Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T03:29:56.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic Variation in Invasive Populations of Yellow Toadflax (Linaria vulgaris) in the Western United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Sarah M. Ward ,
Scott D. Reid ,
Judy Harrington ,
Jason Sutton  and
K George Beck
Sarah M. Ward*
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
Scott D. Reid
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
Judy Harrington
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
Jason Sutton
Affiliation:
Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
K George Beck
Affiliation:
Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: sarah.ward@colostate.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Intraspecific genetic variation may contribute significantly to invasiveness and control problems, but has been characterized to date in relatively few invasive weed species. We examined 56 intersimple sequence repeat (ISSR) loci in 220 individuals from 11 invading populations of yellow toadflax sampled across five western states. All populations showed high levels of genetic diversity. Estimated values for Shannon's diversity measure ranged from 0.217 to 0.388, and for expected heterozygosity from 0.178 to 0.260. Nei's total gene diversity index (HT), on the basis of all individuals across all populations, was 0.267. Partitioning of genetic variance using analysis of molecular variance revealed 1.7% of genetic variation among regional population groups, 29.1% among populations within groups, and 69.2% within populations, consistent with expectations for an outcrossing species but suggesting little geographic differentiation. Pairs of adjacent individuals identical at all ISSR loci that appeared to be ramets of a single clone were detected in only one population. This indicates that patch expansion in yellow toadflax is driven more by sexual reproduction via seed than by rhizomatous clonal spread, at least at the spatial scale of sampling for this study. Eight populations had significant values for Mantel's R at P = 0.05, suggesting some fine-scale positive genetic structuring, possibly from restricted gene flow. Population clustering on the basis of Nei's genetic distance between populations and unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean did not reflect geographic location. It is likely that multiple introductions of this species have occurred across the Intermountain West, followed by extensive genetic recombination. High levels of genetic diversity within yellow toadflax populations pose management challenges, as already seen in reports of variable response to herbicide application and limited impacts of biocontrol agent releases.

Keywords

Yellow toadflax, Linaria vulgaris Miller.Genetic diversityintersimple sequence repeatsISSRinvasive plant
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , June 2008 , pp. 394 - 399
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Arnold, R. M. 1982. Pollination, predation and seed set in Linaria vulgaris (Scrophulariaceae). Am. Midl. Nat. 107:360–369.Google Scholar
Barrett, S. C. H. and Kohn, J. R. 1991. Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants: Implications for conservation. Pages 3–30 in Falk, D. A. and Holsinger, K. E. Genetics and Conservation of Rare Plants. New York Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bassam, B. J. and Caetano-Anolles, G. 1993. Silver staining of DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Appl. Biochem. and Biotech. 42:181–188.Google Scholar
Clapham, A. R., Tutin, T. G., and Warburg, E. F. 1957. Flora of the British Isles. Cambridge, U.K. Cambridge University Press. 1591.Google Scholar
Dice, L. R. 1945. Measures of the amount of ecological association between species. Ecology. 26:297–302.Google Scholar
Docherty, Z. 1982. Self-incompatibility in Linaria . Heredity. 49:349–352.Google Scholar
Doyle, J. J. and Doyle, J. L. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19:11–15.Google Scholar
Durka, W., Bossdorf, O., Prati, D., and Auge, H. 2005. Molecular evidence for multiple introductions of garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata, Brassicaceae) to North America. Mol. Ecol. 14:1697–1706.Google Scholar
Ellstrand, N. C. and Schierenbeck, K. A. 2000. Hybridization as stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 97:7043–7050.Google Scholar
Fernald, M. L. 1905. Some recently introduced weeds. Trans. Mass. Hort. Soc. Part. 1:11–22.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford, UK Clarendon Press. 291.Google Scholar
Frankham, R. 2005. Resolving the genetic paradox in invasive species. Heredity. 94:385.Google Scholar
Genton, B. J., Shykoff, J. A., and Giraud, T. 2005. High genetic diversity in French invasive populations of common ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia, as a result of multiple sources of introduction. Mol. Ecol. 14:4275–4285.Google Scholar
Gupta, M., Chyi, Y-S., Romero-Severson, J., and Owen, J. L. 1994. Amplification of DNA markers from evolutionarily diverse genomes using single primers of simple-sequence repeats. Theor. Appl. Genet. 89:998–1006.Google Scholar
Hamrick, J. L. and Godt, M. J. 1989. Allozyme diversity in plant species. Pages 43–63. in Brown, A. H. D., Clegg, M. T., Kahler, A. L., and Weir, B. S. Plant Population Genetics, Breeding, and Genetic Resources. Sunderland, MA Sinauer.Google Scholar
Hamrick, J. L. and Godt, M. J. 1996. Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 351:1291–1298.Google Scholar
Hettwer, U. and Gerowitt, B. 2004. An investigation of genetic variation in Cirsium arvense field patches. Weed Res. 44:289–297.Google Scholar
Hollingsworth, M. L. and Bailey, J. P. 2000. Evidence for massive clonal growth in the invasive weed Fallopia japonica (Japanese knotweed). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 133:463–472.Google Scholar
Hulten, E. and Fries, M. 1986. Atlas of the North European vascular plants. Volume III. Koenigsteín, Germany Koeltz. 197.Google Scholar
Lajeunesse, S. E. 1999. Dalmatian and yellow toadflax. Pages 202–216. in Sheley, R. L. and Petroff, J. K. Biology and Management of Noxious Rangeland Weeds. Corvallis, OR Oregon State University Press. 438.Google Scholar
Lee, C. E. 2002. Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends in Ecol. and Evol. 17:386–391.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. and Milligan, B. G. 1994. Analysis of population structure with RAPD markers. Mol. Ecol. 3:91–99.Google Scholar
Mengistu, L. W. and Messersmith, C. G. 2002. Genetic diversity of kochia. Weed Sci. 50:498–350.Google Scholar
Nadeau, L. and King, J. R. 1991. Seed dispersal and seedling establishment of Linaria vulgaris Mill. Can. J. Plant Sci. 71:771–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nei, M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat. 106:283–292.Google Scholar
Nei, M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics. 89:583–590.Google Scholar
Pappert, R. A., Hamrick, J. L., and Donovan, L. A. 2000. Genetic variation in Pueraria lobata (Fabaceae), an introduced, clonal, invasive plant of the southeastern United States. Am. J. Bot. 87:1240–1245.Google Scholar
Parker, R. and Peabody, D. 1983. Yellow toadflax and Dalmatian toadflax. Pacific Northwest Coop. Ext. Bull. 135. Pullman, WA Washington State University.Google Scholar
Peakall, R. and Smouse, P. 2005. GenAlEx 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Notes. 6:288–295.Google Scholar
Poulin, J., Weller, S. G., and Sakai, A. K. 2005. Genetic diversity does not affect the invasiveness of fountain grass (Pennisetum setaceum) in Arizona, California and Hawaii. Divers. Distrib. 11:241–247.Google Scholar
Ren, M. X., Zhang, Q. G., and Zhang, D. Y. 2005. Random amplified polymorphic DNA markers reveal low genetic variation and a single dominant genotype in Eichornia crassipes populations throughout China. Weed Res. 45:236–244.Google Scholar
Sakai, A. K., Allendorf, F. W., Holt, J. S., et al. 2001. The population biology of invasive species. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32:305–332.Google Scholar
Sebastian, J. R. and Beck, K. G. 1998. Yellow toadflax control with metsulfuron, metsulfuron tank mixes, picloram, quinclorac, 2,4-D, or dicamba. Res. Prog. Rep. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 24.Google Scholar
Sebastian, J. R. and Beck, K. G. 1999. The influence of picloram or picloram plus 2,4-D applied for 1, 2 or 3 years on cover, density and control of yellow toadflax on Colorado rangeland. Res. Prog. Rep. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 36–37.Google Scholar
Shannon, C. E. and Weaver, W. 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, IL University of Illinois Press. 125.Google Scholar
Sun, J. H., Li, Z-C., Jewett, D. K., Britton, K. O., Ye, W. H., and Ge, X-J. 2005. Genetic diversity of Pueraria lobata (kudzu) and closely related taxa as revealed by inter-simple sequence repeat analysis. Weed Res. 45:255–260.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. R., Stohlgren, T. J., and Beck, K. G. 2007. Predicting yellow toadflax infestations in the Flat Tops Wilderness of Colorado. Biol. Invasions. 9:783–793.Google Scholar
Thompson, S. K. 2002. Sampling. 2nd ed. New York Wiley. 367.Google Scholar
Ward, S. M. 2006. Molecular marker and DNA sequencing methods. Pages 347–369. in Motley, T. J. and Cross, H. Darwin's Harvest. New York Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, L. M., Sing, S. E., Piper, G. L., Hansen, R. W., De Clerck-Floate, R., MacKinnon, D. K., and Randall, C. 2005. Biology and Biological Control of Dalmatian and Yellow Toadflax. USDA Forest Service, FHTET-05-13.Google Scholar
Zhivotovsky, L. A. 1999. Estimating population structure in diploids with multilocus dominant DNA markers. Mol. Ecol. 8:907–913.Google Scholar