Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:14:02.199Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comparison Between the Hamilton Rating Scale and the Beck Inventory in the Measurement of Depression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

J. Bailey  and
Alec Coppen
J. Bailey
Affiliation:
External Member of Medical Research Council, Neuropsychiatry Laboratory, West Park Hospital, Epsom, Surrey
Alec Coppen
Affiliation:
External Member of Medical Research Council, Neuropsychiatry Laboratory, West Park Hospital, Epsom, Surrey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Correlations were made between ratings on the Hamilton Rating Scale for depression and the Inventory for measuring depression devised by Beck. Satisfactory and significant correlations were observed in only two-thirds of the patients, and often very divergent results were found in the remaining third.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 128 , Issue 5 , May 1976 , pp. 486 - 489
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1976 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J. & Erbaugh, J. (1961) An inventory for measuring depression. Arch. gen. Psychiat, 4, 561–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coppen, A. (1966) The Marke-Nyman Temperament Scale—an English translation. Brit. J. med. Psychol., 39. 55–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eysengk, H. J. (1959) Manual of the Maudsley Personality Inventory. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, M. (1960) A rating scale for depression. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 23, 36–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metcalfe, M. & Goldman, E. (1965) Validation of an inventory for measuring depression. Brit. J. Psychiat., 111, 240–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.