Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T13:45:25.974Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) Herbicide Carryover on Subsequent Crops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

C. Brent Rogers ,
Ronald Talbert  and
Robert Frans
C. Brent Rogers
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Altheimer Lab., Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Ronald Talbert
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Altheimer Lab., Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Robert Frans
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Altheimer Lab., Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The residual effect of three cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) herbicide programs, including the use of no herbicides, a minimum program consisting of fluometuron {N,N-dimethyl-N′-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl] urea} and MSMA (monosodium salt of methylarsonic acid), and an intensive program consisting of trifluralin [2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzenamine], fluometuron, MSMA, and linuron [N′-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-N-methoxy-N-methylurea], were evaluated from 1976 to 1982. Herbicide injury to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth.) on three soils showed carryover effects in the following sequence: Sharkey silty clay > Dundee silt loam > Loring silt loam. The intensive program was the most injurious on the Sharkey silty clay. The effects of the two herbicide programs were nearly equal on the Dundee and Loring silt loams. Possible replacement crops for cotton, such as grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.] and corn (Zea mays L.) suffered the least damage from carryover; rice (Oryza sativa L.), soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] and cucumber (Cucumis sativis L.) suffered severe damage. Greenhouse bioassays generally confirmed field results, and fluometuron appeared to be the major component of carryover.

Keywords

Herbicide residuefluometuroncover cropsbioassay
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 34 , Issue 5 , September 1986 , pp. 756 - 760
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literatur Cited

1. Abernathy, J. R. and Keeling, J. W. 1979. Efficacy and rotational crop response to levels and dates of herbicide applications. Weed Sci. 27:312–317.Google Scholar
2. Anonymous. 1983. Herbicide Handbook, 5th ed. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, IL. 515 pp.Google Scholar
3. Brewer, F., Lavy, T. L., and Talbert, R. E. 1982. Effect of three dinitroaniline herbicides on rice (Oryza sativa) growth. Weed Sci. 30:153–158.Google Scholar
4. Chandler, J. M. and Savage, K. E. 1980. Phytotoxic interaction between phenylurea herbicides in a cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) – soybean (Glycine max) sequence. Weed Sci. 38:521–526.Google Scholar
5. Darding, R. L. and Freeman, J. F. 1968. Residual phytotoxicity of fluometuron in soils. Weed Sci. 16:226–229.Google Scholar
6. Eastin, E. F., Spears, B. R., and Merkle, M. G. 1969. Weed control in sorghum. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 22:159.Google Scholar
7. Evetts, L., Greer, H. A., and Santelmann, P. W. 1969. Effectiveness of various preemergence herbicides for use in grain sorghum. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 22:153.Google Scholar
8. Frans, R. E. 1971. Influence of cotton preemergence herbicides on growth of soybeans. Arkansas Farm Res. 20(3):2.Google Scholar
9. Horowitz, M. 1969. Evaluation of herbicide persistence in soil. Weed Res. 9:311–321.Google Scholar
10. Jackson, A. W., Jeffery, L. S., and McCutchen, T. C. 1978. Tolerance of soybeans (Glycine max) and grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) to fluometuron residue. Weed Sci. 26:454–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Lynd, J. Q., Rieck, C., Barnes, D., Murray, D., and Santelmann, P. W. 1967. Indicator plant aberations at threshold soil herbicide levels. Agron. J. 59:194–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Meredith, W. R. Jr. 1982. The cotton yield problem: Changes in cotton yields since 1950. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Mech. Conf., Las Vegas, NV. Pages 35–38.Google Scholar
13. Rogers, C. B., Talbert, R. E., and Frans, R. E. 1983. Long-term effects of two herbicide programs in continuous cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 36:18.Google Scholar
14. Sharp, T., Frans, R., and Talbert, R. 1982. Persistence of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) herbicides and injury to replacement soybeans (Glycine max) after stand failure. Weed Sci. 30:109–115.Google Scholar
15. Sheets, T. J. 1964. Review of disappearance of substituted urea herbicides from soil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 12:30–33.Google Scholar
16. Talbert, R., Frans, R., Rogers, B., Waddle, B., and Oakley, S. 1983. Long term effects of herbicides and cover crops on cotton yields. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf., Atlanta, GA. Pages 38–39.Google Scholar
17. Wells, B. R. and Gilmour, J. T. 1977. Sterility in rice cultivars as influenced by MSMA rate and water management. Agron. J. 69:451–454.Google Scholar