Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T22:50:10.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of a Detoxification Service for Habitual Drunken Offenders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

John R. Hamilton*
Affiliation:
Broadmoor Hospital, Crowthorne, Berks; Edinburgh University Department of Psychiatry

Summary

The progress of 52 chronic alcoholic habitual drunken offenders who were offered a detoxification, assessment and referral service as an alternative to penal management for their public drunkenness was compared over a year with 48 control subjects, and each group's progress in the experimental year was compared with that in the previous year. The ‘detoxification’ patients were found not to have benefited as regards their alcoholism or episodes of drunkenness, though their periods of abstinence were longer. There were significant improvements in their accommodation and self-reported quality of life, and it is likely that their physical and perhaps mental health improved.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Edwards, G., Kyle, E. & Nicholls, P. (1974) Alcoholics admitted to four hospitals in England: social class and the interaction of alcoholics with the treatment system. Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 35, 499522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeman, T. & Hopwood, S. E. (1968) Characteristics and response to treatment of an unselected group of alcoholics. Scottish Medical Journal, 13, 237–41.Google Scholar
Hamilton, J. R., Aitken, R. C. B., Griffith, A. & Ritson, E. B. (1978) Detoxification of Habitual Drunken Offenders. Scottish Health Service Studies no. 39. Scottish Home and Health Department. Edinburgh: H.M.S.O. Google Scholar
Hershon, H. I., Cook, T. & Foldes, P. A. (1974) What shall we do with the drunkenness offender? British Journal of Psychiatry, 124, 327–35.Google Scholar
Home Office (1971) Habitual Drunken Offenders: Report of the Working Party. London: H.M.S.O. Google Scholar
Home Office (1978) Offences of Drunkenness 1977 England and Wales. London: H.M.S.O. Google Scholar
Pittman, D. J. & Gordon, C. W. (1958) Revolving Door: A Study of the Chronic Police Case Inebriate. Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press.Google Scholar
Pittman, D. J. & Tate, R. L. (1969) A comparison of two treatment programmes for alcoholics. Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 30, 888–99.Google Scholar
Ratcliff, R. A. W. (1966) Characteristics of those imprisoned in Scotland in 1965 on conviction for primarily alcoholic offences. Health Bulletin, 24, 6870.Google Scholar
Root, L. E. (1970) A community experience—treatment of the public intoxicant. Paper read at International Conference on Alcoholism and Addictions, Cardiff.Google Scholar
Ross, C. F. J. (1971) Comparison of hospital and prison alcoholics. British Journal of Psychiatry, 118, 75–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smart, R. G. (1977) The Ontario detoxication system: an evaluation of its effectiveness. In Alcoholism and Drug Dependence: A Multi-disciplinary Approach, eds. Madden, J. S., Walker, R. and Kenyon, W. H. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Trotter, T. (1788) De Ebrietate ejusque Effectibus in Corporis Humanum Complectens. M.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.