Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T16:52:27.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of SAN 582 on sethoxydim efficacy in johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) and soybean (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert C. Scott
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762
David R. Shaw*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Science, Box 9555, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State
Randall L. Ratliff
Affiliation:
Novartis Crop Protection, Greensboro, NC 27419
*
Corresponding author. dshaw@weedscience.msstate.edu

Abstract

Laboratory studies were conducted to determine the effect of SAN 582 on the absorption, translocation, and metabolism of sethoxydim in johnsongrass and soybean. 14C-sethoxydim absorption in johnsongrass and soybean was enhanced 4 h after application when tank mixed with SAN 582. Absorption in johnsongrass increased from 18% with 14C-sethoxydim applied alone to 65% when applied with SAN 582. Absorption in soybean increased from 30% with 14C-sethoxydim applied alone to 83% when applied with SAN 582. The addition of crop oil concentrate also enhanced foliar absorption of 14C-sethoxydim. Eight hours after application, foliar absorption in johnsongrass increased from 22% with 14C-sethoxydim applied alone to 61% when 14C-sethoxydim was applied with crop oil concentrate. Foliar absorption in soybean increased from 38% with 14C-sethoxydim applied alone to 59% when 14C-sethoxydim was applied with crop oil concentrate. When 14C-sethoxydim was applied in combination with crop oil concentrate and SAN 582, foliar absorption was 84% or more in both johnsongrass and soybean 4 h after application and did not increase over time. Minor differences in translocation were observed, but these differences were not sufficient to account for the increase in foliar activity observed when SAN 582 is tank mixed with sethoxydim. SAN 582 did not affect metabolism of sethoxydim in either species. Based on these data, it appears that SAN 582 increases the efficacy of sethoxydim by enhancing foliar absorption.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Banks, P. A. and Tripp, T. N. 1983. Control of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) in soybean (Glycine max) with foliar-applied herbicides. Weed Sci. 31: 628633.Google Scholar
Burton, J. D., Gronwald, J. W., Somers, D. A., Connelly, J. A., Gengenbach, B. G., and Wyse, D. L. 1987. Inhibition of plant acetyl-Coenzyme A carboxylase by the herbicides sethoxydim and haloxyfop. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 148: 10391044.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. R. and Penner, D. 1982. Compatibility of diclofop and BAS 9052 with bentazon. Weed Sci. 30: 458462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. R. and Penner, D. 1985. Sethoxydim metabolism in monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants. Weed Sci. 33: 771773.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. R. and Penner, D. 1987. Retention, absorption, translocation and distribution of sethoxydim in monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants. Weed Res. 27: 179186.Google Scholar
Cantwell, J. R., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Imazethapyr for weed control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 3: 596601.Google Scholar
DeFelice, M. S., Brown, W. B., Aldrich, R. J., Sims, B. D., Judy, D. T., and Guethle, D. R. 1989. Weed control in soybeans (Glycine max) with reduced rates of postemergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 37: 365374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harker, K. N. and O'Sullivan, A. 1991. Synergistic mixtures of sethoxydim and fluazifop on annual grass weeds. Weed Technol. 5.310316.Google Scholar
Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1950. The Water-Culture Method for Growing Plants Without Soil. Davis. CA: California Agricultural Experiment Station Circular No. 347. 32 p.Google Scholar
Hoppe, H. H. 1985. Differential effect of diclofop-methyl on fatty acid biosynthesis in leaves of sensitive and tolerant plant species. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 23: 297308.Google Scholar
Minton, B. W., Kurtz, M. E., and Shaw, D. R. 1989a. Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control with grass and broadleaf weed herbicide combinations. Weed Sci. 37: 223227.Google Scholar
Minton, B. W., Shaw, D. R., and Kurtz, M. E. 1989b. Postemergence grass and broadleaf herbicide interactions for red rice (Oryza sativa) control in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 3: 329334.Google Scholar
Nalewaja, J. D. and Skrzypczak, G. A. 1986. Absorption and translocation of sethoxydim with additives. Weed Sci. 34: 657663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nalewaja, J. D., Skrzypczak, G. A., and Gillespie, G. R. 1986. Absorption and translocation of herbicides with lipid compounds. Weed Sci. 34: 564568.Google Scholar
Newsom, L.J., Shaw, D. R., and Hubbard, T. F. Jr. 1993. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of AC 263,222 in peanut (Arachis hypogaea), soybean (Glycine max), and selected weeds. Weed Sci. 41: 523527.Google Scholar
Rhodes, G. N. and Coble, H. D. 1984. Influence of bentazon on absorption and translocation of sethoxydim in goosegrass (Eleusine indica). Weed Sci. 32: 595597.Google Scholar
Scott, R. C. 1997. SAN 582 synergism with postemergence herbicides. . Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS. 93 p.Google Scholar
Scott, R. C., Shaw, D. R., O'Neal, W. B., and Klingaman, T. D. 1998. Spray adjuvant, formulation, and environmental effects on synergism from post-applied tank mixtures of SAN 582 with fluazifop-P, imazethapyr, and sethoxydim. Weed Technol. In press.Google Scholar
Scott, R. C., Shaw, D. R., Ratliff, R. L., and Soignier, S. S. 1995. Additive effects of SAN 582 tank mixtures with imazethapyr and sethoxydim. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48: 85.Google Scholar
Shaner, D. L. and Mallipudi, N. M. 1991. Chapter 7: mechanisms of selectivity of the imidazolinones. Pages 91102 in Shaner, D. L. and O'Conner, S. L., eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. Boston: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. M. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1992. Ammonium sulfate increases efficacy of sethoxydim through increased absorption and translocation. Weed Sci. 40: 351358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swisher, B. A. and Corbin, F. T. 1982. Behavior of BAS-9052 OH in soybean (Glycine max) and johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) plant and cell cultures. Weed Sci. 30: 640650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanamarta, G., Penner, D., and Kells, J. J. 1989. Identification of efficacious adjuvants for sethoxydim and bentazon. Weed Technol. 3: 6066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, B. G., Hart, S. E., and Wax, L. M. 1996. Interactions of sethoxydim and corn (Zea mays) postemergence broadleaf herbicides on three annual grasses. Weed Technol. 10: 914922.Google Scholar