Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T16:41:29.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Weed Control Programs in Intensive Cropping Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

N. C. Glaze
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Tifton, GA 31793
C. C. Dowler
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Tifton, GA 31793
A. W. Johnson
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Tifton, GA 31793
D. R. Sumner
Affiliation:
Plant Pathol., Univ. of Georgia, Tifton, GA

Abstract

Six multiple-cropping systems composed of: a) turnip (Brassica campestris spp. rapifera), corn (Zea mays L.), and snapbean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.); b) turnip, peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.), and snapbean; c) turnip, corn, and turnip; d) turnip, peanut, and turnip; e) snapbean, soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], and cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.); and f) turnip, cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.), cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.], and turnip were subjected to nematicide and weed control programs of cultivation or herbicides. Herbicide programs were superior to cultivation in control of weeds. Weeds remaining in the row following cultivation competed severely with crops. Weed species remaining were altered depending on the method of control and crop. Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L. ♯3 CYPES) increased rapidly in all herbicide programs but not in cultivated plots. Pigweeds (Amaranthus spp.) were controlled by herbicides but increased in cultivated plots. Corn, peanut, soybean, and spring snapbean yields were higher in herbicide treatments than in cultivated treatments. Cucumber was the only crop that had increased yields for both main effects, herbicide and nematicide. Turnip was consistently injured in herbicide treatments, which was believed to be caused by residues from previous crops interacting with pathogens and possible allelopathic effects of decaying organic matter.

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Buchanan, G. A., Hoveland, C. S., Brown, V. L., and Wade, R. H. 1975. Weed population shifts influenced by crop rotations and weed control programs. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 28:6071.Google Scholar
2. Burnside, O. C. 1978. Mechanical, cultural and chemical control of weeds in a sorghum-soybean (Sorghum bicolor) – (Glycine max) rotation. Weed Sci. 26:362369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Gallaher, R. N. 1979. Weeds after four years of double cropping. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 32:132136.Google Scholar
4. Hauser, E. W., Dowler, C. C., Jellum, M. D., and Cecil, S. R. 1974. Effects of herbicide-crop rotation on nutsedge, annual weeds and crops. Weed Sci. 22:172176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Standifer, L. C. and Ismail, M. N. B. 1975. A multiple cropping system for vegetable production under subtropical high rainfall conditions. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 100:503506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Sumner, D. R., Glaze, N. C., Dowler, C. C., and Johnson, A. W. 1978. Foliar diseases of turnip grown for greens in intensive cropping systems. Plant Dis. Rep. 62:5155.Google Scholar
7. Sumner, D. R., Johnson, A. W., Glaze, N. C., and Dowler, C. C. 1978. Root diseases of snapbean and southern pea in intensive cropping systems. Phytopathology 68:955961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Sumner, D. R., Glaze, N. C., Dowler, C. C., and Johnson, A. W. 1979. Herbicide treatments and root diseases of turnip in intensive cropping systems. Plant Dis. Rep. 63:801805.Google Scholar
9. Toai, T. V. and Linscott, D. L. 1979. Phytotoxic effect of decaying quackgrass (Agropyron repens) residues. Weed Sci. 27:595598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Weber, J. B., Best, J. A., and Witt, W. W. 1974. Herbicide residues and weed species shifts on modified-soil field plots. Weed Sci. 22:427433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar