Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T13:33:43.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing risk: are we being overcautious?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2018

Paul Bacon
Paul Bacon*
Affiliation:
Bryan & Armstrong, Solicitors, The New Meeting House, St Peter's Court, Station Street, Mansfield, Notts NGI8 IEF
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In this paper, I wish to address three questions: “are we being overcautious in the assessment of risk?”; “should we actually assess risk?”; and “are clinicians the right people to be assessing risk?”.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 170 , Issue S32: Assessing risk in the mentally disordered , April 1997 , pp. 30 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, E. & Crichton, J. (1995) Exparte A: Psychopathy, treatability and the law. journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 6, 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.