Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T03:13:04.654Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MMPI and Clinical Scales Compared

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

F. G. Stephens  and
M. Valentine
F. G. Stephens
Affiliation:
Glenside Hospital, Bristol BS16 1DD
M. Valentine
Affiliation:
Glenside Hospital, Bristol BS16 1DD
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The aim of the investigation was to compare rating scales for syndromes as given by a psychological test, the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), with those derived from a standardized psychiatric history (CAPRICE System). The first is dependent on information supplied directly by the patient, who answers a check-list; the second is based on a psychiatric interview and the completing of a codified case-history. The computerized form of the MMPI was employed (Fowler and Miller, 1969), and the scales selected were those corresponding with manifest anxiety (At scale); depression (D scale); phobias, obsessions and compulsions (Pt scale); and schizophrenia (Sc scale). The nearly corresponding scales derived from the CAPRICE System (Valentine, 1973) are the scales for Anxiety, Depression, Obsessional-Compulsive Disorder, and Psychosis.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 125 , Issue 584 , July 1974 , pp. 42 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1974 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fowler, R. D. Jr., and Miller, M. L. (1969). ‘Computer interpretation of the MMPI: its use in clinical practice.’ Arch. gen. Psychiat., 21, 502–508.Google Scholar
Valentine, M. (1973). ‘Codification and automation of psychiatric data: the CAPRICE system.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 123, 471–4.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.