Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T17:08:16.383Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Persistence of Fluridone in Five Georgia Soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Jill Schroeder  and
Philip A. Banks
Jill Schroeder
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Univ. Georgia, Athens, GA 30602
Philip A. Banks
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Univ. Georgia, Athens, GA 30602
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field research was conducted in 1982 and 1983 to characterize the persistence of fluridone {1-methyl-3-phenyl-5-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-4(1H)pyridinone} in five Georgia soils. Fluridone persisted less than 365 days in all soils, with shorter persistence upon reapplication in 1983 which indicated the potential for enhanced microbial degradation. A significantly higher rate of loss in 1983 compared to 1982 was recorded in the Greenville sandy clay and Dothan loamy sand soils. A higher rate of loss was recorded for the 1.7 kg ai/ha than the 0.6 kg/ha treatment in the Bradson clay loam and Rome gravelly clay loam soils. No grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. ‘BR 64’) injury was observed in a field bio assay planted in the spring of 1984. Herbicide leaching did not appear to be an important method of loss.

Keywords

Accelerated degradation
Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Information
Weed Science , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , July 1986 , pp. 612 - 616
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Alexander, M. 1977. Introduction to Soil Microbiology. 2d ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 467 pp.Google Scholar
2. Audus, L. J. 1949. Biological detoxication of 2,4-D. Plant Soil 2:31–35.Google Scholar
3. Banks, P. A., Ketchersid, M. L., and Merkle, M. G. 1979. The persistence of fluridone under field and controlled conditions. Weed Sci. 27:631–633.Google Scholar
4. Banks, P. A. and Merkle, M. G. 1979. Field evaluations of the herbicidal effects of fluridone on two soils. Agron. J. 71:759–762.Google Scholar
5. Banks, P. A. and Merkle, M. G. 1979. Soil detection and mobility of fluridone. Weed Sci. 27:309–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Obrigawitch, T., Wilson, R. G., Martin, A. R., and Roeth, F. W. 1982. The inflluence of temperature, moisture, and prior EPTC application on the degradation of EPTC in soils. Weed Sci. 30: 175–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Schroeder, J. and Banks, P. A. 1986. Persistence and activity of norflurazon and fluridone in five Georgia soils under controlled conditions. Weed Sci. 34:599–606.Google Scholar
8. Shea, P. J. and Weber, J. B. 1983. Effect of soil pH on fluridone activity and persistence as determined by chlorophyll measurements. Weed Sci. 31:347–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Waldrep, T. W. and Taylor, H. M. 1976. 1-methyl-3-phenyl-5-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-4(1H)-pyridinone. A new herbicide. J. Agric. Food Chem. 24:1250–1251.Google Scholar
10. Wilson, R. G. 1984. Accelerated degradation of thiocarbamate herbicides in soil with prior thiocarbamate herbicide exposure. Weed Sci. 32:264–268.Google Scholar