Article contents
Adam of Buckfield and John Sackville: Some Notes on Philadelphia Free Library MS Lewis European 53
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 July 2016
Extract
A manuscript which was once thought to have belonged to Petrarch and which is now owned by the Free Library of Philadelphia, currently catalogued as MS Lewis European 53, contains several items of interest to historians of philosophy and science. Included among the twelve mostly anonymous treatises in the codex (see below) are three hitherto unnoticed witnesses to the Aristotle commentaries of the Oxford master of arts, Adam of Buckfield. The sixth item in the collection is one of six surviving copies of Adam's commentary on the pseudo-Aristotelian De plantis, four already having been listed in Charles Lohr's inventory published in this journal and the fifth, in a Munich manuscript, having recently been brought to my attention by the same scholar. The ninth item is a copy of the first recension of Adam's commentary on the De sensu et sensato and the tenth item a copy of the first recension of the same master's commentary on the De generatione et corruptione. None of these works has been edited.
- Type
- Miscellany
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Fordham University Press
References
1 See De Ricci, S., Census of Medieval and Renaissance Manuscripts in the United States and Canada II (New York 1937) 2056. The ascription probably derived from three inserted vellum folios containing Petrarch's ex-libris and a biography.Google Scholar
2 See Emden, B. A., A Biographical Register of the University of Oxford to A.D. 1500 I (Oxford 1957) 297 and Callus, D. in New Catholic Encyclopedia (New York 1967) I 116.Google Scholar
3 Lohr, C. H., ‘Medieval Latin Aristotle Commentaries,’ Traditio 23 (1967) at 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Viz. MS Munich, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek Clm. 14522 (private correspondence, 12 June 1987). I wish here to acknowledge my debt of gratitude to Dr. Lohr for his unfailing and invaluable assistance in my research.Google Scholar
5 Lohr, 321 no. 13.Google Scholar
6 Ibid. 319 no. 7.Google Scholar
7 I am preparing a critical edition of Adam's commentary on De plantis. Google Scholar
8 See Emden III 1661–62.Google Scholar
9 According to Emden, Sackville not only studied at Paris but was rector of the University in 1256 (III 1661).Google Scholar
10 Here, as often, De Ricci is unreliable (cf. Traditio 26 [1970] 160).Google Scholar
11 See Tanner, T., Bibliotheca Britannico-Hibernica I (London 1748) 233 and Jean de Sècheville, De principiis naturae (ed. R.-M. Giguère; Montreal 1956) 9–12. See also Crowley's, T. entry in New Catholic Encyclopedia (New York 1967) VII 1074f.Google Scholar
12 Ricci, De 2056. Lohr in his inventory preserves the De Ricci corruption (see Traditio 26 [1970] 160).Google Scholar
13 The variants which Emden has found are: de Seccheville, de Arida Villa, Driton, -us, Sackville, Seccheville, Secchevill, Seckville, Sectavilla, Siccavilla (III 1661).Google Scholar
14 See Giguère 9 n. 1.Google Scholar
15 I wish to thank Mr. Frankel, W., the Reference Librarian of the Rare Book Department, The Free Library of Philadelphia, for his generous and expert assistance.Google Scholar
16 The title ‘de memoria et reminiscentia’ is found in the margin in a later hand.Google Scholar
17 The title ‘de sompno et uigilia’ is found in a later hand in the margin at the top of the page.Google Scholar
18 In the upper margin and in a second hand there appears the following note: ‘Incipiunt Glose de uegetabilibus et plantis secundum magistrum Io. de sicca uilla parisiensis.’Google Scholar
19 In the margin in a later hand appears the title ‘liber de morte et uita.’Google Scholar
20 The note ‘incipit liber de sensu et sensato’ is written in the margin.Google Scholar
21 In the upper margin in a second hand there appears the following note: ‘Incipiunt glose libri de generatione et corruptione secundum magistrum Johannem de sicca villa parisiensis.’Google Scholar
22 In the margin in a later hand there appears the following note: ‘Rationes super secundum librum phisicorum et tertium et quartum.’Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by