Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-17T19:13:25.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variability in Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and Reproduction Beyond Its Current Range in North America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert N. Andersen ,
Robert M. Menges  and
Jeffery S. Conn
Robert N. Andersen
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Dep. Agron., and Plant Genetics, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Robert M. Menges
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., P. O. Box 267, Weslaco, TX 78576
Jeffery S. Conn
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Univ. of Alaska, Fairbanks, AK 99701
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The general appearance of plants was similar for 14 accessions of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medic. ♯ ABUTH) obtained from Stoneville, MS (33° 25’ N), Rosemount, MN (44° 43’ N), and various locations in between. All accessions were equally susceptible to bentazon [3-isopropyl-1H-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxide]. Variation in maturity characteristics was found among the accessions in the field at Rosemount; southern accessions began seed capsule production later and continued it longer than did northern accessions. Velvetleaf accessions from Stoneville and Rosemount both produced seeds in the field at Weslaco, TX (26° 09’ N), but at Fairbanks, AK (64° 49’ N), neither accession produced seeds before being killed by frost.

Keywords

MaturitybentazonABUTH
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , July 1985 , pp. 507 - 512
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Branton, C. I. and Shaw, R. H. 1973. Growing-degree units for selected agricultural locations in Alaska. Univ. Alaska, Agric. Exp. Stn., Fairbanks. Tech. Bull. 4. 25 pp.Google Scholar
2. Chandrabose, M. 1973. Two noteworthy flowering plants from south India. Bull. Bot. Surv. India 15(1 and 2): 160–162.Google Scholar
3. Colton, C. E. and Einhellig, F. A. 1980. Alleopathic mechanisms of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medic., Malvaceae) on soybean. Am. J. Bot. 67:1407–1413.Google Scholar
4. Gressel, J. G. and Holm, L. G. 1964. Chemical inhibition of crop germination by weed seeds and the nature of inhibition by Abutilon theophrasti . Weed Res. 4:44–53.Google Scholar
5. List, R. J. 1958. Smithsonian meterological tables. Smith. Misc. Collections 114:506–516.Google Scholar
6. Oliver, L. R. 1979. Influence of soybean (Glycine max) planting date on velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) competition. Weed Sci. 27:183–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Steinbauer, G. P. and Grigsby, B. 1959. Methods of obtaining field and laboratory germination of seeds of bindweeds, lady's thumb and velvetleaf. Weeds 7:41–46.Google Scholar