Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T10:22:24.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two Station Television Meteor Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

R. L. Hawkes
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada N6A 3K7
J. Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada N6A 3K7

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Single station studies cannot provide detailed information such as zenith angle, velocity, heights and magnitude for individual meteors and Ceplecha (1976) has stressed the need for two station television observations which could provide such information through triangulation analyses. This paper deals with some of the results of the first two station television intensifier study of faint meteors, and the implications of these results concerning the validity of the current theories of the structure and ablation of dustball meteors.

Type
II: Meteors and Meteorites
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1980 

References

Ceplecha, Z., 1976, Trans. IAU XVIA, 145.Google Scholar
Greenhow, J.S., 1963, Smithson. Contrib. Astrophys., 7, 5.Google Scholar
Greenhow, J.S. and Hall, J.E., 1961, Planet Sp. Sci. 5, 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, R.L. and Jones, J., 1975, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc., 170, 363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacchia, L.G., Verniani, F. and Briggs, R.E., 1967, Smithson. Contr. Astrophys. 10,1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, B.A. and Simek, M., 1977, Bull. Astron. Inst. Czech. 28, 181.Google Scholar
Poole, L.M.G. and Kaiser, T.R., 1967, Planet. Sp. Sci. 15, 1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, D.W. and Forsyth, P.A., 1963, Can. J. Phys. 41, 679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verniani, F., 1966, J. Geophys. Res., 71, 1749.Google Scholar