Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:57:02.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Haloxyfop and Haloxyfop-Methyl on Elongation and Respiration of Corn (Zea mays) and Soybean (Glycine max) Roots

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John W. Gronwald
John W. Gronwald*
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric Res. Serv. and Dep. Agron. and Plant Genetics, Univ. Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effects of haloxyfop {2-[4-[[3-chloro-5(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl] oxy] phenoxy] propanoic acid} and haloxyfop-methyl on elongation and respiration of primary roots of corn [Zea mays L. ‘B37 X Oh43’] and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Hodgson 78’] were examined. Intact roots of etiolated seedlings were exposed to both forms of the herbicide. At a concentration of 10-6 M, neither form of the herbicide had an effect on elongation or respiration of soybean roots. In contrast, elongation of corn roots was completely inhibited within 24 h of exposure to 10-6 M haloxyfop. This treatment reduced the respiration rate of corn root apices by 30% but had little effect on ATP content. After 72 h of exposure to haloxyfop [10-6 M], both ATP content and respiration rate of corn root apices had declined 35%. Haloxyfop-methyl produced equivalent effects on elongation and respiration of corn roots. Studies with isolated corn root mitochondria indicated that haloxyfop inhibits electron transport at relatively high concentrations (I50 = approximately 2 mM for various substrates). Because significant reductions in ATP content and respiration rate of corn root apices were not detected during the period when elongation was inhibited (initial 24 h of exposure), it is concluded that impairment of respiration is a secondary response to the herbicide.

Keywords

RespirationATPmitochondriamechanism of action
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , March 1986 , pp. 196 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Almeida, F. S., Oliveira, V. F., and Filho, J. M. 1983. Selective control of grass weeds in soyabeans with some recently developed post-emergence herbicides. Trop. Pest. Manage. 29:261–266.Google Scholar
2. Asare-Boamah, N. K. and Fletcher, R. A. 1983. Physiological and cytological effects of BAS-9052-OH on corn (Zea mays) seedlings. Weed Sci. 31:49–55.Google Scholar
3. Barrett, M. and Olson, G. L. 1984. Interaction of Dowco 453 and fluazifop-butyl with auxin responses. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Page 113.Google Scholar
4. Buhler, D. D., Swisher, B. A., and Burnside, O. C. 1985. Behavior of 14C-haloxyfop-methyl in intact plants and cell cultures. Weed Sci. 33:291–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Chance, B. and Williams, G. R. 1955. Respiratory enzymes in oxidative phosphorylation. III. The steady state. J. Biol. Chem. 217:409–427.Google Scholar
6. Cho, H-Y, Widholm, J. M., and Slife, F. W. 1985. Effects of haloxyfop on corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] cell suspension cultures. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Page 82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. DeLuca, M. 1976. Firefly Luciferase. Pages 37–68 in Meister, A., ed. Advances in Enzymology Vol. 44. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
8. Fedtke, C. and Schmidt, R. R. 1977. Chlorfenprop-methyl: its hydrolysis in vivo and in vitro and a new principle for selective herbicidal action. Weed Res. 17:233–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Gilreath, J. P. 1983. Postemergence grass herbicides. Weeds Today 14:3–5.Google Scholar
10. Gruenhagan, R. D. and Moreland, D. E. 1971. Effects of herbicides on ATP levels in excised soybean hypocotyls. Weed Sci. 19:319–323.Google Scholar
11. Hanson, J. B. 1972. Ion transport induced by polycations and its relationship to loose coupling of corn mitochondria. Plant Physiol. 49:707–715.Google Scholar
12. Hendley, P., Dicks, J. W., Monaco, T. J., Slyfield, S. M., Tummon, O. J., and Barrett, J. C. 1985. Translocation and metabolism of pyridinyloxyphenoxypropionate herbicides in rhizomatous quackgrass (Agropyron repens). Weed Sci. 33:11–24.Google Scholar
13. Hill, B. D., Stobbe, E. H., and Jones, B. L. 1978. Hydrolysis of the herbicide benzoylprop ethyl by wild oat esterase. Weed Res. 18:149–154.Google Scholar
14. Hosaka, H., Inabu, H., Satoh, A., and Ishikawa, H. 1984. Morphological and histological effects of sethoxydim on corn (Zea mays) seedlings. Weed Sci. 32:711–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Jain, R. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1983. Morphological and histological effects of sethoxydim, fluazifop-butyl and Dowco 453 on wild oats (Avena fatua). Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Page 73.Google Scholar
16. Kells, J. J., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1984. Absorption, translocation, and activity of fluazifop-butyl as influenced by plant growth stage and environment. Weed Sci. 32:143–149.Google Scholar
17. Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., and Randall, R. J. 1951. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 193:265–275.Google Scholar
18. Parker, C. 1966. The importance of shoot entry in the action of herbicides applied to the soil. Weed Sci. 14:117–121.Google Scholar
19. Pilet, P-E. and Senn, A. 1980. Root growth gradients: a critical analysis. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 99:121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Swisher, B. A. and Corbin, F. T. 1982. Behavior of BAS-9052 OH in soybean (Glycine max) and Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) plant and cell cultures. Weed Sci. 30:640–650.Google Scholar
21. Wiskich, J. T. 1977. Mitochondrial metabolite transport. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 28:45–69.Google Scholar
22. Wright, J. P. and Shimabukuro, R. H. 1983. The use of cell membrane electrical potential measurements to study herbicide mode of action. Plant Physiol. 72. S-19.Google Scholar