Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:53:13.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of retinal growth on the postnatal development and distribution of displaced retinal ganglion cells in the retina of the chameleon (squamata)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2003

MATTHIAS OTT
Affiliation:
Institute for Anatomy, University of Tübingen, Österbergstrasse 3, 72074 Tübingen, Germany
BRENO BELLINTANI-GUARDIA
Affiliation:
Institute for Anatomy, University of Tübingen, Österbergstrasse 3, 72074 Tübingen, Germany

Abstract

Retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) usually increase their dendritic field area with postnatal retinal growth. The mechanisms that regulate the postnatal shape of dendritic arbors in the growing retina are not well understood. Quantitative studies suffer from the difficulty of labeling specific subpopulations of RGCs selectively including their dendritic processes. In this study, we labeled displaced retinal ganglion cells (DGC) that are known to project to the accessory optic system (AOS) in juvenile and adult chameleons by retrograde transport of dextran amines. The complete population of DGCs was quantitatively screened for the effects of postnatal retinal growth on cell morphology, dendritic field coverage, and dendritic arbor size. The adult eye contained 2000 DGCs/retina. This number was already present at birth. The smaller size of the hatchling eye (approximately 1/3 of the adult size) led to higher densities of DGCs. The greatest accumulation of juvenile DGCs (two-fold higher compared to the adult) was found in the periphery of the retina where the greatest surface expansion was observed. DGC dendritic field areas were adjusted proportionally to this expansion in order to maintain a constant dendritic coverage. The increase of dendritic fields was mediated by two putative passive mechanisms: First, an elongation of individual dendrites similar to previous reports of postnatal RGC development in the retina of goldfish and chicks. Second, and more prominent, we observed that neighboring dendrites were pulled apart from each other. This resulted in a looser spacing of the initially tightly packed dendrites of each dendritic arbor. This dispersal of dendrites over a larger area was, due to its passive nature, proportional to the increase of the retinal surface and preserved a constant dendritic coverage irrespective of the animal's age and eye size.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)