Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T15:44:44.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ivan the Terrible in Russian Historiography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

G. H. Bolsover
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Russian historians have taken a livelier interest in Ivan the Terrible than in any other Tsar except Peter the Great. But they have always been seriously handicapped in their treatment of him by grave deficiencies in the material at their disposal. These deficiencies are of two kinds. First, the material is very incomplete and scanty. The Moscow archives and many other Russian documentary records were destroyed during the ‘Time of Troubles’ and in the great fire of Moscow of 1626, and historians have had to try to reconstruct the history of sixteenth-century Russia from what have been called ‘accidental scraps and fragments of material’. Secondly, an appreciable part of even the material which survives, such as the Chronicles, the correspondence between Ivan and Kurbsky, and Kurbsky's History of the Grand Prince of Moscow, is partisan and has to be used with the greatest caution. By the sixteenth century, Russian Chronicles had begun to be written and revised to put an official gloss on events; the correspondence between Ivan and Kurbsky was polemical in tone and aim; and the History of the Grand Prince of Moscow was an able political pamphlet aimed at influencing opinion in Lithuania. With only fragmentary and partisan sources to draw on, Russian historians came to differ widely in their interpretation of Ivan the Terrible and his achievements, particularly in the pioneer days of historical writing. But in a penetrating sketch of Ivan's reign published in 1923 Platonov felt able to affirm that, in the course of the controversy, Ivan and his times had begun to be substantially understood, and that this ‘success’ was ‘one of the brilliant pages in (Russian) historiography, one of the decisive victories of the scientific method’.

Type
Research Article
Information
Transactions of the Royal Historical Society , Volume 7 , January 1957 , pp. 71 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 71 note 1 ΠπaTOHOB, C., ИбaH; ΓpозHbιῠ ( Berlin, 1924, p. 5Google Scholar.

page 72 note 1 TaTИщeB, B. H., Paзιобоp о noлƅзe Hayk u yɥuлuɰ ( Moscow, 1887 ), pp. 101, 138Google Scholar.

page 72 note 2 бoиTлH, И., ΠpumeчaHuя Ha ucmopuιo; ƋϒeбHuя u HbιHeщHuя Poccuu ƨ. Лeκиepκa, i. 309–10, 317–19Google Scholar.

page 73 note 1 ЩepōбaTOB, M., Иcmopuя Poccuῠcκaя om σpeбHeŭɯux ϐpemëH, v, pt. I, pp. 217–24Google Scholar.

page 75 note 1 KapaMзлH, H., Иcmopuя Γocy∂apcmϐa Poccuŭckoƨo (St. Petersburg, 1897–9), viii, ix, 357–61Google Scholar.

page 75 note 2 Ewers, J. P. G., Geschichte der Russen (Dorpat, 1816), pt. 1, pp, 262, 270–1Google Scholar, and Beiträge zur Kentniss Russlands und seiner Geschichte (Dorpat, 1818), i. 186Google Scholar.

Page 76 note 1 ApцьIÕa;schye;B;, H., ‘O CBOйCTBaX цapя ИoaHHa BaCильeBиchcy;a’, BecmHuK Eϐ;ponы (1821) cxx (1821)Google Scholar. I have unfortunately been unable to obtain the text of Artsybashev's article and have had to rely on the brief summary of it given by БyдOBHиц, И. in an article called ‘ИBaH ГpoɜHьIй B PyccKOй ИCTOpиecKOй Л’ in чeckue Ʒanucku, 21 (1947), pp. 282–3Google Scholar.

Page 76 note 2 H. Иoиeboй, Иcmopuя pycckoςo hapomana (Moscow, 1833)Google Scholar, and ЦapcmϐOϐaHue; ИoaHHa ГpoɜHOςO; OmpыϐOK uɜ ucmopuu cyocy∂apcmɞu Poccuςo;, 2nd ed. (Berlin, 1870)Google Scholar.

Page 77 note 1 YctpчлoB, H., pycmopuИcmopuя, 5th edn. (St. Petersburg, 1855), i. 224–47Google Scholar.

Page 77 note 2 гoдиH;, M. чeckue Ompыɞku (Moscow, 1846 and 1867), i. 228–70Google Scholar; ii. 174–96.

Page 79 note 1 KaBeлиH, K., coõpahue coчuHcHuŭ i. 45–54, 227–8, 395–412, 639–42Google Scholar.

Page 80 note 1 CoлoBbëb, C., Иcmopuя pocuu c ∂peeHeüшux ϐpeMëH, 3rd edn. (St. Petersburg), vi. 34–5, 328, 1–536Google Scholar.

page 81 note 1 Кoctomapob, H., Pfeo б ?uэheonucahu? eë ౭۸aϐheῠwux ∂яme۸e,, 6th edn. (St.Petersburg, 1912 ), i, 327 –59, 368–419Google Scholar, and ‘личhoctцapя иbaha Bacлчa гpoпгo’cy;a ГpozeHoгo’, BecmHuK Eϐpon?; (1871), pp. 499–571; Илobaйckий, Д., Иcmopuя Poccuu, (Moscow, 1890 ), iii. 151–331Google Scholar.

page 81 note 2 ЧиCTOBич, Я., Иcmopuя nepб?x Me∂uuhckux IIIko۸ B Poccuu, pp. Iv–lxGoogle Scholar; Глaгoлeb, Д., ДyшeɞHaя Бoлeэhъ Иoahha Гpoэhoгo‘, Pyccmu Apxu, ii (1902), 500–15Google Scholar; KoBaлebckий, п, ИoaHH Гpoэ? u eэo ∂uwee cocmoяhue (Kharkov, 1893)Google Scholar.

page 81 note 3 Bcyectyҗ-PIoMиH, K., Pycckaя Иcmopuя, 1st edn. (St. Petersburg, 1885), ii. 196–317Google Scholar; Бeлob, E., PyccKaя Иcmopuyacy ∂o peфopm?ι Пempa Beuko౭o, pp. 202–78Google Scholar.

page 82 note 1 Kл?чebckий, B., Kypc pyccкo ucmopuu (Petrograd, 1918), ii. 170–245Google Scholar.

page 83 note 1 Kиэebttep, A., ‘ИBaи Гpo∂Hый и eгo Oии0hehtы’, Pycckaя M?c۸ƅ (1895), x. 62–77Google Scholar.

page 84 note 1 ПлatOhob, C., Oчepкu no ucmopuu Cmymы (Moscow, 1937), pp. 92–141Google Scholar.

page 86 note 1 плπatoИϐah гpoэhып пabлob-cиъϐahckий, C., coчuhehuя (1909–1910), i. 60–3; iii. 409–12Google Scholar.

page 87 note 1 пokpockий, M., Pycckaя иcmopuя c∂oeϐheὓwux ϐpemëh, 3rd edn., (Moscow, 1920), i. 277–354Google Scholar.

page 87 note 2 пpomuϐ Ƣcmopuчeckoῠ kohueuuu M. H. пokpoϐcko౭o, ed. гpekob, ъ., etc. (1939), PP. 3–9Google Scholar, and пpomue Ahmumapkcucmckoῠ Kohuenuuu M. H. Пo?poϐcko۸o, ed. , ъ. Гpekob, etc. (1940), pp. 4–24Google Scholar.

page 88 note 1 bилпep, P., иϐah гpoэыὓ (MOSCOW, 1922), p. IIIGoogle Scholar.

page 89 note 1 Иcmopuя CCCp, ed. гpekob;, Б., Бaxpyшиh, C., лe⋯eдeb, B., 1st ed. (1939–1940)Google Scholar; i. 346–400; Бaxpyшиϐah, C., г po∂hыῠ (Moscow, 1942)Google Scholar; Cmиphob, И., Иϐah г poэы (Leningrad, 1944)Google Scholar. A list of the most important articles, etc., by Soviet historians on sixteenth-century Russia will be found inИcmopuчeckue эanucku, 21 (1947), pp. 328–40Google Scholar.

page 89 note 2 Иcmopuя CCCp, loc.cit.

page 89 note 3 Бaxpyǀиh, C., Hayчhыe T py∂ы, ii. 8–9, 256Google Scholar.