, D.P. 1994, MNRAS, 269, L11 Google Scholar