Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:01:47.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Additives upon Phenmedipham for Weed Control in Sugarbeets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Stephen D. Miller  and
John D. Nalewaja
Stephen D. Miller
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., N. D. State Univ., Fargo, North Dakota 58102
John D. Nalewaja
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., N. D. State Univ., Fargo, North Dakota 58102
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Weed control and sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) injury from applications of methyl m-hydroxycarbanilate m-methyl-carbanilate (phenmedipham) were influenced by additives, volume of additive, and species in both field and greenhouse experiments. Oils were more effective than the surfactant as additives to phenmedipham on green foxtail (Setaria virdis (L.) Beauv.), yellow foxtail (Setaria glauca (L.) Beauv.), redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.), or common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.). Herbicidal activity of phenmedipham on kochia (Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad.) or wild mustard (Brassica kaber (D.C.) L.C. Wheeler var. pinnatifida (Stokes) L.C. Wheeler) was not enhanced by any additive. Linseed oil (2.34 L/ha) enhanced the herbicidal activity of phenmedipham on green foxtail, yellow foxtail, and redroot pigweed more than petroleum (2.34 L/ha) or sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) oil (2.34 or 9.35 L/ha). However, linseed oil reduced the herbicidal activity of phenmedipham on kochia.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , January 1973 , pp. 67 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Aya, F. O. and Ries, S. K. 1968. Influence of oils on the toxicity of amitrole to quackgrass. Weed Sci. 16:288–290.Google Scholar
2. Bayer, G. H. 1965. 1965 Weed control in field corn. Proc. Northeast. Weed Contr. Conf. 20:261–266.Google Scholar
3. Bandeen, J. D. 1969. Wetting agents, oils. Crops Soils Mag. 21:7:14–15.Google Scholar
4. Barrentine, J. L. and Warren, G. F. 1970. Isoparaffinic oil as a carrier for chloropropham and terbacil. Weed Sci. 18:365–372.Google Scholar
5. Burr, R. J. and Warren, G. F. 1971. Enhancement of herbicide activity with an isoparaffinic oil carrier. Weed Sci. 19:701–705.Google Scholar
6. Frank, R. 1967. Pyrazon, a selective herbicide for sugarbeets. Weeds 15:197–201.Google Scholar
7. Jones, G. E. and Anderson, G. W. 1964. Atrazine as a foliar application in an oil water emulsion. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Contr. Conf. 20:27–29.Google Scholar
8. Liu, L. C., Ilnicki, R. D., Regan, J. B., and Visinski, E. J. 1966. Naphthenic and paraffinic oils as adjuvants in atrazine and linuron sprays for weed control in corn. Proc. Northeast. Weed Contr. Conf. 20:309–316.Google Scholar
9. Nalewaja, J. D. 1968. Postemergence atrazine treatment for weed control in corn. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Contr. Conf. 23:12–13.Google Scholar
10. Raleigh, S. M. 1967. Grass control in corn. Proc. Northeast. Weed Contr. Conf. 21:243–247.Google Scholar
11. Schweizer, E. E. 1970. Influence of pyrazon and dalapon on the seasonal growth of sugarbeets. Weed Sci. 18:386–388.Google Scholar
12. Schweizer, E. E. and Weatherspoon, D. M. 1971. Response of sugarbeets and weeds to phenmedipham and two analogues. Weed Sci. 19:635–639.Google Scholar