Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T03:01:09.867Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Trifluralin on Growth, Nodulation, and Anatomy of Soybeans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Cyril A. Kust
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agronomy
B. Esther Struckmeyer
Affiliation:
Dep. of Horticulture, respectively, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin

Abstract

Effects of α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine (trifluralin) rate and placement in soil on growth and anatomy of soybeans (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) were studied in greenhouses. In 7-week-old plants, trifluralin caused pronounced changes in number and organization of palisade cells in leaves. In fourth internodes, xylem elements of treated plants were less organized and walls of pericycle fibers were extremely thick compared to those of untreated plants. There was starch accumulation in nodules and in xylem elements of the upper root, and binucleate and trinucleate cells were present in tips of tap and lateral roots of treated plants. The effects were more pronounced as rate of trifluralin was increased from 0.36 to 0.74 and to 1.1 kg/ha and when trifluralin was incorporated into the 5 to 15-cm depth rather than the top 5 cm of soil. However, occlusions of xylem vessels in lateral and tap roots were most pronounced at 0.74 kg/ha. Plant topgrowth was reduced more when trifluralin was incorporated into the bottom 10 cm of soil, but root growth inhibition was not affected by trifluralin placement. Trifluralin reduced nodulation of soybeans and seemed to inhibit utilization of cotyledonary reserves and redistribution of organic and mineral constituents of unifoliolate leaves.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Amato, V. A., Hoverson, R. R., and Hacskaylo, J. 1965. Micro-anatomical and morphological responses of corn and cotton to trifluralin. Proc. Assoc. So. Agr. Workers, p. 234 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
2. Anderson, W. P., Richards, A. B., and Whitworth, J. W. 1967. Trifluralin effects on cotton seedlings. Weeds 15:224227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Bayer, D. E., Foy, C. L., Mallory, T. E., and Cutter, E. G. 1967. Morphological and histological effects of trifluralin on root development. Amer. J. Bot. 54:945952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Hacskaylo, J. and Amato, V. A. 1968. Effects of trifluralin on roots of corn and cotton. Weed Sci. 16:513515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Mann, J. D., Jordan, L. S., and Day, B. E. 1965. A survey of herbicides for their effect upon protein synthesis. Plant Physiol. 40:840843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Negi, N. S., Funderburk, H. H. Jr., Schultz, D. P., and Davis, D. E. 1968. Effect of trifluralin and nitralin on mitochondrial activities. Weed Sci. 16:8385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Oliver, L. R. and Frans, R. E. 1968. Inhibition of cotton and soybean roots from incorporated trifluralin and persistence in soil. Weed Sci. 16:199203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Schultz, D. P., Funderburk, H. H. Jr., and Negi, N. S. 1968. Effect of trifluralin on growth, morphology, and nucleic acid synthesis. Plant Physiol. 43:265273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Standifer, L. S. Jr., and Thomas, C. H. 1965. Response of Johnsongrass to soil-incorporated trifluralin. Weeds 13:302306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar