Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T13:48:18.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What’s Live Got to Do with It?

Digital Drag in the Time of Covid-19

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2022

Cameron Crookston
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

With Covid-19 closure of performance spaces, drag performers were in a unique position due to the historic relationship between queer performance and recorded media, and the history of LGBTQ2+ community building through social media. Rather than — or perhaps in addition to—constituting a moment of rupture, the sudden phenomenon of digital drag presents a vital moment for revealing the relationship among liveness, media, and citational reproduction in drag’s history.

Type
Article
Information
TDR , Volume 66 , Issue 2 , June 2022 , pp. 131 - 146
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press for Tisch School of the Arts/NYU

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brennan, Niall, and Gudelunas, David, eds. 2017. “RuPaul’s Drag Race” and the Shifting Visibility of Drag Culture: The Boundaries of Reality TV. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, Philip, and Wood, Elizabeth. (1994) 2006. “Lesbian and Gay Music.” In Queering the Pitch: The New Gay and Lesbian Musicology, 2nd ed., ed. Brett, Philip, Wood, Elizabeth , and Gary, C. Thomas, 351–90. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burns, Logan. 2019. “How Mainstream Media has damaged the Drag Community.” Medium, 16 April. https://medium.com/gbc-college-english-lemonade/how-mainstream-media-has-damaged-the-drag-community-f93468d85c1a.Google Scholar
Cavalcante, Andre. 2019. “Tumbling Into Queer Utopias and Vortexes: Experiences of LGBTQ Social Media Users on Tumblr.” Journal of Homosexuality 66, 12:1715–35. doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2018.1511131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaynes, Allysin (Reid Millard). 2021. Zoom interview with author, 11 January.Google Scholar
Conception, Miss (Kevin Levesque). 2021. Zoom interview with author, 13 January.Google Scholar
Daems, Jim, ed. 2014. The Makeup of “RuPaul’s Drag Race”: Essays on the Queen of Reality Shows. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Google Scholar
Drag Race Viewing Party. 2020. Speakeasy Tattoo. 10 April.Google Scholar
Dyer, Richard. (2002) 2005. The Culture of Queers. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ferrante, Anna Antonia. 2017. “Super Troopers: The Homonormative Regime of Visibility in RuPaul’s Drag Race.” In “RuPaul’s Drag Race” and the Shifting Visibility of Drag Culture: The Boundaries of Reality TV, ed. Brennan, Niall and Gudelunas, David, 153–66. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadley, Bree. 2017. Theatre, Social Media, and Meaning Making. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halperin, David M. 2012. How to Be Gay. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jesus, Gay (Heath V. Salazar). 2021. Zoom interview with author, 18 January.Google Scholar
Kohlsdorf, Kai. 2014. “Policing the Proper Queer Subject: RuPaul’s Drag Race in the Neoliberal ‘Post’ Moment.” In The Makeup of “RuPaul’s Drag Race”: Essays on the Queen of Reality Shows, ed. Daems, Jim, 67–87. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Google Scholar
Meyer, Moe, ed. 1993. The Politics and Poetics of Camp. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Hugh. 2019. “Is RuPaul’s Drag Race good for drag?” BBC.com, 2 October. www.bbc.com/culture/article/20191002-is-rupauls-drag-race-a-good-thing-for-drag.Google Scholar
Morishita-Miki, Aidan, and MacArthur, Jonathan. 2021. Zoom interview with author, 18 January.Google Scholar
Renaud, Lizzie. 2021. Zoom interview with author, 14 January.Google Scholar
Schottmiller, Carl. 2021. “‘This is a movement!’: How RuPaul Markets Drag through DragCon Keynote Addresses.” In The Cultural Impact of “RuPaul’s Drag Race”: Why Are We All Gagging?, ed. Crookston, Cameron, 211–30. Bristol: Intellect.Google Scholar
Senelick, Laurence. 2000. The Changing Room: Sex, Drag and Theatre. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wilson, Joanna. 2013. “Judy Garland Christmas Show (1963).” Christmas TV History, 3 December. www.christmastvhistory.com/2013/12/judy-garland-christmas-show-1963.html.Google Scholar