Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T17:36:39.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mortality of Honey Mesquite and Huisache Seedlings from Herbicides and Top Removal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. W. Bovey  and
R. E. Meyer
R. W. Bovey
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. of Agr., Agr. Res. Serv., Dep. of Range Sci., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843
R. E. Meyer
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. of Agr., Agr. Res. Serv., Dep. of Range Sci., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Picloram (4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid), 2,4,5-T [(2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy)acetic acid] and dicamba (3,6-dichloro-o-anisic acid) were sprayed at 0.28 kg/ha on honey mesquite [Prosopis juliflora (Swartz) DC. var. glandulosa (Torr.) Cockerell] and huisache [Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd.] seedlings 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks after emergence from seed under greenhouse conditions. Picloram or 2,4,5-T killed 73% or more of the honey mesquite up to 8 weeks after emergence, but the percent killed declined thereafter. Picloram killed more than 90% of the huisache seedlings when applied from 1 to 8 weeks after emergence. Less than 60% of the honey mesquite or huisache seedlings were killed with dicamba at any treatment date. Clipping the plants at the soil level resulted in high mortality (96 to 100%) of both species 1 to 2 weeks after emergence. Treating regrowth of clipped 1-year-old honey mesquite and huisache with 0.28 kg/ha of picloram, dicamba, or 2,4,5-T produced results similar to those obtained from plants grown from seed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , May 1974 , pp. 276 - 279
Copyright
Copyright © 1974 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bouse, L.F. and Bovey, R.W. 1967. A laboratory sprayer for potted plants. Weeds 15:89–91.Google Scholar
2. Bovey, R.W., Baur, J.R., and Morton, H.L. 1969. Control of huisache and associated woody species in South Texas. J. Range Manage. 23:47–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Bovey, R.W., Davis, F.S., and Morton, H.L. 1968. Herbicide combinations for woody plant control. Weed Sci. 16:332–335.Google Scholar
4. Bovey, R.W., Haas, R.H., and Meyer, R.E. 1972. Daily and seasonal response of huisache and Macartney rose to herbicides. Weed Sci. 20:577–580.Google Scholar
5. Meyer, R.E., Bovey, R.W., Riley, T.E., and McKelvy, W.T. 1972. Leaf removal interval effect after sprays to woody plants. Weed Sci. 20:498–501.Google Scholar
6. Scifres, C.J., Bovey, R.W., and Fisher, C.E. 1973. Chemical control of mesquite. In Advances in Research–Control of Mesquite on Texas Rangelands. Texas A&M Univ., Tex. Agr. Exp. Sta. (In press).Google Scholar
7. Scifres, C.J., Kienast, C.R., and Elrod, D.J. 1972. Honey mesquite seedling growth and 2,4,5-T susceptibility as influenced by shading. J. Range Manage. 26:58–60.Google Scholar
8. Scifres, C.J. and Hahn, R.R. 1971. Response of honey mesquite seedlings to top removal. J. Range Manage. 24:296–298.Google Scholar