Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:07:51.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of temperature on susceptibility of sunflower varieties to sunflower broomrape (Orobanche cumana) and Egyptian broomrape (Orobanche aegyptiaca)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Joseph Hershenhorn
Affiliation:
Department of Weed Research, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, The Agricultural Research Organization (ARO), P.O. Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30095, Israel
Dina Plakhine
Affiliation:
Department of Weed Research, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, The Agricultural Research Organization (ARO), P.O. Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30095, Israel
Yeshaiahu Kleifeld
Affiliation:
Department of Weed Research, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, The Agricultural Research Organization (ARO), P.O. Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30095, Israel
Danny Shtienberg
Affiliation:
Department of Phytopathology, The Agricultural Research Organization (ARO), P.O. Box 6, Beit Dagan 50250, Israel
Baruch Rubin
Affiliation:
The Institute of Plant Science and Genetics, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot 76100, Israel

Abstract

Sunflower broomrape and Egyptian broomrape are two holoparasites of sunflower that cause severe yield loss. The aim of the current study was to clarify the relationship between temperature and sunflower broomrape and Egyptian broomrape parasitism of the resistant sunflower variety ‘Ambar’ (R) and the susceptible variety ‘Adi’ (S). Experiments were conducted in pots under controlled conditions in a multiclimate greenhouse at five temperature (day–night) regimes: 17:9 C, 20:12 C, 23:15 C, 26:18 C, and 29:21 C. The resistant confectionery sunflower variety (R) was susceptible to sunflower broomrape only at low temperature regimes of 17:9 C, whereas the S variety was highly susceptible from 29 to 9 C. Temperature correlated negatively with the number of sunflower broomrape and Egyptian broomrape shoots that emerged above the soil in the R variety, and positively in the S variety. The number of degenerated tubercles found on the roots of the resistant variety correlated positively with temperature in both sunflower broomrape and Egyptian broomrape. No such correlation could be found in the susceptible sunflower variety grown in the presence of these two parasites. The resistance response of the R variety to sunflower broomrape and Egyptian broomrape was similar regardless of temperature regime. Parasite seeds were successfully germinated and attached to the sunflower roots but the parasite at the infection site degenerated and died. On the other hand, the susceptible variety (S) was equally susceptible to Egyptian broomrape and sunflower broomrape in all the temperature regimes tested, and susceptibility increased as temperature increased.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Alonso, L. C. 1998. Resistance to Orobanche and resistance breeding: a review. Pages 233257 In Wegmann, K., Musselman, L. J., and Joel, D. M., eds. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Orobanche Research. Albena, Bulgaria: Institute for Wheat and Sunflower Dobroudja.Google Scholar
Antonova, T. S. 1994. Biochemical aspects of the development of new virulent forms in the Moldavian population (race C) of Orobanche cumana Wallr. Against the background of resistant sunflower cultivars. Pages 290292 In Pieterse, A. H., Verkleij, J.A.C., and ter Borg, S. J., eds. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Orobanche and Related Striga Research. Amsterdam: Royal Tropical Institute.Google Scholar
Castejon-Munoz, M., Romero-Munoz, F., and Garcia-Torres, L. 1993. Effect of planting date on broomrape (Orobanche cernua Loefl) infection on sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Weed Res. 33:171176.Google Scholar
Eizenberg, H., Tanaami, Z., Jacobsohn, R., and Rubin, B. 2001. Effect of temperature on the relationship between Orobanche spp. and carrot (Daucus carota L.). Crop Prot. 20:415420.Google Scholar
Eizenberg, H., Tanaami, Z., Ovdat, N., Rubin, B., and Jacobsohn, R. 1998. Effect of seasonal conditions on host-parasite relationship. Pages 187193 In Wegmann, K., Musselman, L. J., and Joel, D. M., eds. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Orobanche Research. Albena, Bulgaria: Institute for Wheat and Sunflower Dobroudja.Google Scholar
Encheva, V. and Shindrova, P. 1994. Broomrape (Orobanche cumana Wallr.)—a hindrance to sunflower production in Bulgaria. Pages 619622 In Pieterse, A. H., Verkleij, J.A.C., and ter Borg, S. J., eds. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Orobanche and Related Striga Research. Amsterdam: Royal Tropical Institute.Google Scholar
Goldwasser, Y., Kleifeld, Y., Plakhine, D., and Rubin, B. 1997. Variations in vetch (Vicia spp.) response to Orobanche aegyptiaca . Weed Sci. 45:756762.Google Scholar
Gordon-Ish-Shalom, N., Jacobsohn, R., and Cohen, Y. 1994. Seasonal fluctuations in sunflower's resistance to Orobanche cumana . Pages 351355 In Pieterse, A. H., Verkleij, J.A.C., and ter Borg, S. J., eds. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Orobanche and Related Striga Research. Amsterdam: Royal Tropical Institute.Google Scholar
Hassan-Ali, A. 1983. Strigol analog: synthetic achievements and prospect. Pages 125132 In Ayensu, E. S., Dogget, H., Keynes, R. D., Marton-Leferve, J., Musselman, L. J., Parker, C., and Pickering, A., eds. Striga Biology and Control. Ottawa: ICSU Press.Google Scholar
Katzir, N., Portnoy, V., Tzuri, G., Castejon-Munoz, M., and Joel, D. M. 1996. Use of random amplified polimorphic DNA (RAPD) markers in study of the parasitic weed Orobanche . Theor. Appl. Genet. 93:367372.Google Scholar
Kleifeld, Y., Goldwasser, Y., Herzlinger, G. et al. 1994. Differential response of pepper varieties to Orobanche spp. as a measure for using peppers as trap crops. Phytoparasitica. 22:144.Google Scholar
Kukula, S. T., Haddad, A., and Masri, H. 1985. Weed control in lentils, faba beans and chickpeas. Pages 169177 In Saxena, M. C. and Varma, S., eds. Faba Beans, Kabuli Chickpeas and Lentils in the 1980's, Proceedings of an International Workshop. Aleppo, Syria: ICARDA.Google Scholar
Linke, K. H., Schnell, H., and Saxena, M. C. 1991. Factors affecting the seed bank of Orobanche crenata in fields under lentil base cropping systems in Northern Syria. Pages 321327 In Ransom, J. K., Musselman, L. J., and Worsham, A. D., eds. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Parasitic Weeds. Nairobi: CIMMYT.Google Scholar
Mesa-Garcia, J. and Garcia Torres, L. 1986. Effect of planting date on parasitism of broad bean (Vicia faba) by crenate broomrape (Orobanche crenata). Weed Sci. 34:544550.Google Scholar
Parker, C. and Riches, C. R. 1993. Orobanche species: the broomrape. Pages 111164 In Parasitic Weeds of the World: Biology and Control. Wallingford, Great Britain: CAB International.Google Scholar
Serghini, K., de Luque, A. P., Munoz, M. C., Torres, L. G., and Jorrin, J. V. 2001. Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) response to broomrape (Orobanche cernua Loefi.) parasitism: induced synthesis and excretion of 7-hydroxylated simple coumarins. J. Exp. Bot. 52:22272234.Google Scholar
Sukno, S. and Fernandez, J. M. 2001. Temperature effect on the disease reactions of sunflower to the infection by Orobanche cumana . Plant Dis. 85:553556.Google Scholar
van Hezewijk, M. J., Pieterse, A. H., Sexena, M. C., and ter Borg, S. J. 1987. Relationship between sowing date and the development of Orobanche crenata on faba bean and lentil in Syria. Pages 377390 In Weber, H. C. and Forstreuter, W., eds. Parasitic Flowering Plants. Marburg, Germany: Philipps Universitat.Google Scholar