Article contents
A barefoot childhood: so what? Imagining slums and reading neighbourhoods
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 July 2011
Abstract
Starting with Englander's denial (Urban History, 21, 2 (1994)), that ‘slums are … real only in words, … rather than being rooted in the material conditions of everyday life’, the article draws a distinction between historical analyses of slums, which entail an examination of words, signs and symbols, and analyses of inner-city neighbourhoods which have been overshadowed by slumland representations. It is claimed that this latter task entails a nuanced materialist historicism, attuned to the surviving material and oral culture of actual neighbourhoods, in place of Englander's faith in an older style of historical materialism.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995
References
1 Englander, D., review of The Imagined Slum, Urban History, 21 (1994), 309–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
2 ‘Municipal elections’, Birmingham Daily Post, 31 October 1905, 11.
3 Lowenthal, D., The Past is a Foreign Country (Cambridge, 1985), 212Google Scholar.
4 Geertz, C., ‘Making experiences, authoring selves’, in Turner, V. and Bruner, E.M. (eds), The Anthropology of Experience (Urbana, 1986), 373Google Scholar.
5 I explore this labelling process in ‘A just war: the language of slum representation in twentieth-century Australia’, Journal of Urban History, 22:1 (1995), 75–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 Englander, review of The Imagined Slum.
7 Mayne, A., The Imagined Slum: Newspaper Representation in Three Cities 1870-1914 (Leicester, 1993), 1, 2Google Scholar.
8 Englander, D., Landlord and Tenant in Urban Britain, 1838-1918 (Oxford, 1983), xiGoogle Scholar.
9 Englander, review of The Imagined Slum.
10 Ibid, 309-11.
11 Beaudry, M. (ed.), Documentary Archaeology in the New World (Cambridge, 1988), 1–2Google Scholar.
12 Castells, M., The City and the Grassroots: A Cross-Cultural Theory of Urban Social Movements (London, 1983), 302Google Scholar.
13 Kelly, M., ‘Urban history goes social: some recent work in Australia’, Urban History Yearbook (Leicester, 1984), 72Google Scholar.
14 The Age, 3 January 1931.
15 Davison, G., Dunstan, D. and McConville, C. (eds), The Outcasts of Melbourne: Essays in Social History (Sydney, 1985)Google Scholar; Howe, R. (ed.), New Houses for Old: Fifty Years of Public Housing in Victoria 1938-1988 (Melbourne, 1988)Google Scholar. And see Hicks, P., ‘“Most humble homes”: slum landlords, tenants, and the Melbourne city council's health administration, 1888-1918’ (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Melbourne, 1987)Google Scholar; Harris, D., ‘“Bad neighbourhoods”: the inner suburbs and the housing debate, Melbourne, 1900-1920’ (unpublished M.A. thesis, University of Melbourne, 1983)Google Scholar; McConville, C., ‘Outcast Melbourne: social deviance in the city, 1880-1914’ (unpublished M.A. thesis, University of Melbourne, 1974)Google Scholar. However, see also May, A., ‘“The itinerary of our days”: the historical experience of the street in Melbourne, 1837-1923” (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Melbourne, 1990)Google Scholar.
16 McCarthy, J., Archaeological Investigation of the Commonwealth Offices and Telecom Corporate Building Sites, The Commonwealth Block, Melbourne (Melbourne, 1989), vol. 1, 7, 53Google Scholar.
17 A. Yentsch, ‘Legends, houses, families, and myths: relationships between material culture and American ideology’, in Beaudry, Documentary Archaeology, 11, 16.
18 Ibid., 15.
19 Lowenthal, The Past is a Foreign Country, 248.
20 Tindall, G., The Fields Beneath: The History of One London Village (London, 1977), 14Google Scholar.
21 Darnton, R., The Great Cat Massacre and Other Episodes in French Cultural History (New York, 1984), 4Google Scholar.
22 Ibid., 4.
23 See Gans, H.J., ‘The potential environment and the effective environment’, in People and Plans. Essays on Urban Problems and Solutions (New York, 1968), 4–11Google Scholar.
24 Castells, The City and the Grassroots, 70.
25 Yentsch, ‘Legends, houses, families, and myths’, 11.
26 Parts of this argument first appeared in my ‘City as artifact: historic preservation in comparative perspective’, in Melosi, M.V. (ed.), Urban Public Policy: Historical Modes & Methods (University Park, 1993), 153–88Google Scholar.
27 McCarthy, Archaeological Investigation, 7.
28 Ibid., 15, 16, 11.
29 See the recent update by Cole, C.C. Jr, ‘Public history: what difference has it made?’, The Public Historian: A Journal of Public History, 16 (1994), 9–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
30 See Tise, L.E., ‘The practice of public history in state government’, in Howe, B.J. and Kemp, E., Public History: An Introduction (Malabar, 1986), 333Google Scholar.
31 Lewis, M., ‘The ugly historian’, Historic Environment, 5 (1986), 5Google Scholar.
32 Cressey, P.J. and Stephens, J.F., ‘The city-site approach to urban archaeology’, in Dickens, R.S. Jr (ed.), Archaeology of Urban America: The Search for Pattern and Process (New York, 1982), 43Google Scholar.
33 Birmingham, J. and Murray, T., Historical Archaeology in Australia: A Handbook (National Estate Grants Programme, project no. 24, 1987), 19–20Google Scholar.
34 Englander, review of The Imagined Slum.
35 Darnton, The Great Cat Massacre, 260.
36 J.B. Curtis, ‘Perceptions of an artifact: Chinese porcelain in colonial Tidewater Virginia’, in Beaudry, Documentary Archaeology in the New World, 31.
37 Davison, G., ‘Reading a building’ and ‘What makes a building historic?’, in Davison, G. and C. McConville, (eds), A Heritage Handbook (Sydney, 1991), 180, 75Google Scholar.
38 Castells, The City and the Grassroots, xvi.
39 Ibid., 302.
40 Ibid.
41 Dickens, Archaeology of Urban America, xx.
42 Davison, ‘What makes a building historic?’, in Davison and McConville, A Heritage Handbook, 74.
43 Examples include Cotter, J.L., Roberts, D.G. and Parrington, M., The Buried Past: An Archaeological History of Philadelphia (Philadelphia, 1993)Google Scholar; the planned 55-volume Buildings of the United States series, sponsored by the Society of Architectural Historians; and Lewis, M., Goad, P. and Mayne, A., Melbourne: The City's History and Development (Melbourne, 1994)Google Scholar.
44 Englander, review of The Imagined Slum.
- 5
- Cited by