Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T02:49:41.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Methods and Applications of Cenozoic Marine Diatom Biostratigraphy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2017

Reed P. Scherer ,
Andrey Yu. Gladenkov  and
John A. Barron
Reed P. Scherer
Affiliation:
Department of Geology & Environmental Geosciences, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115
Andrey Yu. Gladenkov
Affiliation:
Geological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences Pyzhevskii per., 7. Moscow 119017, Russia
John A. Barron
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, MS 910, Menlo Park, CA 94025
Get access

Abstract

Diatoms provide the chief Cenozoic biostratigraphic tool in marine sediments beneath high primary productivity zones, especially where calcareous fossils are rare or poorly preserved. Diatom biostratigraphy, which is based on originations and extinctions of unique taxa, is especially useful in circum-Antarctic, equatorial Pacific, and high latitude North Pacific marine successions, which are available largely from ocean drilling. Oligocene to Holocene diatom biostratigraphic zonations are correlated with the geopaleomagnetic timescale, resulting in age control of million-year to as little as hundred-thousand year resolution. Paleocene and Eocene zonations are less well developed and have lower chronostratigraphic control, but are more widely applicable, because planktonic diatom assemblages of the globally warm early Paleogene were less provincial. We review the principals and methods of biostratigraphy and the application of diatoms to age control in stratigraphic successions worldwide. Distinct biostratigraphic zonations defined for the low latitudes, the North Pacific and the Antarctic, are reviewed, and Atlantic records and Antarctic coastal records are discussed. New biostratigraphic tools are introduced, including multidimensional graphic correlation of published diatom ranges.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Paleontological Society Papers , Volume 13: Pond Scum to Carbon Sink: Geological and Environmental Applications of the Diatoms , October 2007 , pp. 61 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © by the Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akiba, F. 1986. Middle Miocene to Quaternary diatom biostratigraphy in the Nankai Trough and Japan Trench, and modified lower Miocene through Quaternary diatom zones for the middle-to-high latitudes of the North Pacific, p. 393–481. In Kagami, H. et al. (eds.), Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, 87. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Alverson, A. J., Kang, S. -H., and Theriot, E. C. 2006. Cell wall morphology and systematic importance of Thalassiosira ritscheri (Hustedt) Hasle, with a description of Shionodiscus gen. nov. Diatom Research, 21: 251–262.Google Scholar
Aubry, M. -P., Berggren, W. A., Kent, D. V., Flynn, J. J., Klitgord, K. D., Obradovich, J. D., and Prothero, D. R. 1988. Paleogene geochronology: An integrated approach. Paleoceanography, 3:707–742.Google Scholar
Baldauf, J. G. 1993. Middle Eocene through early Miocene diatom floral turnover, P. 310–326. In Prothero, D. and Berggren, W. A. (eds.), Eocene-Oligocene climatic and biotic evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Baldauf, J. G., and Barron, J. A. 1990. Evolution of biosiliceous sedimentation patterns - Eocene through Quaternary: Paleoceanographic response to polar cooling, p. 575–607. In Bleil, U. and Thiede, J. (eds.), Geological History of the Polar Oceans: Arctic versus Antarctic. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Baldauf, J. G., and Barron, J. A. 1991. Diatom biostratigraphy: Kerguelen Plateau and Prydz Bay regions of the Southern Ocean, p. 547–598. In Barron, J. et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Science Results, 119. Ocean Drilling Program, College Station, Texas.Google Scholar
Baldauf, J. G., and Iwai, M. 1995. Neogene diatom biostratigraphy for the eastern equatorial Pacific, Ocean Drilling Program Leg 138, p. 105–128. In Pisias, N. G. et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Science Results, 138. Ocean Drilling Program, College Station, Texas.Google Scholar
Barron, J. A. 1985. Miocene to Holocene planktic diatom stratigraphy, p. 413–456. In Bolli, H. M. et al. (eds.), Plankton Stratigraphy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Barron, J. A. 1992. Neogene diatom datum levels in the equatorial and North Pacific, p. 413–425. In Ishizaki, K. and Saito, T. (eds.), The Centenary of Japanese Micropaleontology. Tokyo University Press, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Barron, J. A. 2003. Planktonic marine diatom record of the past 18 m.y.: appearances and extinctions in the Pacific and Southern oceans. Diatom Research, 18(2):203–224.Google Scholar
Barron, J. A. 2005. Diatom biochronology of the early Miocene of the equatorial Pacific. Stratigraphy, 2(4), 281–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barron, J. A., and Baldauf, J. G. 1989. Tertiary cooling steps and paleoproductivity as reflected by diatoms and biosiliceous sediments, p. 341–354. In Berger, W. H. et al. (eds), Productivity of the oceans: Present and Past. Dahlem Workshop Reports. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Barron, J. A., and Gladenkov, A. Yu. 1995. Early Miocene to Pleistocene diatom stratigraphy of Leg 145, p. 3–19. In Rea, D. K. et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Science Results, 145. Ocean Drilling Program, College Station, Texas.Google Scholar
Boden, P. 1993. Taxonomy and stratigraphic occurrence of Thalassiosira tetraoestrupii sp. nov. and related species in upper Miocene and lower Pliocene sediments from the Norwegian Sea, North Atlantic and northwest Pacific. Terra Nova, 5:61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cande, S. C., and Kent, D. V. 1992. A new geomagnetic polarity time scale for the Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic. Journal of Geophysical Research, 97(B10):13917–13951.Google Scholar
Cande, S. C., and Kent, D. V. 1995. Revised calibration of the geomagnetic polarity time scale for the Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic. Journal of Geophysical Research, 100(B4):6093–6095.Google Scholar
Censarek, B., and Gersonde, R. 2002. Miocene diatom biostratigraphy at ODP Sites 689, 690, 1088, and 1092 (Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean). Marine Micropaleontology, 45:309–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cody, R., Levy, R., and Harwood, D. 2007. Thinking outside the zone: high-resolution quantitative diatom biochronology for the Antarctic Neogene. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, in press.Google Scholar
Domack, E., Leventer, A., Dunbar, R., Taylor, F., Brachfeld, S., and ODP Leg 178 Scientific Party. 2001. Chronology of the Palmer Deep site, Antarctic Peninsula: a Holocene palaeoenvironmental reference for the circum-Antarctic, The Holocene, 11, 1, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenner, J. 1984. Eocene-Oligocene planktic diatom stratigraphy in the low latitudes and high southern latitudes. Micropaleontology, 30:319–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenner, J. 1985. Late Cretaceous to Oligocene planktic diatoms, p. 413–456. In Bolli, H. M. et al. (eds.), Plankton Stratigraphy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Fenner, J. M. 1991. Taxonomy, stratigraphy, and paleoceanographic implications of Paleocene diatoms, p. 123–154. In Ciesielski, P. F. et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Science Results, 114. Ocean Drilling Program, College Station, Texas.Google Scholar
Fenner, J. M., and Mikkelsen, N. 1990. Eocene-Oligocene diatom in the western Indian Ocean: Taxonomy, stratigraphy, and paleoecology, p. 433–463. In Duncan, R. A. et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Science Results, 115. Ocean Drilling Program, College Station, Texas.Google Scholar
Fourtanier, E. 1991. Paleocene and Eocene diatom biostratigraphy and taxonomy of eastern Indian Ocean Site 752, p. 171–187. In Weissel, J. et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Science Results, 121. Ocean Drilling Program, College Station, Texas.Google Scholar
Gersonde, R., and Bárcena, M. A. 1998. Revision of the late Pliocene-Pleistocene diatom biostratigraphy for the northern belt of the Southern Ocean. Micropaleontology, 44:84–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gladenkov, A. Yu. 1998. Oligocene and Lower Miocene Diatom Zonation in the North Pacific. Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation, 6(2): 50–64.Google Scholar
Gladenkov, A. Yu. 1999. A new lower Oligocene zone for the North Pacific diatom scale, pp. 581–590. In Mayama, S. et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 14th International Diatom Symposium, Tokyo, Japan. Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein.Google Scholar
Gladenkov, A. Yu. 2005. Development of the Cenozoic North Pacific diatom assemblages and changes in oceanic ecosystem, pp. 338–369. In Gladenkov, Yu. B., and Kuznetsova, K.I. (eds.), Biosphere-ecosystem-biota in the Earth history: paleobiogeographic aspects: To the centenary of Academician V.V. Menner. Nauka Publishers, Moscow (in Russian).Google Scholar
Gladenkov, A. Yu. 2006. The Cenozoic diatom zonation and its significance for stratigraphic correlations in the North Pacific. Paleontological Journal, 40 (Suppl. 5): S571–S583.Google Scholar
Gladenkov, A. Yu., and Barron, J. A. 1995. Oligocene and early Miocene diatom biostratigraphy of Hole 884B, pp. 21–41. In Rea, D. K. et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results, 145. Ocean Drilling Program, College Station, Texas.Google Scholar
Gombos, A. M. Jr., and Ciesielski, P. F. 1983. Late Eocene to early Miocene diatoms from the southwest Atlantic, p. 793–804. In Ludwig, W. J. et al. (eds.), Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, 87. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Greuter, W., McNeill, J., Barrie, F. R., Burdet, H. -M., Demoulin, V., Filgueiras, T. S., Nicolson, D. H., Silva, P. C., Skog, J. E., Trehans, P., Turland, N. J., and Hawksworth, D. L. 2000. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (St. Louis Code). Koeltz Scientific Books, Königsten. Available at: http://www.bgbm.org/iapt/nomenclature/code/SaintLouis/0000St.Luistitle.htm.Google Scholar
Harwood, D. M., and Maruyama, T. 1992. Middle Eocene to Pleistocene diatom biostratigraphy of Southern Ocean sediments from the Kerguelen Plateau, Leg 120, p. 683–733. In Wise, S. W. Jr. et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Science Results, 120. Ocean Drilling Program, College Station, Texas.Google Scholar
Hein, J. R., Scholl, D. W., Barron, J. A., Jones, M. C., and Miller, J. 1978. Diagenesis of Late Cenozoic diatomaceous deposits and formation of the bottom stimulating reflector in the southern Bering Sea. Sedimentology, 25:155–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jousé, A. P. 1982. Paleocene diatoms and silicoflagellates from sediments of the Pacific, Indian and Atlantic Oceans, p. 131–145. In Jousé, A. P. and Krashenninikov, V. A. (eds.), Morskaya Mikropaleontologiya. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian).Google Scholar
Koc, N., and Scherer, R. P. 1996. Neogene diatom biostratigraphy of the Iceland Sea Site 907, p. 61–74. In Thiede, J. et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, 151, Ocean Drilling Program, College Station, Texas.Google Scholar
Laws, R. A. 1983. Preparing strewn slides for quantitative microscopical analysis: a test using calibrated microspheres. Micropaleontology, 29:60–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisitzin, A. P. 1972. Sedimentation in the World Ocean. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Special Publication, 17, Tulsa, Oklahoma.Google Scholar
Olney, M., Scherer, R., Bohaty, S., and Harwood, D. 2007. Oligocene - early Miocene Antarctic nearshore diatom biostratigraphy. Deep Sea Research, in press.Google Scholar
Ramsey, A. T. S., and Baldauf, J. G. 1999. A reassessment of the Southern Ocean biochronology. Geological Society Memoir 18, The Geological Society, London, 122 pp.Google Scholar
Scherer, R. 1994. A new method for the determination of absolute abundance of diatoms and other silt-sized sedimentary particles. Journal of Paleolimnology, 12, 171–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, R. and Koc, N. 1996. Late Paleogene diatom biostratigraphy and paleoenvironments of the northern Norwegian-Greenland Sea, p. 75–100. In Thiede, J. et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, 151, Ocean Drilling Program, College Station, Texas.Google Scholar
Scherer, R. P., Bohaty, S., and Harwood, D. M. 2000. Oligocene and lower Miocene siliceous microfossil biostratigraphy of Cape Roberts Project, Core CRP-2/2a, Victoria Land Basin, Ross Sea, Antarctica. Terra Antartica, 7(4), 417–442.Google Scholar
Scherer, R., Hannah, M., Maffioli, P., Persico, D., Sjunneskog, C., Strong, P., Taviani, M., and Winter, D. 2007, palaeontologic characterization and analysis of ANDRILL core AND-1b. Terra Antartica, in press.Google Scholar
Schrader, H. -J., and Fenner, J. 1976. Norwegian Sea Cenozoic diatom biostratigraphy and taxonomy. In Talwani, M., Udintsev, G., et al., Init. Repts. DSDP, 38: Washington (U.S. Govt. Printing Office), 921–1099.Google Scholar
Strelnikova, N. I. 1990. Evolution of diatoms during the Cretaceous and Paleogene periods, p. 195–204. In Simola, H. (ed.), Proceedings of the Tenth International Diatom Symposium. Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein, Germany.Google Scholar
Strelnikova, N. I. 1991. Evolution of marine diatoms: Cretaceous and Paleogene. Algologia, 1:65–72.Google Scholar
Suto, I. 2005. Taxonomy and biostratigraphy of the fossil marine diatom resting spore genera Dicladia Ehrenberg, Monocladia Suto and Syndendrium Ehrenberg in the North Pacific and Norwegian Sea. Diatom Research 20, 351–374.Google Scholar
Suto, I. 2006. The explosive diversification of the diatom genus Chaetoceros across the Eocene/Oligocene and Oligocene/Miocene boundaries in the Norwegian Sea. Marine Micropaleontology, 58, 259–269.Google Scholar
Zielinski, U., and Gersonde, R. 2002. Plio-Pleistocene diatom biostratigraphy from ODP Leg 177, Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean. Marine Micropaleontology, 45:225–268.Google Scholar
Wise, S. W., Olney, M., Covington, J. M., Egerton, V. M., Jiang, S., Kulhanek, D. K., Ramdeen, S., Schrader, H., Sims, P. A., Wood, A. S., Davis, A., Davenport, D. R., Doepler, N., Falcon, W., Lopez, C., Pressley, T., Swedberg, O. L., and Harwood, D. M. 2007. Cenozoic Antarctic DIATOMWARE/BUGCAM: an aid for research and teaching. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007-1047, Short Research Paper 017. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2007/1047/srp/srp017/of2007-1047srp017.pdf.Google Scholar