Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T11:09:25.558Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Herbicidal Potential of Rhizobitoxine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Lowell D. Owens*
Affiliation:
Soil Microbiol., U. S. Soils Lab., Soil and Water Conservation Res. Div., Agr. Res. Serv., U. S. Dep. of Agr., Beltsville, Maryland

Abstract

The bacterially produced phytotoxin 2-amino-4-(2-amino-3-hydroxypropoxy)-trans-3-butenoic acid (rhizobitoxine) was tested for herbicidal properties in comparison with 3-amino-s-triazole (amitrole) and 4-chloro-5-(dimethylamino)-2-(a,a,a,-trifluro-m-tolyl)-3(2H)-pyridazinone (metflurazone). In postemergence tests with various plant seedlings, rhizobitoxine and amitrole were approximately equal in phytotoxicity on a weight basis, and both were generally much more phytotoxic than metflurazone. Phytotoxicity of rhizobitoxine varied markedly among grass species. Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ‘Hegari’) was very sensitive to rhizobitoxine, large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.) was moderately sensitive, wheat (Triticum aestivum L. ‘Thorne’) was tolerant, and Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) was very tolerant. In contrast, amitrole was almost as phytotoxic to bluegrass as to large crabgrass, and metflurazone had little effect on either. In a preemergence test with mustard (Brassica japonica (L.) Coss. ‘Southern Giant Curled’) rhizobitoxine was as effective as amitrole, when compared on a molar basis, in inhibiting chlorophyll synthesis and root growth and was superior in retarding overall growth and development.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Arnon, D. I. 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris . Plant Physiol. 24:115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Giovanelli, J., Owens, L. D. and Mudd, S. H. 1970. Mechanism of inhibition of spinach β-cystathionase by rhizobitoxine. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 227:671684.Google Scholar
3. Hilton, J. L., Scharen, A. L., St. John, J. B., Moreland, D. E., and Norris, K. H. 1969. Modes of action of pyridazinone herbicides. Weed Sci. 17:541547.Google Scholar
4. Johnson, H. W., Means, U. M. and Clark, F. E. 1959. Responses of seedlings to extracts of soybean nodules bearing selected strains of Rhizobium japonicum . Nature 183:308309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Owens, L. D., Lieberman, M. and Kunishi, A. 1971. Inhibition of ethylene production by rhizobitoxine. Plant Physiol. 48:14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Owens, L. D., Thompson, J. F., Pitcher, R. G. and Williams, T. 1972. Structure of rhizobitoxine, a toxic enol-ether amino acid from Rhizobium japonicum . J. Chem. Soc. D. Chem. Commun., p. 714.Google Scholar
7. Owens, L. D. and Wright, D. A. 1965. Rhizobial-induced chlorosis in soybean: Isolation, production in nodules, and varietal specificity of the toxin. Plant Physiol. 40:927930.Google Scholar