Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:09:31.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morphological variation among Gutierrezia sarothrae populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Tracy M. Sterling ,
Leigh W. Murray  and
Yanglin Hou
Leigh W. Murray
Affiliation:
University Statistics Center, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003
Yanglin Hou
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology and Weed Science, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To evaluate relationships among populations, phenotypic variation of morphological characters in one Gutierrezia microcephala and eight Gutierrezia sarothrae populations from New Mexico was quantified and compared with variation expressed when these same populations were grown in a common garden. During flowering, plants were randomly collected from each population across New Mexico during two growing seasons. A common garden of stem cuttings from these same populations was established in Las Cruces. Vegetative and reproductive characters were measured for each population at original and common sites. Vegetative characters did not differ between G. sarothrae and G. microcephala collected from the same location; however, reproductive characters were dissimilar between these two species. Vegetative and reproductive characters differed among G. sarothrae populations at original and common sites between years, although certain populations clustered. Based on morphological characters, more populations clustered when collected from original sites compared to when grown at the common site. Genetics and environment both played a role in the expression of G. sarothrae phenotype when measuring morphological characters; however, G. sarothrae genotypes maintained their general population phenotype expressed at original sites when grown in the common site. Apparently, vegetative and reproductive characters are fairly stable, and the Gutierrezia genotype has more influence on resulting phenotype than the environment in which it grows.

Keywords

Gutierrezia sarothrae (Pursh) Britt. & Rusby GUESA, broom snakeweedGutierrezia microcephala (DC.) Gray GUEMI, threadleaf snakeweedCommon gardenphenotypic variationGUEMIGUESA
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , June 2000 , pp. 356 - 365
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, G. W., Hilley, T. E., Martin, P. G. Jr., Neal, C. R., and Gomez, R. S. 1982. Soil Survey of Colfax County, New Mexico. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 187 p.Google Scholar
Buth, D. G. and Murphy, R. W. 1999. The use of isozyme characters in systematic studies. Biochem. System. Ecol. 27:117–129.Google Scholar
Donart, G. B., Sylvester, D. D., and Hickey, W. C. 1978. Potential Natural Vegetation—New Mexico. New Mexico Interagency Range Committee Report 11. Portland, OR: USDA-SCS. 1 p.Google Scholar
Folks, J. J. 1975. Soil Survey of Santa Fe Area, New Mexico. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 114 p.Google Scholar
Hou, Y. and Sterling, T. M. 1995. Isozyme variation in broom snakeweed (Gutierrezia sarothrae). Weed Sci. 43:156–162.Google Scholar
Kuehl, R. O. 1994. Statistical Principles of Research Design and Analysis. Belmont, CA: Duxbury. pp 87–88.Google Scholar
Lane, M. A. 1980. Systematics of Amphiachyris, Greenella, Gutierrezia, Gymnosperma, Thurovia and Xanthocephalum (Compositae: Astereae). Ph.D. dissertation. University of Texas, Austin, TX. 409 p.Google Scholar
Lane, M. A. 1982. Genetic limits of Xanthocephalum, Gutierrezia, Amphiachyris, Gymnosperma, Greenella, and Thurovia (Compositae: Astereae). Syst. Bot. 7:405–416.Google Scholar
Lane, M. A. 1985. Taxonomy of Gutierrezia (Compositae: Asterceae) in North America. Syst. Bot. 10:7–28.Google Scholar
Ludwig, J. A., Reynolds, J. F., and Whitson, P. D. 1975. Size-biomass relationships of several Chihuahuan desert shrubs. Am. Midl. Nat. 94:451–455.Google Scholar
McDaniel, K. C. and Sosebee, R. E. 1988. Ecology management and poisonous properties associated with perennial snakeweeds. Pages 43–56 In James, L. F., Ralphs, M. H., and Nielson, D. B., eds. The Ecology and Economic Impact of Poisonous Plants on Livestock Production. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
McDaniel, K. C. and Torell, L. A. 1987. Ecology and management of broom snakeweed. Pages 110–115 In Capinera, J. L., ed. Integrated Pest Management of Rangeland: A Shortgrass Prairie Perspective. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Nadabo, S., Pieper, R. D., and Beck, R. F. 1980. Growth patterns and biomass relations of Xanthocephalum sarothrae (Pursh) Shinners on sandy soils in southern New Mexico. J. Range Manage. 33:394–397.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1989a. SAS/STAT® User's Guide. Version 6, 4th ed, Volume 1. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 943 p.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1989b. SAS/STAT® User's Guide. Version 6, 4th ed, Volume 2. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 846 p.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1990. SAS® Procedures Guide. Version 6, 3rd ed. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 705 p.Google Scholar
Smith, D., Steiner, R., Bosland, P., Lownds, N., and Anderson, J. 2000. An integrated analysis of multivariate responses in horticultural studies. Technical Report, University Statistics Center, New Mexico State University, 21 p.Google Scholar
Solbrig, O. T. 1960. Cytotaxonomic and evolutionary studies in the North American species of Gutierrezia (Compositae). Contrib. Gray Herb. 188:1–61.Google Scholar
Solbrig, O. T. 1964. Intraspecific variation in the Gutierrezia sarothrae complex (Compositae-Asteraceae). Contrib. Gray Herb. 193:67–115.Google Scholar
Sterling, T. M. and Hou, Y. 1997. Genetic diversity of broom snakeweed (Gutierrezia sarothrae) and threadleaf snakeweed (G. microcephala) populations. Weed Sci. 45:674–680.Google Scholar
Sterling, T. M., Thompson, D. C., and McDaniel, K. C. 1999. Perennial Snakeweeds. Pages 323–335 In Sheley, R. L. and Petroff, J. K., eds. Biology and Management of Noxious Rangeland Weeds. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, M. T., Cox, D. N., Mickelson, B. C., Rooth, A. J., and Wilson, C. D. 1974. Soil Survey of Lea County, New Mexico. Washington, DC: U.S. Goverment Printing Office. 89 p.Google Scholar
Ueckert, D. N. 1979. Broom snakeweed: effect on short grass forage production and soil water depletion. J. Range Manage. 32:216–219.Google Scholar
Van Devender, T. R. and Spaulding, W. G. 1979. Development of vegetation and climate in the southwestern United States. Science 204:701–710.Google Scholar
Wells, P. V. 1966. Late Pleistocene vegetation and degree of pluvial climatic change in the Chihuahuan desert. Science 153:970–975.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wooten, E. O. 1915. Factors affecting range management in New Mexico. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture Bull. 211. 8 p.Google Scholar