Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:03:12.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adsorption of Ametryne and Diuron by Soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

L. C. Liu ,
H. Cibes-Viadé  and
F. K. S. Koo
L. C. Liu
Affiliation:
Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Puerto Rico
H. Cibes-Viadé
Affiliation:
Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Puerto Rico
F. K. S. Koo
Affiliation:
Puerto Rico Nuclear Center, Puerto Rico
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The adsorption of 2-(ethylamino)-4-(isopropylamino)-6-(methylthio)-s-triazine (ametryne) and 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (diuron) varied greatly among 34 Puerto Rican soils was studied using the agitated slurry technique. Adsorption was expressed as a distribution coefficient (Kd), which is the ratio of the amount of herbicide adsorbed to the amount in the equilibrium solution. In general, diuron was adsorbed to a greater degree than ametryne. Adsorption of ametryne was positively correlated with organic matter and silt content but negatively correlated with pH of the soil. The inclusion of soil pH in a multiple regression analysis contributed the highest increase in explanation for adsorption of ametryne. Adsorption of diuron was highly correlated with organic matter content and cation exchange capacity. A correlation was found between adsorption of diuron and content of magnesium, and soil texture. Cation exchange capacity was the only inclusion soil property which, in addition to organic matter, significantly contributed to the adsorption of diuron. Temperature appeared to have a greater effect on the adsorption of diuron than on the adsorption of ametryne. Conversely, the effect of pH on the adsorption of ametryne was significantly greater than that of diuron.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , July 1970 , pp. 470 - 474
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Allingham, M. M., Cullen, J. M., Giles, C. H., Jain, S. K., and Woods, J. S. 1958. Adsorption at inorganic surface. II. Adsorption of dyes and related compound by silica. J. Appl. Chem. 8:108–116.Google Scholar
2. Baily, G. W. and White, J. L. 1964. Review of adsorption and desorption of organic pesticides by soil colloids, with implications concerning pesticide bioactivity. J. Agr. and Food Chem. 12:324–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Burnside, O. C. and Lavy, T. L. 1966. Dissipation of dicamba. Weeds 14:211–214.Google Scholar
4. Day, B. E., Jordan, L. S., and Jolliffe, V. A. 1968. The influence of soil characteristics on the adsorption and phytotoxicity of simazine. Weed Sci. 16:209–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Dowler, C. C., Baughman, N. W., and Veatch, C. 1958. The effect of soil types, soil pH and simulated rainfall on the distribution of DNBP in the soil. Weeds 6:281–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Frissel, M. J. and Bolt, G. H. 1962. Interaction between certain ionizable organic compounds (herbicides) and clay minerals. Soil Sci. 94:284–291.Google Scholar
7. Geissbuhler, H., Hasalbach, C., and Aebi, H. 1963. The fate of N'-(4 chlorophenoxy)-phenyl N,N-dimethylurea (C-1983) in soil and plants. I. Adsorption and leaching in different soils. Weed Res. 3:140–153.Google Scholar
8. Hance, R. J. 1965. The adsorption of urea and some of its derivatives by a variety of soils. Weed Res. 5:98–107.Google Scholar
9. Hance, R. J. 1965. Observations on the relationship between the adsorption of diuron and the nature of the adsorbent. Weed Res. 5:108–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Hance, R. J. 1967. The speed of attainment of sorption equilibra in some systems involving herbicides. Weed Res. 7:29–36.Google Scholar
11. Harris, C. I. 1966. Adsorption, movement, and phytotoxicity of monuron and s-triazine herbicides in soil. Weeds 14:6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Harris, C. I. and Warren, G. F. 1964. Adsorption and desorption of herbicides by soil. Weeds 12:120–126.Google Scholar
13. Harris, C. I. and Sheets, T. J. 1965. Influence of soil properties on the adsorption and phytotoxicity of CIPC, diuron, and simazine. Weeds 13:215–219.Google Scholar
14. Hartley, G. S. 1964. Herbicide behavior in the soil, p. 129–132. In Audus, L. J. (ed.) The Physiology and Biochemistry of Herbicides. Academic Press, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
15. Liu, L. C. and Cibes-Viadé, H. 1968. Influence of soil properties on the phytotoxicity of atrazine, ametryne, prometryne and diuron in Puerto Rican soils. J. Agr. Univ. of Puerto Rico 52(4):269–280.Google Scholar
16. McGlamery, M. D. and Slife, F. W. 1966. The adsorption and desorption of atrazine as affected by pH, temperature, and concentration. Weeds 14:237–239.Google Scholar
17. Nearpass, D. C. 1965. Effect of soil acidity on adsorption, penetration and persistence of simazine. Weeds 13:341–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Obien, S. R., Suehisa, R. H., and Younge, O. R. 1966. The effect of soil factors on the phytotoxicity of neburon to oats. Weeds 14:105–109.Google Scholar
19. Schliebe, K. A., Burnside, O. C., and Lavy, T. L. 1965. Dissipation of amiben. Weeds 13:321–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Sherburne, H. R. and Freed, V. H. 1954. Adsorption of 3-(p-chlorophenyl)-1, 1-dimethylurea as a function of soil constituents. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2:937–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Talbert, R. E. and Fletchall, O. H. 1965. The adsorption of some s-triazines in soils. Weeds 13:46–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Tompkins, E. R. and Mayer, S. W. 1947. Ion exchange as a separation method. III. Equilibrium studies of the reactions of rare earth complex with synthetic ion exchange resin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 69:2859–2865.Google Scholar
23. Upchurch, R. P., Selman, F. L., Mason, D. D., and Kampratch, E. J. 1966. The correlation of herbicidal activity with soil and climatic factors. Weeds 14:42–49.Google Scholar
24. Weber, J. B., Perry, P. W., and Ibaraki, K. 1968. Effect of pH on the phytotoxicity of prometryne applied to synthetic soil media. Weed Sci. 16:134–136.Google Scholar
25. Weber, J. B., Perry, P. W., and Upchurch, R. P. 1965. The influence of temperature and time on the adsorption of paraquat, diquat, 2,4-D and prometone by clays, charcoal and an anion exchange resin. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. 29: 678–688.Google Scholar
26. Williams, J. D. H. 1968. Adsorption and desorption of simazine by some Rothamsted soils. Weed Res. 8:327–335.Google Scholar
27. Yuen, Q. H. and Hilton, H. W. 1962. Soil adsorption of herbicides: The adsorption of monuron and diuron by Hawaiian sugarcane soil. J. Agr. Food Chem. 10:386–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar