Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T19:41:44.998Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Shine on us, Grandmother Moon’: Coding in Canadian First Nations Drama

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2009

Reid Gilbert
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Current productions written, directed, and/or performed by First Nations Canadians are often characterized by a complex layering of myth and iconography operating simultaneously in more than one cultural system. The effect is richly visual and auditory theatre, but, more important, such performances highlight the essentially indexical and iconographic nature of theatre itself by writing text at the intersection of discourses with quite different political and historical markers and, in the process, bringing those discourses together to form a new typology of signs. What is problematic is the effect of such signs.

Type
Articles
Information
Theatre Research International , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , Spring 1996 , pp. 24 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © International Federation for Theatre Research 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Salter, Denis, ‘The Idea of a National Theatre’, Canadian Canons: Essays in Literary Value, ed. Lecker, Robert (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1991), p. 82.Google Scholar

2. See Wallace, Robert, ‘Constructing a Canon: A Review Essay’, Theatre History in Canada, 10 (1989), p. 222.Google Scholar

3. See Filewod, Alan, ‘The Marginalization of the Canadian Popular Theatre Alliance in the Discourse of Canadian Theatre History’, Theatre History in Canada 10 (1989), pp. 200–6.Google Scholar

4. Salter, , ‘The Idea of a National Theatre’, p. 86.Google Scholar

5. See Wallace, Robert, Producing Marginality: Theatre and Criticism in Canada (Saskatoon, SK: Fifth House, 1990)Google Scholar; Wilson, Ann, ‘Deadpan: Ideology and Criticism’, Canadian Theatre Review, 57 (1988), pp. 11–16Google Scholar; and Woodcock, George, Strange Bedfellows: The State and the Arts in Canada (Vancouver: Douglas, 1985).Google Scholar

6. Pécheux, Michel, Language, Semantics and Ideology, trans. Nagpal, Harbans (New York: St. Martin's, 1982), p. 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. Baumander repeated the production in 1989. See Peters, Helen, ‘The Aboriginal Presence in Canadian Theatre and the Evolution of Being Canadian’, Theatre Research International 18. 3 (1993), pp. 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8. Peters, Helen, ‘Towards Canadian Postmodernism’, Canadian Theatre Review, ed., Gilbert, Reid with Natalie Rewa, 76 (1993), pp. 14, 15, 17.Google Scholar

9. Knowles, Richard Paul. ‘The Dramaturgy of the Perverse’ Theatre Research International 17. 3 (1992), pp. 226–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10. Leonard, Paul, ‘The Tempest X 2 in Toronto’, Canadian Theatre Review, 54 (1988), p. 11.Google Scholar

11. Ibid.

12. Ibid.

13. Carlson, Marvin, Theatre Semiotics: Signs of Life (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990), p. 79, quoting Metz.Google Scholar

14. Lacan, Jacques, Ecrits, A Selection, trans. Sheridan, Alan (London: Tavistock, 1977), p. 304.Google Scholar

15. Lapsley, Robert and Westlake, Michael, Film Theory: An Introduction (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1988), p. 76.Google Scholar

16. See Case, Sue-Ellen, ‘Classic Drag: The Greek Creation of Female Parts’, Theatre Journal 37. 3 (1985), pp. 317–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17. Highway, Thomson, ‘A Note On Nanabush’, Dry Lips Oughta Move to Kapuskasing (Saskatoon, SK: Fifth House, 1989), p. 12.Google Scholar

18. Ibid. p. 13.

19. Godard, Barbara, ‘The Politics of Representation: Some Native Canadian Women Writers’, Canadian Literature 124–125 (1990), p. 184.Google Scholar

20. Clements, Marie Humber, Age of Iron, Ms. First production Firehall Theatre, Vancouver, 11 1993, p. i.Google Scholar

21. Godard, , ‘The Politics of Representation…’, p. 184.Google Scholar

22. Clements, , Age of Iron, p. 11.Google Scholar

23. Ibid.

24. Ibid., p. 12.

25. Ibid.

26. Ibid., pp. 14–15.

27. Elam, Keir, The Semiotics of Theatre and Drama (London: Methuen, 1980), p. 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

28. Ibid., quoting Peirce, C. S.Collected Papers Vol. 2 §. 247.Google Scholar

29. Ibid., quoting Peirce, Vol. 2, p. 363.

30. Ibid., p. 25 quoting Peirce, , Vol. 5 § 484.Google Scholar

31. Ibid., quoting Peirce, , Vol. 3 § 433.Google Scholar

32. Aronson, Arnold, ‘Postmodern Design’, Theatre Journal 43. 1 (1991), p. 5.Google Scholar

33. Age of Iron, Stage direction 1.

34. Ibid.

35. Age of Iron, Stage direction 2.

36. Age of Iron, p. 2.Google Scholar

37. Ibid.

38. Ibid., p. 3.

39. Ibid., p. 5.

40. Stage direction 7.

41. Age of Iron, p. 7.Google Scholar

42. Ibid.

43. Ibid.

44. Ibid., p. 9.

45. Ibid., p. 8.

46. In Lacanian terms, denying the slide into the idealized in the field of the Other, the i (a) of the Graphe Complet. See Lacan, , Ecrits, p. 304.Google Scholar

47. Lacan, Jacques, The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book I: Freud's Papers on Technique, 1953–1954, trans. Forrester, John (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), p. 141.Google Scholar

48. Lacan, , Ecrits, p. 304Google Scholar; Lapsley, and Westlake, , Film Theory, p. 86.Google Scholar

49. The Firehall Theatre in Vancouver, Canada is in an impoverished section of town, where Native Canadians and the homeless are often seen living on the streets.

50. Lapsley, and Westlake, , Film Theory, p. 90, quoting Stephen Heath.Google Scholar

51. Godard, , ‘The Politics of Representation…’, p. 222.Google Scholar