Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T17:39:25.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The nature and consequence of weed spread in cropping systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Donald C. Thill  and
Carol A. Mallory-Smith
Carol A. Mallory-Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Weeds spread through movement of seeds and vegetative reproductive propagules. Pollen movement can spread weedy traits, such as herbicide resistance, between related weed and crop species. Weed seeds can spread short or long distances by natural plant dehiscence mechanisms, wind, water, animals, and man&s activities. This symposium paper is a practical review of short-distance spread of weed seeds in and between nearby arable fields and noncrop lands, examining some of the causes of spread and subsequent effects on crop production. Pollen movement, as it affects the spread of herbicide resistance, also is considered a component of short-distance weed spread. Specific weed management options can be used to reduce man-caused weed seed spread within and between nearby fields, thus reducing potential crop yield losses. Long-term management will be more difficult for weed seed spread by natural dispersal mechanisms.

Keywords

Weed seed dispersalherbicide-resistant weedsPowell Amaranth Amaranthus powellii S. Watswild oat Avena fatua L.Kochia Kochia scoparia (L.) Schradprickly lettuce Lactuca serriola L.Russian thistle Salsola iberica Sennen & PauCommon chickweed Stellaria media (L.) VillAMAPOAVEFAKCHSCLACSESASKRSTEME
Type
Symposium
Information
Weed Science , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , June 1997 , pp. 337 - 342
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Alcocer-Ruthling, M., Thill, D. C., and Mallory-Smith, C. A. 1992a. Monitoring the occurrence of sulfonylurea-resistant prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola). Weed Technol. 6: 437–440.Google Scholar
Alcocer-Ruthling, M., Thill, D. C., and Shafii, B. 1992b. Seed biology of sulfonylurea-resistant and -susceptible biotypes of prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola). Weed Technol. 6: 858–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auld, B. A. and Coote, B. G. 1980. A model of a spreading plant population. Oikos 34: 287–292.Google Scholar
Auld, B. A., Menz, K. M., and Monaghan, N. M. 1978/1979. Dynamics of weed spread: implications for policies and public control. Prot. Ecol. 1: 141–148.Google Scholar
Ballaré, C. L., Scopel, A. L., Ghersa, C. M., and Sanchez, R. A. 1987. The population ecology of Datura ferox in soybean crops. A simulation approach incorporating seed dispersal. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 19: 177–188.Google Scholar
Burrows, F. M. 1986. The aerial motion of seeds, fruits, spores, and pollen. in Murray, D. R., ed. Seed Dispersal. Sydney, Australia: Academic Press, pp. 1–47.Google Scholar
Crompton, C. W. and Bassett, I. J. 1985. The biology of Canadian weeds. 65. Salsola pestifer A. Nels. Can. J. Plant Sci. 65: 379–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darmency, H. 1994. Genetics of herbicide resistance in weeds and crops. in Powles, S. B. and Holtum, J.A.M., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. Biology and Biochemistry. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers, pp. 263–297.Google Scholar
Dewey, S. A., Thill, D. C., and Foote, P. W. 1985. Weed Seed Contamination of Cereal Grain Seedlots—A Drillbox Survey. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho Current Information Series No. 767. 2 p.Google Scholar
Dewey, S. A. and Whitesides, R. E. 1990. Weed seed analysis from four decades of Utah small grain drillbox surveys. Proc. Western Soc. Weed Sci. 43: 69.Google Scholar
Donald, W. W. and Ogg, A. G. Jr. 1991. Biology and control of jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica), a review. Weed Technol. 5: 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberlein, C. V., Al-Khatib, K., Guttieri, M. J., and Fuerst, E. P. 1992. Distribution and characteristics of triazine-resistant Powell Amaranth (Amaranthus powellii) in Idaho. Weed Sci. 40: 507–512.Google Scholar
Ennos, R. A. 1994. Estimating the relative rates of pollen and seed migration among plant populations. Heredity 72: 250–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fay, P. K. 1990. A brief overview of the biology and distribution of weeds in wheat. in Donald, W. W., ed. Systems of Weed Control in Wheat in North America. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America Monograph Series No. 6, pp. 33–50.Google Scholar
Ghersa, C. M., Martinez-Ghersa, M. A., Satorre, E. H., Van Esso, M. L., and Chichotky, G. 1993. Seed dispersal, distribution and recruitment of seedlings of Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. Weed Res. 33: 79–88.Google Scholar
Ghersa, C. M. and Roush, M. L. 1993. Searching for solutions to weed problems. Do we study competition or dispersion? BioScience 43: 104–109.Google Scholar
González-Andujar, J. L. and Perry, J. N. 1995. Models for the herbicidal control of the seed bank of Avena sterilis: the effects of spatial and temporal heterogeneity and of dispersal. J. Appl. Ecol. 32: 578–587.Google Scholar
Haberlandt, G. 1914. Physiological Plant Anatomy. London: MacMillan. 777 p.Google Scholar
Harper, J. L. 1977. Population Biology of Plants. London: Academic Press, pp. 33–60.Google Scholar
Horne, F. R. 1953. The significance of weed seed in relation to crop production. Proc. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf. 1: 372–399.Google Scholar
Howard, C. L., Mortimer, A. M., Gould, P., and Putwain, P. D. 1991. The dispersal of weeds: seed movement in arable agriculture. Proc. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf. 2: 821–828.Google Scholar
Jordan, N. 1992. Weed demography and population dynamics: implications for threshold management. Weed Technol. 6: 184–190.Google Scholar
Keeler, K. H., Turner, C. E., and Bolick, M. R. 1996. Movement of crop transgenes into wild plants. in Duke, S. O., ed. Herbicide-Resistant Crops. Agricultural, Environmental, Economic, Regulatory, and Technical Aspects. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers, pp. 303–330.Google Scholar
Mallory-Smith, C. A., Thill, D. C., and Dial, M. J. 1990. Identification of sulfonylurea herbicide resistant prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola). Weed Technol. 4: 163–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, E.J.P. 1989. Distribution patterns of plants associated with arable field edges. J. Appl. Ecol. 26: 247–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, B. D. and Ghersa, C. 1992. The influence of weed seed dispersal versus the effect of competition on crop yield. Weed Technol. 6: 196–204.Google Scholar
McCanny, S. J. and Cavers, P. B. 1988. Spread of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) in Ontario, Canada. II. Dispersal by combines. Weed Res. 28: 67–72.Google Scholar
Morrison, I. N. and Devine, M. D. 1994. Herbicide resistance in the Canadian prairie provinces: five years after the fact. Phytoprotection 75(Suppl.): 5–16.Google Scholar
Mt. Pleasant, J. and Schlather, K. J. 1994. Incidence of weed seed in cow (Bos sp.) manure and its importance as a weed source for cropland. Weed Technol. 8: 304–310.Google Scholar
Mulugeta, D., Maxwell, B. D., Fay, P. K., and Dyer, W. E. 1994. Kochia (Kochia scoparia) pollen dispersal, viability and germination. Weed Sci. 42: 548–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, D. R. 1986. Seed Dispersal. Sydney, Australia: Academic Press, 322 p.Google Scholar
Petzold, K. 1955. Combine-harvesting and weeds. Landtechnik 10: 468–470.Google Scholar
Plummer, G. L. and Keever, C. 1963. Autumnal daylight weather and camphor-weed dispersal in the Georgia Piedmont region. Bot. Gaz. 124: 283–289.Google Scholar
Saari, L. L., Cotterman, J. C., Smith, W. F., and Primiani, M. M. 1992. Sulfonylurea herbicide resistance in common chickweed, perennial ryegrass, and Russian thistle. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 42: 110–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saari, L. L., Cotterman, J. C., and Thill, D. C. 1994. Resistance to acetolactate synthase inhibiting herbicides. in Powles, S. B. and Holtum, J.A.M., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants: Ecology and Mechanisms. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 83–139.Google Scholar
Seefeldt, S. S., Gealy, D. R., Brewster, B. D., and Fuerst, E. P. 1994. Cross-resistance of several diclofop resistant wild oat (Avena fatua) biotypes from the Willamette Valley of Oregon. Weed Sci. 42: 430–437.Google Scholar
Smith, L. M. II, and Kok, L. T. 1984. Dispersal of musk thistle (Carduus nutans) seeds. Weed Sci. 32: 120–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stallings, G. P., Thill, D. C., and Mallory-Smith, C. A. 1994. Sulfonylurea-resistant Russian thistle (Salsola iberica) survey in Washington state. Weed Technol. 8: 258–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stallings, G. P., Thill, D. C., Mallory-Smith, C. A., and Lass, L. W. 1995a. Plant movement and seed dispersal of Russian thistle (Salsola iberica). Weed Sci. 43: 63–69.Google Scholar
Stallings, G. P., Thill, D. C., Mallory-Smith, C. A., and Shafii, B. 1995b. Pollen-mediated gene flow of sulfonylurea-resistant kochia (Kochia scoparia). Weed Sci. 43: 95–102.Google Scholar
Thill, D. C. 1996. Managing the spread of herbicide resistance. in Duke, S. O., ed. Herbicide-Resistant Crops. Agricultural, Environmental, Economic, Regulatory, and Technical Aspects. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers, pp. 331–337.Google Scholar
Thill, D. C. and Mallory-Smith, C. A. 1996. Case study 2: management of ALS-inhibitor herbicide-resistant Kochia scoparia in North America. in Proceedings of the Second International Weed Control Congress. Flakkebjerg, DK: Department of Weed Control and Pest Ecology, 399-405.Google Scholar
Thompson, C. R., Thill, D. C., Mallory-Smith, C. A., and Shafii, B. 1994. Characteristics of chlorsulfuron resistant and susceptible kochia (Kochia scoparia). Weed Technol. 8: 470–476.Google Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture, Federal Grain Inspection Service. 1995. United States standards for wheat. in Code of Federal Regulation, Parts 700 to 899. Washington, DC: National Archives and Records Administration, pp. 582–584.Google Scholar
van der Pijl, L. 1969. Principles of Dispersal in Higher Plants. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 153 p.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. J. and Aebischer, N. J. 1995. The distribution of dicotyledonous arable weeds in relation to distance from the field edge. J. Appl. Ecol. 32: 295–310.Google Scholar
Yenish, J. P., Doll, J. D., and Buhler, D. D. 1992. Effects of tillage on vertical distribution and viability of weed seeds in soil. Weed Sci. 40: 429–433.Google Scholar
Young, F. L. 1986. Russian thistle (Salsola iberica) growth and development in wheat. Weed Sci. 34: 901–905.Google Scholar
Young, F. L. 1988. Effect of Russian thistle (Salsola iberica) interference on spring wheat. Weed Sci. 36: 594–598.Google Scholar
Young, F., Veseth, R., Thill, D., Shillinger, W., and Ball, D. 1995. Managing Russian Thistle Under Conservation Tillage in Crop-fallow Rotations. Pacific Northwest Bull. 492. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho, 12 p.Google Scholar