Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T01:20:35.072Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of tillage on microbial characteristics and herbicide degradation in a Sharkey clay soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Simone Seifert ,
David R. Shaw ,
Robert M. Zablotowicz ,
Richard A. Wesley  and
William L. Kingery
Simone Seifert
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762
Robert M. Zablotowicz
Affiliation:
USDA/ARS, Southern Weed Science Research Unit, Stoneville, MS 38776
Richard A. Wesley
Affiliation:
USDA/ARS, Application and Production Technology Research, Stoneville, MS 38776
William L. Kingery
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field and laboratory studies were conducted at Stoneville, MS, from 1996 to 1998 to determine the influence of subsoiling (SS) and conventional tillage (CT) of a Sharkey clay soil on microbial characteristics and herbicide degradation. Soil samples obtained from imazaquin-treated and nontreated plots from the soybean row and interrow position were analyzed. Because only the row position is actually disturbed by SS, a comparison of row and interrow position on the parameter was conducted. Imazaquin (preemergence, 140 g ai ha−1) had no effect on microbial populations, microbial enzyme activity (fluorescein diacetate [FDA] hydrolysis and triphenyl-tetrazolium chloride [TTC] dehydrogenase), and organic carbon content. Estimates of microbial activity based on FDA hydrolysis and TTC dehydrogenase activity indicated greater activity under CT; however, microbial biomass and organic carbon were not affected by tillage or row position. A laboratory study assessed the degradation of carboxyl- and ring-labeled 2,4-D as influenced by tillage and row position. Soils from CT plots had an initially higher mineralization rate of 14C carboxyl-labeled 2,4-D compared to soils from SS plots; however, no effect of tillage or row position was observed on the cumulative amount of 14CO2 evolved 14 d after treatment (DAT) in 1996 and 18 DAT in 1998. In studies with ring-labeled 2,4-D, a higher 14CO2 evolution was detected in soils obtained from SS plots, regardless of row position, whereas a greater amount of radioactivity was observed in the unextractable fraction from CT soils. Because differences in 2,4-D mineralization between tillage regimes were minimal, adoption of SS as a tillage practice for heavy clay soils in the Mississippi Delta may have a limited effect on microbial characteristics and biodegradation of soil-applied herbicides.

Keywords

2,4-D2,4-DCP, 2,4-dichlorophenolimazaquinFDA, fluorescein diacetateTTC, triphenyl-tetrazolium chloridesoybean, Glycine max (L.) MerrEnzymatic activitymicrobial metabolismsubsoiling
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 49 , Issue 5 , October 2001 , pp. 685 - 693
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, J.P.E. 1981. Soil moisture and the rates of biodegradation of diallate and triallate. Soil Biol. Biochem. 13:155–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J.P.E. 1984. Herbicide degradation in soil: influence of microbial biomass. Soil Biol. Biochem. 16:483–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartha, R. and Pramer, D. 1965. Features of a flask and method for measuring the persistence and biological effects of pesticides in soil. Soil Sci. 100:68–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biederbeck, V. O., Campbell, C. A., and Smith, A. E. 1987. Effects of long-term 2,4-D field applications on soil biochemical processes. J. Environ. Qual. 16:257–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollag, J. M. and Liu, S. Y. 1990. Biological transformation processes of pesticides. Pages 169–211 In Pesticides in the Soil Environment. Book Series No. 2. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Casida, L. E. Jr. 1977. Microbial metabolic activity in soil as measured by dehydrogenase determinations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 34:630–636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dick, R. P. 1994. Soil enzyme activities as indicator of soil quality. Pages 107–124 In Doran, J. W., Coleman, D. C., Bezdicek, D. F., and Stewart, B. A., eds. Defining Soil Quality of a Sustainable Environment. Special Publ. No. 35. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Dick, W. A. 1984. Influence of long-term tillage and crop rotation combinations on soil enzyme activities. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 48:569–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doran, J. W. 1980. Soil microbial and biochemical changes associated with reduced tillage. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44:765–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eghball, B., Mielke, L. N., McCallister, D. L., and Doran, J. W. 1994. Distribution of organic carbon and inorganic nitrogen in a soil under various tillage and crop sequences. J. Soil Water Conserv. 49:201–205.Google Scholar
Foster, R. K. and McKercher, R. B. 1973. Laboratory incubation studies of chlorophenoxyacetic acids in chernozemic soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 5:333–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, W. D., Hagedorn, C., Bardinelli, T. R., and Zablotowicz, R. M. 1985. New selective media for enumeration and recovery of fluorescent pseudomonads from various habitats. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 49:28–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greer, L. E. and Shelton, D. R. 1992. Effect of inoculant strain and organic matter content on kinetics of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid degradation in soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58:1459–1465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffith, D. R., Moncrief, J. F., Eckert, D. J., Swan, J. B., and Breitbach, D. D. 1992. Crop response to tillage systems. Pages 25–33 In Conservation Tillage Systems and Management. Ames, IA: Iowa State University.Google Scholar
Jenkinson, D. S. and Ladd, J. N. 1981. Microbial biomass in soil: measurement and turnover. Pages 415–472 In Paul, E. A. and Ladd, J. N., eds., Soil Biochemistry. Volume 5. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Jenkinson, D. S. and Powlson, D. S. 1976. The effect of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil. V. A method of measuring soil biomass. Soil Biol. Biochem. 8:209–213.Google Scholar
Kaiser, E. A. and Heinemeyer, O. 1993. Seasonal variations in soil microbial biomass carbon within the plough layer. Soil Biol. Biochem. 25:1649–1655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchner, M. J., Wollum, A. G. II, and King, L. D. 1993. Soil microbial populations and activities in reduced chemical input agroecosystems. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57:1289–1295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunc, F. and Rybarova, J. 1983. Mineralization of carbon atoms of 14C-2.4-D side chain and degradation ability of bacteria in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 15:141–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levanon, D., Meisinger, J. J., Codling, E. E., and Starr, J. L. 1994. Impact of tillage on microbial activity and the fate of pesticides in the upper soil. Water Air Soil Pollut. 72:179–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, M. A. and Bryson, C. T. 1997. Herbicide-soil interactions in reduced tillage and plant residue management systems. Weed Sci. 45:307–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. P. 1950. Use of acid, Rose Bengal and streptomycin in the plate method for estimation of soil fungi. Soil Sci. 69:215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorman, T. B. and Dowler, C. C. 1991. Herbicide and rotation effects on soil and rhizosphere microorganisms and crop yields. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 35:311–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narain Rai, J. P. 1992. Effects of long-term 2,4-D application on microbial populations and biochemical processes in cultivated soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils 13:187–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, D. W. and Sommers, L. E. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Pages 539–579 In Page, A. L., Miller, R. H., and Keeney, D. R., eds. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Agronomy Monograph No. 9. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy—Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Reddy, K. N., Zablotowicz, R. M., and Locke, M. A. 1995. Chlorimuron adsorption, desorption, and degradation in soils from conventional tillage and no-tillage systems. J. Environ. Qual. 24:760–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkar, J. M., Malcolm, R. L., and Bollag, J. 1988. Enzymatic coupling of 2.4-dichlorophenol to stream fulvic acid in the presence of oxidoreductases. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 52:688–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnürer, J. and Rosswall, T. 1982. Fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis as a measure of total microbial activity in soil and litter. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 43:1256–1261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seifert, S. 1999. Environmental Fate of Imazaquin in a Sharkey Clay Soil: Effect of Soil Management Systems. . Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS. 85 p.Google Scholar
Sinsabaugh, R. I. 1994. Enzymatic analysis of microbial pattern and process. Biol. Fertil. Soils 17:69–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. E. 1985. Identification of 2,4-dichloroanisole and 2,4-dichloro-phenol as soil degradation products of ring-labeled [14C] 2,4-D. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 34:150–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stott, D. E., Martin, J. P., Focht, D. D., and Haider, K. 1983. Biodegradation, stabilization in humus, and incorporation into soil biomass of 2,4-D and chlorocatechol carbons. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 47:66–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, S. C., Zablotowicz, R. M., Gaston, L. A., and Locke, M. A. 1996. Bentazon degradation in soil: influence of tillage and history of bentazon application. J. Agric. Food Chem. 44:1593–1598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, S. C., Zablotowicz, R. M., Locke, M. A., Smeda, R. J., and Bryson, C. T. 1995. Influence of herbicide-desiccated cover crops on biological soil quality in the Mississippi Delta. Pages 86–89 In Kingery, W. L. and Buehring, N., eds. Conservation Farming: A Focus on Water Quality. MAFES Special Bulletin 88-7. Mississippi State, MS: Mississippi State University.Google Scholar
Wesley, R. A. and Smith, L. A. 1991. Response of soybean to deep tillage with controlled traffic on clay soil. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 34:113–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesley, R. A., Smith, L. A., and Spurlock, S. R. 1994. Fall Deep Tillage of Clay: Agronomic and Economic Benefits to Soybeans. Mississippi State, MS: Mississippi State University, Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station Bulletin 1015.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. G. Jr., and Cheng, H. H. 1978. Fate of 2,4-D in a Naff silt loam soil. J. Environ. Qual. 7:281–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zablotowicz, R. M., Hoagland, R. E., and Locke, M. A. 1994. Glutathione S-transferase activity in rhizosphere bacteria and the potential for herbicide detoxification. Pages 184–198 In Anderson, T. A. and Coats, J. R., eds. Bioremediation through Rhizosphere Technology. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society Symposium Series No. 563.Google Scholar
Zablotowicz, R. M., Hoagland, R. E., Staddon, W. J., and Locke, M. A. 2000. Effects of pH on chemical stability and de-esterification of fenoxaprop-ethyl by purified enzymes, bacterial extracts, and soils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 48:4711–4716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zablotowicz, R. M., Locke, M. A., and Smeda, R. J. 1998. Degradation of 2,4-D and fluometuron in cover crop residues. Chemosphere 37:87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar