Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T11:31:30.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Plant invasions—process and patterns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Steven R. Radosevich ,
M. M. Stubbs  and
Claudio M. Ghersa
M. M. Stubbs
Affiliation:
Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331
Claudio M. Ghersa
Affiliation:
University of Buenos Aires, Argentina
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Plant invasions that arise from human introductions of new species to a region, or from range expansion of some native plant species, can profoundly affect biodiversity and alter the structure and function of ecosystems. Although preventive strategies may be an effective way to limit plant invasions, they are difficult to achieve because adequate descriptions of biological and environmental characteristics are often lacking, and truly predictive models of invasive biology have been elusive. On the basis of a history of repeated plant introductions and the absence of a general predictive theory, it may be best to assume that plant invasions will continue. This paper explores ways to empirically study and to predict plant invasions through a study of the invasion process. Several approaches are explored, such as species demography, DNA analysis, and geographic information system reconstructions, to characterize source and satellite populations and factors that influence the spread of these populations.

Keywords

Invasion processrisk assessment
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , April 2003 , pp. 254 - 259
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Andow, D. A., Kareiva, P. M., Levin, S. A., and Okubo, A. 1990. Spread of invading organisms. Landsc. Ecol. 4:177–188.Google Scholar
Auld, B. A. and Coote, B. G. 1980. A model of a spreading plant population. Oikos 34:287–292.Google Scholar
Baker, H. G. 1986. Patterns of plant invasion in North America. Pages 44–58 In Mooney, H. A. and Drake, J. A., eds. Ecology of Biological Invasions of North America and Hawaii. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Betancourt, J. L., VanDevender, T. R., and Martin, P. S. 1990. Fossil Packrat Middens: The last 40,000 Years of Biotic Change in the Arid West. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press. pp. 259–289.Google Scholar
Collins, S. L. and Glenn, S. M. 1997. Effects of organismal and distance scaling on analysis of species distribution and abundance. Ecol. Appl. 7:543–551.Google Scholar
Cousens, R. and Mortimer, M. 1995. Dynamics of Weed Populations. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 21–54.Google Scholar
Crawley, M. J. 1987. What makes a community invasible? Pages 429–454 In Gray, A. J., Crawley, M. J., and Edwards, P. J., eds. Colonization, Succession and Stability. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Cronk, Q.C.B. and Fuller, J. L. 1995. Plant Invaders, a ‘People and Plants’ Conservation Manual. London: Chapman and Hall. 45 p.Google Scholar
Crosby, A. W. 1986. Ecological Imperialism, The biological expansion of Europe, 900–1900. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 145–170.Google Scholar
D’Antonio, C. M. and Vitousek, P. M. 1992. Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23:63–87.Google Scholar
Enserink, M. 1999. Biological invaders sweep in. Science 285:1834–1836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewel, J. J., O’Dowd, D., Borgelson, J., and Curtis, C. C. 1999. Deliberate introductions of species: research needs. Bioscience 49:619–630.Google Scholar
Forcella, F. and Harvey, S. J. 1983. Relative abundance in an alien weed flora. Oecologia 59:292–295.Google Scholar
Forman, R.T.T. 1995. Land Mosaics, The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 393–397.Google Scholar
Ghersa, C. M. and León, R.J.C. 1999. Successional changes in the agroecosystems of the Rolling Pampas. Pages 487–502 In Walker, L. R., ed. Ecosystems of Disturbed Ground. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Ghersa, C. M., Satorre, E. H., Benech Arnold, R. L., and Martínez-Ghersa, M. A. 2000. Advances in weed management strategies. Field Crops Res. 67:95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grime, J. P., Thompson, K., Hunt, R. et al. 1997. Integrated screening validates primary axes of specialization in plants. Oikos 79:259–281.Google Scholar
Groves, R. H. 1986. Invasion of Mediterranean ecosystems by weeds. Pages 129–145 In Dell, B., Hopkins, A.J.M., and Lamont, B. B., eds. Resilience in Mediterranean-Type Ecosystems. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Junk.Google Scholar
Harper, J. L. 1977. The Population Biology of Plants. London: Academic Press. pp. 1111–1113.Google Scholar
Hastings, A. and Wolin, C. L. 1989. Within patch dynamics in a metapopulation. Ecology 70:1261–1266.Google Scholar
Hodkinson, D. J. and Thompson, K. 1997. Plant dispersal: the role of man. J. Appl. Ecol. 34:1484–1496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, E. E., Lewis, M. A., Banks, J. E., and Veit, R. R. 1994. Partial differential equations in ecology: spatial interactions and population dynamics. Ecology 75:17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huenneke, L. F., Hamburg, S. P., Koide, R., Mooney, H. A., and Vitousek, P. M. 1990. Effects of soil resources on plant invasion and community structure in Californian serpentine grassland. Ecology 71:478–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husband, B. C. and Barrett, C. H. 1996. A metapopulation perspective in plant population biology. J. Ecol. 84:461–469.Google Scholar
Jeltsch, F., Milton, S. J., Dean, W.R.J., van Rooyen, N., and Moloney, K. A. 1998. Modelling the impact of small scale heterogeneities on tree-grass coexistence in semi-arid savannas. J. Ecol. 86:780–793.Google Scholar
Kot, M., Lewis, M. A., and Van den Drissche, P. 1996. Dispersal data and the spread of invading organisms. Ecology 77:2027–2042.Google Scholar
Latore, J., Gould, P., and Mortimer, A. M. 1998. Spatial dynamics and critical patch size of annual plant populations. J. Theor. Biol. 190:277–285.Google Scholar
Mack, R. N. 1995. Invading plants: their potential contribution to population biology. Pages 127–142 In White, J., ed. Studies in Plant Demography. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mack, R. N. and Thompson, J. N. 1982. Evolution in steppe with few large, hooved mammals. Am. Nat. 119:757–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, B. D., Wilson, M. V., and Radosevich, S. R. 1988. Population modeling approach for evaluating leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) development and control. Weed Technol. 2:132–138.Google Scholar
Moody, M. E. and Mack, R. N. 1988. Controlling the spread of plant invasions: the importance of nascent foci. J. Appl. Ecol. 25:1009–1021.Google Scholar
Nilson, E. T. and Muller, C. H. 1980. A comparison of the relative naturalization ability of two Schinis species in Southern California. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 107:51–56.Google Scholar
NRCS. 1997. National Range and Pasture Handbook. USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service Grazing Lands Institute, 190-vi-NRPH, September 1997, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
NRCS. 1998. National Forestry Manual, 190, September 1998, http://nsscnt.nssc.nrcs.usda.gov/nfm/index.htm.Google Scholar
Panetta, F. D. and Mitchell, N. D. 1991. Homoclime analysis and the prediction of weediness. Weed Res. 31:273–284.Google Scholar
Radosevich, S. R., Holt, J., and Ghersa, C. M. 1997. Weed Ecology, Implications for Management. New York: J. Wiley. pp. 114–160.Google Scholar
Rannala, B. and Mountain, J. L. 2000. Detecting immigration by using multilocus genotypes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94:9197–9201.Google Scholar
Rejmanek, M. and Richardson, D. M. 1996. What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77:1655–1661.Google Scholar
Sauer, J. D. 1988. Plant Migration. The Dynamics of Geographic Patterning in seed Plant Species. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 3 p.Google Scholar
Silvertown, J. W. and Lovett-Doust, J. 1993. Introduction to Plant Population Biology. London: Blackwell Scientific. pp. 107–115.Google Scholar
Skellman, J. G. 1951. Random dispersal in theoretical populations. Biomatrika 38:196–218.Google Scholar
Solbrig, O. T. ed. 1980. Demography and Evolution in Plant Populations. Botanical Monographs 15. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. pp. 118 and 181.Google Scholar
Takenaka, Y., Matsuda, H., and Iwasa, Y. 1997. Competition and evolutionary stability of plants in a spatially structured habitat. Res. Popul. Ecol. 39:67–75.Google Scholar
Tilman, D. 1997. Community invisibility, recruitment limitation, and grassland biodiversity. Ecology 78:81–92.Google Scholar
Walker, J., Sharpe, P.J.H., Penridge, L. K., and Wu, H. 1989. Ecological field theory: the concept and field tests. Vegetatio 83:81–95.Google Scholar
Watson, A. K. 1985. Integrated management of leafy spurge. Pages 93–104 In Watson, , ed. Leafy Spurge. Champaign, IL: Weed Sci. Soc. Am.Google Scholar
Williamson, M. 1996. Biological Invasions. London: Chapman & Hall. 244 p.Google Scholar
Zamora, D. L. and Thill, D. C. 1999. Early detection and eradication of new weed infestations. Pages 73–84 In Sheley, R. L. and Petroff, J. K., eds. Biology and Management of Noxious Rangeland Weeds. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press. pp. 73–84.Google Scholar