Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T04:23:32.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Polymeric Resins Adsorb and Release Oryzalin in Response to pH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Glenn B. Fain ,
Timothy L. Grey ,
Glenn R. Wehtje ,
Charles H. Gilliam  and
Jason A. Osborne
Glenn B. Fain*
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Southern Horticultural Laboratory, P.O. Box 287 Poplarville, MS 39470
Timothy L. Grey
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Crop Science, The University of Georgia, Plant Science Building, 115 Coastal Way Tifton, GA 31794
Glenn R. Wehtje
Affiliation:
Agronomy and Soils Department, 201 Funchess Hall Auburn University, AL 36849
Charles H. Gilliam
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, 101 Funchess Hall Auburn University, AL 36849
Jason A. Osborne
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, 16 Patterson Hall Campus Box 8203 Raleigh, NC 27695
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: gfain@ars.usda.gov
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two polymeric anion-exchange resins and one sorbent resin were evaluated for their propensity to adsorb, and subsequently desorb, oryzalin. The intent was to determine whether these resins could adsorb and subsequently release oryzalin in a manner that would render these resins as an option for slow-release herbicide delivery. The dinitroaniline herbicide oryzalin is weakly acidic with a dissociation constant (pK a) of 8.6. An additional objective was to determine whether altering the pH between sorption and desorption would enhance the desired performance. Maximum oryzalin sorption by the two anion-exchange resins was between 127 and 132 mg g−1 ai. The sorbent resin was adsorbed at a maximum concentration of 191 mg g−1 ai. Maximum sorption occurred with the pH 10 solutions with all resins. Average oryzalin desorption by the anion-exchange resin was between 0.12 and 3.84 mg g−1 per desorption event. Maximum desorption occurred at pH 6.0. Results reveal that the resins evaluated may have merit for slow-release herbicide delivery.

Keywords

OryzalinHerbicideadsorptioncontainer-grown plantsnursery
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 55 , Issue 2 , April 2007 , pp. 157 - 163
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Abernathy, J. R. and Wax, L. M. 1973. Bentazon mobility and absorption in twelve Illinois soils. Weed Sci. 21:224–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous, , 1998a. Purolite A300 exchange resin data sheet. Philadelphia The Purolite Company, Division of Bio-Tech Corporation.Google Scholar
Anonymous, , 1998b. Purolite A400 exchange resin data sheet. Philadelphia The Purolite Company, Division of Bio-Tech Corporation.Google Scholar
Anonymous, , 1998c. Purolite MN400 sorbent resin data sheet. Philadelphia The Purolite Company, Division of Bio-Tech Corporation.Google Scholar
Appleton, B. L. and Derr, J. F. 1990. Use of geotextile disks for container weed control. Hortscience. 25:666–668.Google Scholar
Crossan, C. K., Gilliam, C. H., Keever, G. J., Eakes, D. J., Wehtje, G. R., and Dozier, W. A. Jr. 1997. Weed control in container-grown crops with herbicide-coated fertilizers. J. Environ. Hortic. 15:138–141.Google Scholar
Dayan, F. E., Armstrong, B. M., and Weete, J. D. 1998. Inhibitory activity of sulfentrazone and its metabolic derivatives on soybean (Glycine max) protoporphyrinogen oxidase. J. Agric. Food Chem. 46:2024–2029.Google Scholar
Dewar, F. E., Zoebisch, E. G., Healy, E. F., and Stewart, J. P. 1985. AM1: a new general purpose quantum mechanical molecular model. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 107:3902–3909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fain, G. B., Gilliam, C. H., Wehtje, G. R., Grey, T. L., Osborne, J. A., and Tilt, K. M. 2003. Evaluation of experimental extended-delivery granular preemergent herbicide formulations for direct application to nursery containers. J. Environ. Hortic. 21:1–5.Google Scholar
Fretz, T. A. 1973. Herbicide impregnated mulches for weed control in container nursery stock. Sci. Hortic. (Amst.) 1:165–170.Google Scholar
Gilliam, C. H., Fare, D. C., and Beasley, A. 1992. Nontarget losses from application of granular Ronstar to container nurseries. J. Environ. Hortic. 10:175–176.Google Scholar
Gilliam, C. H., Foster, W. J., Adrain, J. L., and Shumack, R. L. 1990. A survey of weed control costs and strategies in container production nurseries. J. Environ. Hortic. 8:133–135.Google Scholar
Gingerich, L. L. and Zimdahl, R. L. 1976. Persistence of isopropalin and oryzalin. Weed Sci. 24:431–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, P. B. and Beach, S. 2001. Oxadiazon, oryzalin, and oxyfluorfen residues in container plant nurseries. Hortscience. 36:900–904.Google Scholar
Gorski, S. F., Reiners, S., and Ruizzo, M. A. 1989. Release rate of three herbicides from controlled-release tablets. Weed Technol. 3:349–352.Google Scholar
Graper, L. K. and Rainey, D. P. 1989. Aerobic metabolism of 14C -oryzalin in sandy loam soil. Indianapolis DowElanco.Google Scholar
Grey, T. L., Walker, R. H., Wehtje, G. R., Dayan, F. E., Weete, J. D., Hancock, H. G., and Kwon, O. 2000. Behavior of sulfentrazone in ionic exchange resins, electrophoresis gels, and cation-saturated soils. Weed Sci. 48:239–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, R. G. 1974. Soil adsorption and volatility of dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci. 22:120–124.Google Scholar
Keel, K. R., Gilliam, C. H., Wehtje, G. R., Grey, T. L., Keever, G. J., and Eakes, D. J. 1998. Herbicide adsorption and release properties of five oxidiazon-coated fertilizers. J. Environ. Hortic. 16:230–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keese, R. J., Camper, N. D., Whitwell, T., Riley, M. B., and Wilson, P. C. 1994. Herbicide runoff from ornamental container nurseries. J. Environ. Qual. 23:320–324.Google Scholar
Koncal, J. J., Gorski, S. F., and Fretz, T. A. 1981. Slow-release herbicide formulation for weed control in container-grown plants. Hortscience. 16:83–84.Google Scholar
Krieger, M. S., Merritt, D. A., Wolt, J. D., and Patterson, W. L. 1998. Concurrent patterns of sorption–degradation for oryzalin and degradates. J. Agric. Food Chem. 46:3292–3299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loux, M. M., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Adsorption of imazaquin and imazethapyr on soils, sediments, and selected adsorbents. Weed Sci. 37:712–718.Google Scholar
Mathers, H. M. 2003. Novel methods of weed control in containers. Horttech. 13:28–34.Google Scholar
Porter, W. C. and Parish, R. L. 1993. Nontarget losses of granular herbicide applied to container-grown plants. J. Environ. Hortic. 11:143–146.Google Scholar
Rao, P. V. 1998. Statistical Research Methods in the Life Sciences. Pacific Grove, CA Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Robinson, E. L. 1982. The effect of soil pH on the activity of oryzalin and metribuzin on five common weeds in no-till crop production. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 13:987–994.Google Scholar
W.K. Vencill. 2002. Herbicide Handbook. 8th ed. Champaign, IL Weed Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Verma, B. P. and Smith, A. E. 1978. Commercially pressed controlled release metolachlor tablets. South. Nursery Assoc. Res. Conf. 23:183–185.Google Scholar
Wauchope, R. D., Buttler, T. M., Hornsby, A. G., Augustijn-Beckers, P. W. M., and Burt, J. P. 1992. The SCS/CES pesticide properties database for environmental decision making. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 123:1–164.Google Scholar
Weber, J. B. 1970. Mechanisms of adsorption of s-triazines by clay colloids and factors affecting planting availability. Pages 93–130. in Gunther, F.A., Gunther, J.D. eds. Residue Reviews. Volume 32. New York Springer-Verla.Google Scholar
Weber, J. B. and Monaco, T. J. 1972. Review of the chemical and physical properties of the substituted dinitroaniline herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 25:31–37.Google Scholar
Wehtje, G. R., Gilliam, C. H., and Hajek, B. F. 1993. Adsorption, desorption, and leaching of oxidiazon in container media and soil. Hortscience. 28:126–128.Google Scholar
Wehtje, G. R., Gilliam, C. H., and Hajek, B. F. 1994. Adsorption, desorption, and leaching of oryzalin in container media and soil. Hortscience. 29:824.Google Scholar
Wehtje, G. R., Walker, R. H., and Shaw, J. N. 2000. Pesticide retention by inorganic soil amendments. Weed Sci. 48:248–254.Google Scholar
Wilen, C. A., Schuch, U. K., and Elmore, C. L. 1999. Mulches and subirrigation control weeds in container production. J. Environ. Hortic. 17:174–180.Google Scholar