Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T18:21:36.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Birth Rank in Schizophrenia: With a Consideration of the Bias due to Changes in Birth-Orate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

E. H. Hare
Affiliation:
Bethlem Royal and the Maudsley Hospitals, London, S.E.5
J. S. Price
Affiliation:
Bethlem Royal and the Maudsley Hospitals, London, S.E.5

Extract

Studies of the relation between birth rank and schizophrenia (or any other disorder of adults) have hitherto been based on the assumption that, for a null hypothesis, cases will be randomly distributed among the birth ranks. In other words, if the distribution of cases is found to depart significantly from random (i.e. from equal numbers in each birth rank for each sibship size) then an association between birth rank and the disorder is held to have been demonstrated. However, we have recently shown, both from theoretical considerations (Price and Hare, 1969) and from the study of a large sample of psychiatric patients (Hare and Price, 1969b), that birth-rank distribution may depart very significantly from random because of bias arising from changes in the birth rate of the general population. The amount and direction of this bias will depend both on the changes in family size and on the number of families being started during the period of time when the patients (or any other population sample) and their siblings were born. The amount of bias is thus likely to be different in geographically different populations or in the same population at different periods of time.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1970 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Altus, W. D. (1966). ‘Birth order and its sequelae.’ Science, 151, 44–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Barker, D. J. P., and Record, R. G. (1967). ‘The relationship of the presence of disease to birth order and maternal age.’ Amer J. hum. Genet., 19, 433–49.Google Scholar
Barry, H., and Barry, H. (1967). ‘Birth order, family size, and schizophrenia.’ Arch. gen Psychiat., 17, 435–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Canada Year Book

Cochran, W. G. (1954). ‘Some methods of strengthening the common chi square tests.’ Biometrics, 10, 417–51.Google Scholar
Dunham, H. W. (1964). ‘Socical class and schizophrenia.’ Amer. J. Orihopsychiat., 34, 634–42.Google Scholar
Farina, A., Barry, H., and Garmezy, N. (1963). ‘Birth order of recovered and nonrecovered schizophrenics.’ Arch. gen. Psychiat., 9, 224–8.Google Scholar
Goldberg, E. M., and Morrison, S. L. (1963). ‘Schizophrenia and social class.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 109, 785802.Google Scholar
Granville-Grossssman, K. L. (1966). ‘Birth order and schizophrenia.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 112, 119–26.Google Scholar
Greenwood, M., and Yule, G. U. (1914). ‘On the determination of size of family and of distribution of characters in order of birth from samples taken through members of the sibships.’ J. Roy. stat. Soc., 77, 179–99.Google Scholar
Gregory, I. (1959). ‘An analysis of family data on 1000 patients admitted to a Canadian mental Hospital.’ Acta genet. stat. Med., 9, 5496.Google Scholar
Grunfeld, B., and Salveson, C. (1968). ‘Functional psychosis and social status.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 114, 733–8.Google Scholar
Hare, E. H. (ed.) Triennial Statistical Report of the Bethlem Royal and the Maudsley Hospital, Years 1964-1966 (Table 4.10). London, 1968.Google Scholar
Hare, E. H. and Price, J. S. (1969a). ‘Mental disorder and season of birth: comparison of psychoses with neurosis.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 115, 533–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hare, E. H. and Price, J. S. (1969b). ‘Birth order and family size: bias caused by changes in birth rate.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 115, 647–57.Google Scholar
Johanson, E. (1958). ‘A study of schizophrenia in the male: a psychiatric and social study based on 138 cases with follow-up.’ Acta psychiat. neurol. Scand., 33, Suppl. 125.Google Scholar

League of Nations. Statistical Year Books, Geneva

Malzberg, B. (1940). Social and Biological Aspects of Mental Disorder. State Hospitals Press, Utica, New York.Google Scholar
Norton, A. (1952). ‘Incidence of neurosis related to maternal age and birth order.’ Brit. J. soc. Med., 6, 253–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Price, J. S. (1969). ‘Personality differences within families: comparison of adult brothers and sisters.’ J. biosoc. Sci., I, 177205.Google Scholar
Price, J. S. and Hare, E. H. (1969). ‘Birth order studies; some sources of bias.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 115, 633–46.Google Scholar
Registrar-General. Annual Statistical Review of England and Wales, Part H. H.M.S.O., London.Google Scholar
Sampson, E. E. (1965). ‘A study of ordinal position: antecedants and outcomes,’ in Progress in Experimental Psychology Research, ed. Maher, B. A., vol. 2. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Schachter, S. (1959). The Psychology of Affiliation. Stanford University Press, California.Google Scholar
Solomon, L., and Nuttall, R. (1966). ‘Sibling order, premorbid adjustment and remission in schizophrenia.’ J. nerv. ment. Dis., 144, 3746.Google Scholar
Stewart, M. (1962). The Success of the First-born. W.E.A. Publication, London.Google Scholar
Sundararaj, N., and Rao, B. S. S. R. (1966). ‘Order of birth and schizophrenia.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 112, 1127–9.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of The Census (1960). Historical Studies of the United States: Colonial Times to 1957. Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.