Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:46:07.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Herbicide Combinations for Woody Plant Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. W. Bovey ,
F. S. Davis  and
H. L. Morton
R. W. Bovey
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture
F. S. Davis
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture
H. L. Morton
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We studied 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid (picloram) alone and in combination with 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5-T) or 1,1′-dimethyl-4,4′-bipyridinium salt (paraquat) for control of several greenhouse, nursery, and natural-grown, woody plant species. Picloram:paraquat combinations improved the control of some species such as yaupon (Ilex vomitoria Ait.) as compared to picloram alone at equal rates; but it had an antagonistic effect on huisache (Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd.) and honey mesquite (Prosopis juliflora (Swartz) DC. var. glandulosa (Torr.) Cockerell). Evaluation of picloram: 2,4,5-T combinations suggested that 2,4,5-T sometimes could be added in equal amounts to picloram to increase control or reduce picloram rates proportionately on huisache, honey mesquite and live oak (Quercus virginiana Mill.).

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , July 1968 , pp. 332 - 335
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bouse, L. F. and Bovey, R. W. 1967. A laboratory sprayer for potted plants. Weeds 15:89–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Colby, S. R. 1967. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15:20–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Gowing, D. P. 1959. A method of comparing herbicides and assessing herbicide mixtures at the screening level. Weeds 7:66–76.Google Scholar
4. Kirch, J. H. and Esposito, J. E. 1967. A study of additives to the aqueous phase of aerially applied invert emulsions. Proc. SWC 20:251–255.Google Scholar
5. Meyer, R. E., Morton, H. L., and Flynt, T. O. 1967. A truck sprayer for applying chemical to brush. Weeds 15:286–287.Google Scholar
6. Robinson, E. D. 1967. Response of mesquite to 2,4,5-T, picloram, and 2,4,5-T/picloram combinations. Proc. SWC 20:199. (Abstr.) Google Scholar