Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T20:20:31.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Quiet Revolution of a B Natural: Prokofiev's ‘New Simplicity’ in the Second Violin Concerto

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2011

DEBORAH RIFKIN
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay explores changes in Prokofiev's compositional style that occurred in the mid-1930s, around the time that he was making his decision to return to his homeland. In his diary Prokofiev wrote about a desire for a ‘new simplicity’, a style that featured simple melodies and comprehensible form. Compared to the avant-garde aspirations of his earlier works, his ‘new simplicity’ features a self-conscious return to Classical precedents. Prokofiev believed his new lyricism would be a uniquely modern yet accessible music for the Soviet people. Many of his most popular works, including Lieutenant Kijé (1933), Romeo and Juliet (1935–6), and Peter and the Wolf (1936), are written in the style associated with this ‘new simplicity’. The style is distinctive because of its sudden and markedly trangressive chromatic swerves to distant harmonic areas. By invoking and then thwarting tonal conventions, Prokofiev creates a compelling tension between Classicism and modernism. This essay presents the first movement of his Violin Concerto no. 2 (1935) as an exemplar of his ‘new simplicity’. The fractured musical surface is interpreted as a musical narrative, as an ironic satire of sonata form.

Type
Articles
Information
Twentieth-Century Music , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , September 2009 , pp. 183 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BaileyShea, Matthew. ‘Beyond the Beethoven Model: Sentence Types and Limits’. Current Musicology 77 (2004), 5–33.Google Scholar
Bek, Mikuláš, Chew, Geoffrey, and Macek, Petr, eds. Socialist Realism and Music. Prague/Brno: KLP/Institute of Musicology, Masaryk University, 2004.Google Scholar
Bown, Matthew Cullerne. Socialist Realist Painting. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Caplin, William. Classical Form: a Theory of Formal Functions for the Instrumental Music of Haydn, Mozart, and Beethoven. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Downes, Olin. ‘Prokofieff Speaks: Russian Composer, Here This Week, Favors Return to Simpler, More Melodic Style’, New York Times, 2 February 1930, 112.Google Scholar
Hatten, Robert. Musical Meaning in Beethoven: Markedness, Correlation, and Interpretation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Hepokoski, James, and Darcy, Warren. ‘The Medial Caesura and Its Role in the Eighteenth-Century Sonata Exposition’. Music Theory Spectrum 19/2 (1997), 115–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hepokoski, James, and Darcy, Warren. Elements of Sonata Theory: Norms, Types, and Deformations in the Late Eighteenth-Century Sonata. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, Martha. ‘Neoclassic and Anachronistic Impulses in Twentieth-Century Music’. Music Theory Spectrum 18/2 (1996), 200–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matz, Jesse. The Modern Novel: a Short Introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2004.Google Scholar
Minturn, Neil. The Music of Sergei Prokofiev. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Morrison, Simon. The People's Artist: Prokofiev's Soviet Years. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Nestyev, Israel V.Sergei Prokofiev: His Musical Life, trans. Prokofieva, Rose. New York: A. A. Knopf, 1946.Google Scholar
Nice, David. Prokofiev: from Russia to the West, 1891–1935. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Prokofiev, Sergei. Autobiography, Articles, Reminiscences, ed. Shlifstein, Semyon, trans. Prokofieva, Rose. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publication House, 1960.Google Scholar
Prokofiev, Sergei. Soviet Diary 1927 and Other Writings, ed. Palmer, Christopher, trans. Prokofiev, Oleg. Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Rifkin, Deborah. ‘A Theory of Motives for Prokofiev's Music’. Music Theory Spectrum 26/2 (2004), 265–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rifkin, Deborah. ‘Making It Modern: Chromaticism and Phrase Structure in Twentieth-Century Tonal Music’. Theory and Practice 31 (2006), 133–158.Google Scholar
Straus, Joseph. ‘Sonata Form in Stravinsky’, in Stravinsky Retrospectives, ed. Haimo, Ethan and Johnson, Paul. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1987. 141–161.Google Scholar
Straus, Joseph. Remaking the Past: Musical Modernism and the Influence of the Tonal Tradition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinden, Kevin. ‘Testing the Limits of Sonata Theory: Poulenc's Sonata for Horn, Trumpet and Trombone (1922)’. Paper presented at the South Central Society for Music Theory Annual ConferenceOxford, MI, 2008.Google Scholar