Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:24:52.993Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of Motor Development Between Twins and Singletons in Japan: A Population-Based Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2012

Yoshie Yokoyama*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health Sciences, Okayama University Medical School, Okayama, Japan. yyoko@md.okayama-u.ac.jp
Saeko Wada
Affiliation:
Nishinomiya City Public Health Center, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Masako Sugimoto
Affiliation:
Nishinomiya City Public Health Center, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Miyuki Saito
Affiliation:
Nishinomiya City Public Health Center, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Miyoko Matsubara
Affiliation:
Nishinomiya City Public Health Center, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Jun Sono
Affiliation:
Nishinomiya City Public Health Center, Nishinomiya, Japan.
*
*Address for correspondence: Yoshie Yokoyama, Faculty of Health Sciences, Okayama University Medical School, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Okayama-city, Okayama 700-8558, Japan.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This study was performed using population-based data to analyze whether motor development in early life is different between singletons and twins in Japan. For better comparison and investigation, we divided the 2 groups into a group with a birthweight of 2.5 kg or greater (subgroup A) and a group with a birthweight of less than 2.5 kg (subgroup B), respectively. We analyzed the database of medical check-ups for children aged 3 years between April 2001 and July 2004. They received medical checkups at 4 months, 1.5, and 3 years of age. Children who were suspected of having neurological abnormality or disability were referred to specialists and excluded from the database. The data of 14,132 children were analyzed. Among these, 13,040 (92.3%) children were singletons in subgroup A, 75 (0.5%) were twins in subgroup A, 866 (6.1%) were singletons in subgroup B and 151 (1.1%) were twins in subgroup B. The mean age at achieving milestones was slower in twins of subgroup A for each developmental outcome than singletons of subgroup A, and the difference between twins and singletons was significant after adjustment for rolling over. On the contrary, after adjusting for a confounding factor (gestational age), singletons of subgroup B attained motor development facilitating walking independently slower than twins of subgroup B. There were different tendencies in the results regarding the motor development of subjects of subgroup A and that of subjects of subgroup B.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007