Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T19:53:14.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Translocation of Dipropetryn and Prometryn in Seedlings and Excised Leaves of Oats (Avena sativa) and Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

E. Basler
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74074
D. S. Murray
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74074
P. W. Santelmann
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74074

Abstract

The absorption of 14C-dipropetryn (2-ethylthio-4,6-bis-isopropylamine-s-triazine) and 14C-prometryn [2,4-bis(isopropylamino)-6-(methylthio)-s-triazine] by roots of intact seedlings of corn (Zea mays L. ‘Iowa Chief) and oats (Avena sativa L. ‘Cimarron’) was very extensive and occurred to about the same degree in both species after application to the root medium. The translocation of 14C-label of dipropetryn to the shoots was low in corn as compared to oats. Prometryn 14C-label was more readily translocated to the tops of corn than dipropetryn and was more readily translocated in oats than corn. Dipropetryn 14C-label entered excised leaves through the transpiration stream during a short exposure period and translocated to a greater extent in oats than in corn. The 14C-label of dipropetryn became immobilized in excised leaves after about 4 h. The 14C-label of prometryn was initially more mobile in excised leaves of oats than corn. However, translocation of the 14C-label of prometryn continued in both species during 10 h of treatment and there was very little difference in the final distribution pattern. DNP (2,4-dinitrophenol) did not affect the distribution pattern of the 14C-label of dipropetryn or prometryn in corn after 10 h treatments.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1978 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Dudek, C., Basler, E., and Santelmann, P. W. 1973. Absorption and translocation of terbutryn and propazine. Weed Sci. 21:440443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Eastin, E. F. and Basler, E. 1977. Absorption, translocation, and degradation of herbicides by plants. In Truelove, B., ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. Southern Weed Science Society.Google Scholar
3. Murray, D. S., Santelmann, P. W., and Davidson, J. H. 1975. Comparative absorption, desorption and mobility of dipropetryn and prometryn in soil. J. Agric. and Food Chem. 23:578582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Orwick, P. L., Schreiber, M. M., and Hodges, T. K. 1976. Absorption and efflux of chloro-s-triazines by Setaria roots. Weed Res. 16:139144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Robinson, D. E. and Greene, D. W. 1976. Metabolism and differential susceptibility of crabgrass and witchgrass to simazine and atrizine. Weed Sci. 24:500504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Sheets, T. J. 1961. Uptake and distribution of simazine by oats and cotton seedlings. Weeds 9:113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Sikka, J. C. and Davis, D. E. 1968. Absorption, translocation and metabolism of prometryne in cotton and soybeans. Weed Sci. 16:474477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Van Bel, A. J. E. 1976. Different mass transfer rates of labeled sugars and tritiated water in xylem vessels and their dependency on metabolism. Plant Physiol. 57:911914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed