Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T09:23:16.158Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

THE (SLAVE) NARRATIVE OF JANE EYRE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2008

Julia Sun-Joo Lee*
Affiliation:
Harvard University

Extract

InImperialism at Home, Susan Meyer explores Charlotte Brontë's metaphorical use of race and empire in Jane Eyre. In particular, she is struck by Brontë's repeated allusions to bondage and slavery and wonders, “Why would Brontë write a novel permeated with the imagery of slavery, and suggesting the possibility of a slave uprising, in 1846, after the emancipation of the British slaves had already taken place?” (71). Meyer speculates, “Perhaps the eight years since emancipation provided enough historical distance for Brontë to make a serious and public, although implicit, critique of British slavery and British imperialism in the West Indies” (71). Perhaps. More likely, I would argue, is the possibility that Brontë was thinking not of West Indian slavery, but of American slavery.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Brontë, Charlotte. Jane Eyre. Ed. Dunn, Richard J.. New York: W. W. Norton, 2000.Google Scholar
Douglass, Frederick. The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave. New York: Signet, 1968.Google Scholar
Fraser, Rebecca. Charlotte Brontë. London: Methuen, 1998.Google Scholar
Garrison, William Lloyd. The Story of His Life, Told by His Children. New York: The Century Company, 1885. 224–26. Originally appeared in the inaugural issue of The Liberator, 1 January 1831.Google Scholar
Gaskell, Elizabeth. The Life of Charlotte Brontë. New York: Penguin, 1998.Google Scholar
Gawthrop, Humphrey. “Slavery: Idée Fixe of Emily and Charlotte Brontë.” Brontë Studies: The Journal of the Bronte Society 28.2 (July 2003): 113–21.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Sandra, and Gubar, Susan. The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. New Haven: Yale UP, 1979.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Harriet. Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, Written by Herself. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2000.Google Scholar
Marcus, Sharon. “The Profession of the Author: Abstraction, Advertising, and Jane Eyre.PMLA 110.2 (March 1995): 206–19.Google Scholar
Meyer, Susan. Imperialism at Home: Race and Victorian Women's Fiction. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1996.Google Scholar
Oldfield, John R. Popular Politics and British Anti-Slavery: The Mobilization of Public Opinion Against the Slave Trade 1787-1807. London: Frank Cass, 1998.Google Scholar
Patterson, Orlando. Slavery and Social Death: A Comparative Study. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1982.Google Scholar
Richardson, Samuel. Pamela, or Virtue Rewarded. New York: Oxford UP, 2001.Google Scholar
Rigby, Elizabeth. “Review of Jane Eyre.” Quarterly Review (Dec. 1848). Brontë, Charlotte. Jane Eyre. Ed. Dunn, Richard J.. 452–53.Google Scholar
Roper, Moses. Narrative of the Adventures and Escape of Moses Roper, from American Slavery. London: Warder Office, 1839.Google Scholar
Sharpe, Jenny. Allegories of Empire: The Figure of Woman in the Colonial Text. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1993.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. “Three Women's Texts and a Critique of Imperialism.Critical Inquiry 12.1 (Autumn 1985): 243–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternlieb, Lisa Ruth. The Female Narrator in the Victorian Novel: Hidden Agendas. New York: Palgrave, 2002.Google Scholar
Temperley, Howard. British Antislavery: 1833–1870. London: Longman, 1972.Google Scholar
Winter, Kari J. Subjects of Slavery, Agents of Change: Women and Power in Gothic Novels and Slave Narratives. Athens: U of Georgia P, 1992.Google Scholar
Wood, Marcus. Blind Memory: Visual Representations of Slavery in England and America. New York: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar