Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T22:26:03.902Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Status of the Hubble Diagram In 1986

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2016

Hyron Spinrad  and
S. Djorgovski
Hyron Spinrad
Affiliation:
Astronomy Department University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
S. Djorgovski
Affiliation:
Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St. Cambridge, MA 02138, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present visual and near-infrared Hubble diagrams for first-ranked cluster galaxies, and moderate-flux and high-flux radio galaxies. The photometric improvements and the extension of the diagrams to large redshifts (up to z ≃ 1.8) for both 3CR and “1 Jy” class radio galaxies are highlighted. The absolute luminosities of these three types of “standard candles”, where their redshifts overlap, agree adequately. The near-IR (2μm) Hubble diagrams may be used to determine the global deceleration parameter, q0, and the current data favor q0 ∼ +0.2 to +0.3. The sensitivity to evolutionary changes in the giant galaxies is quite modest at these long wavelengths. On the other hand, the visual regime (BV R) shows a dramatic dependence on differential evolution effects, which dominate over the cosmological model differences. Most radio galaxies apparently have had active star formation, with a continually declining rate, but a few are quite faint and red; they may have had a relatively passive evolution.

Type
Chapter III. The Classical Quantities of Cosmology
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 124: Observational Cosmology , 1987 , pp. 129 - 141
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1987 

References

Allington-Smith, J. R., Lilly, S. J., and Longair, M.S. 1985, M.N.R.A.S. 213, 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruzual, G. 1983, Ap. J. 273, 105.Google Scholar
Bruzual, G. 1986, in Spectral Evolution of Galaxies, Chiosi, C. and Renzini, A. (eds.), p. 263. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, M. 1986, private communicaton.Google Scholar
Djorgovski, S., Spinrad, H., and Dickinson, M. 1987, Ap. J. (in press). [DSD] Google Scholar
Djorgovski, S., Spinrad, H., and Marr, J. 1985, in New Aspects of Galaxy Photometry, Nieto, J. L. (ed.), p. 193. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Grasdalen, G. 1980, in Objects of High Redshift, IAU Symposium #92, Abell, G. O. and Peebles, P. J. E. (eds.), p. 269. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Gunn, J. E., and Oke, J. B., 1975, Ap. J. 195, 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, J. E., Hoessel, J., and Oke, J. B. 1986, Ap. J. 306, 30.Google Scholar
Hamilton, D. 1985, Ap. J. 297, 371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoessel, J., Gunn, J. E., and Thuan, T. X. 1980, Ap. J. 241, 486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristian, J., Sandage, A. R., and Westphal, J. 1978, Ap. J. 221, 383.Google Scholar
Lebofsky, M. 1980 in Objects of High Redshift IAU Symposium #92, Abell, G. O. and Peebles, P. J. E. (eds.), p. 257. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Lebofsky, M. J. 1981 Ap. J. 245, L59.Google Scholar
Lebofsky, M. J., and Eisenhardt, P. R. M. 1986, Ap. J. 300, 151. [LE] Google Scholar
Lilly, S. J., and Longair, M. S. 1982, M.N.R.A.S. 199, 1053. [LL] Google Scholar
Lilly, S. J. 1983, , University of Edinburgh, UK.Google Scholar
Lilly, S. J., and Longair, M. S. 1984, M.N.R.A.S. 211, 833. [LL] Google Scholar
Lilly, S. J., Longair, M. S., and Miller, L. 1985a, M.N.R.A.S. 214, 109.Google Scholar
Lilly, S. J., Longair, M. S., and Allington-Smith, J. R. 1985b, M.N.R.A.S. 215, 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connell, R. 1986, to appear in STScI Conference on Stellar Populations, Tosi, M. and Norman, C. (eds.), Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ostriker, J., and Hausman, M. 1977, Ap. J. 217, L125.Google Scholar
Peebles, P. J. E. 1986, Nature 321, 27.Google Scholar
Perryman, M. A. C., Lilly, S. J., Longair, M. S., and Downes, A. J. B. 1984, M.N.R.A.S. 209, 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renzini, A., and Buzzoni, A. 1986 in Spectral Evolution of Galaxies, Chiosi, C. and Renzini, A. (eds.), p. 195. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandage, A. R. 1972, Ap. J. 178, 1.Google Scholar
Sandage, A. R. 1975, in “Galaxies and the Universe”, Vol. IX of Stars and Stellar Systems, Sandage, A., Sandage, M., and Kristian, J. (eds.), p. 761. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sandage, A. R., Kristian, J., and Westphal, J. A. 1976, Ap. J. 205, 688.Google Scholar
Schneider, D. P., Gunn, J. E., and Hoessel, J. B. 1983, Ap. J. 264, 337.Google Scholar
Spinrad, H. 1986, Publ. Astr. Soc. Pacific 98, 269.Google Scholar
Spinrad, H., and Djorgovski, S. 1984, Ap. J. 285, L49.Google Scholar
Spinrad, H., Djorgovski, S., Marr, J., and Aguilar, L. 1985, Publ. Astr. Soc. Pacific 97, 932.Google Scholar
Tinsley, B. T. 1972, Ap. J. 173, L93.Google Scholar
Tinsley, B. T. 1977, Ap. J. 211, 621.Google Scholar
Yates, M. G., Miller, L., and Peacock, J. A. 1986, M.N.R.A.S. 221, 311.Google Scholar