Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T20:59:38.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Absorption and translocation of glufosinate on four weed species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Gregory J. Steckel
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Stephen E. Hart
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801

Abstract

Greenhouse and laboratory experiments were conducted to evaluate foliar absorption, translocation, and efficacy of glufosinate on four weed species. The rate of glufosinate required to reduce shoot dry weight by 50% (GR50) varied between weed species. GR50 values for giant foxtail, barnyardgrass, velvetleaf, and common lambsquarters were 69, 186, 199, and 235 g ai ha−1, respectively. Absorption of 14C-glufosinate increased with time and reached a plateau 24 hours after treatment (HAT). Absorption of 14C-glufosinate was 67, 53, 42, and 16% for giant foxtail, barnyardgrass, velvetleaf, and common lambsquarters, respectively. Translocation of absorbed 14C-glufosinate from the treated leaf was greatest for giant foxtail and barnyardgrass (15 and 14% 24 HAT of absorbed 14C-glufosinate, respectively). This compared to 5 and < 1% for translocation of absorbed 14C-glufosinate from the treated leaves of velvetleaf and common lambsquarters. The majority of 14C-glufosinate translocated by giant foxtail and barnyardgrass was found below the treated leaf and in the roots, indicating phloem mobility of the herbicide. Differential absorption and translocation of 14C-glufosinate may be contributing factors to the differential sensitivity observed between weed species.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, D. M., Swanton, C. J., Hall, J. C., and Mersey, B. G. 1993a. The influence of soil moisture, simulated rainfall and time of application on the efficacy of glufosinate-ammonium. Weed Res. 33: 149160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, D. M., Swanton, C. J., Hall, J. C., and Mersey, B. G. 1993b. The influence of temperature and relative humidity on the efficacy of glufosinate-ammonium. Weed Res. 33: 139147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertges, W. J., Kinney, D. A., and Pieters, E. P. 1994. Glufosinate ammonium: review and update. North. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. Proc. 49: 57.Google Scholar
Bromilow, R. H., Chamberlain, K., and Evans, A. A. 1993. Phloem translocation of strong acids—glyphosate, substituted phosphonic and sulfonic acids—in Ricinus communis L. Pestic. Sci. 37: 3947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, K. L. and Burnside, O. C. 1984. Comparative phytotoxicity of glyphosate, SC-0545, and HOE-0061. Weed Sci. 32: 841844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claus, J. and Behrens, R. 1976. Glyphosate translocation and quackgrass rhizome bud kill. Weed Sci. 24: 149152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, M. D. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1985. Absorption, translocation, and foliar activity of clopyralid and chlorsulfuron in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) and perennial sowthistle (Sonchus arvensis). Weed Sci. 33: 524530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holloway, P. J. 1970. Surface factors affecting the wetting of leaves. Pestic. Sci. 1: 156163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mersey, B. G., Hall, J. C., Anderson, D. M., and Swanton, C. J. 1990. Factors affecting the herbicidal activity of glufosinate-ammonium: absorption, translocation, and metabolism in barley and green foxtail. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 37: 9098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridley, S. M. and McNally, S. F. 1985. Effects of phosphinothricin on the isoenzymes of glutamine synthetase isolated from plant species which exhibit varying degrees of susceptibility to the herbicide. Plant Sci. 39: 3136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaner, D. L. and Robson, P. A. 1985. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of AC 252,214 in soybean (Glycine max), common cocklebur (Xanthium stumarium), and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 33: 469471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steckel, G. J., Hart, S. E., and Wax, L. M. 1995. Glufosinate efficacy as influenced by rate, timing, and weed species. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 35: 172.Google Scholar
Wanamarta, G. and Penner, D. 1989. Foliar absorption of herbicides. Rev. Weed Sci. 4: 215231.Google Scholar
Wendler, C., Barniski, M., and Wild, A. 1990. Effect of phosphinothricin (glufosinate) on photosynthesis and photorespiration of C3 and C4 plants. Photosyn. Res. 24: 5561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wild, A. and Wendler, C. 1991. Effect of glufosinate (phosphinothricin) on amino acid content, photorespiration, and photosynthesis. Pestic. Sci. 30: 422424.Google Scholar
Wyrill, J. B. and Burnside, O. C. 1977. Glyphosate toxicity to common milkweed and hemp dogbane as influenced by surfactant. Weed Sci. 25: 275287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar