Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T12:11:29.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Damage Niche in Illinois Soybean Is Seed Limited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Adam S. Davis ,
Brian J. Schutte ,
Aaron G. Hager  and
Bryan G. Young
Adam S. Davis*
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service, Urbana, IL 61801
Brian J. Schutte
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Pathology and Weed Science, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003
Aaron G. Hager
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Bryan G. Young
Affiliation:
Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: asdavis1@illinois.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Palmer amaranth, a dioecious summer annual forb, originating in Sonoran desert washes, compromises crop yields in much of the southern United States and its range is expanding northward. Appropriate tactics for managing this weed proactively in the Upper Midwest will depend on characterizing its damage niche, the geographic range in which it can reduce crop yields. We implemented a common garden study in 2011 and 2012, planting eight accessions of Palmer amaranth from the southern and midwestern United States, into soybean crops in southern, central, and northern Illinois, at a population density of 8 plants m−2 with a biocontainment protocol. Once Palmer amaranth plants initiated flowering, they were removed and burned. Weed survival, flowering, and weed biomass were measured, in addition to soybean yield and weather data. Analyses indicated that Palmer amaranth's damage niche in Illinois soybean was independent of weed genotype or maternal environment. Despite competing only briefly, Palmer amaranth reduced soybean yields in all site–years, indicating its damage niche in Illinois, and much of the Midwest, is limited primarily by seed immigration rate. These results highlight the urgent need for weed managers to learn Palmer amaranth identification, prevent seed introduction, and maintain a policy of zero seed return.

Keywords

Palmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.Common garden experimentgenetic and environmental variationgeographic range expansionglobal changeweed–crop interference
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 63 , Issue 3 , September 2015 , pp. 658 - 668
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America

Footnotes

Current address: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907.

References

Literature Cited

Andersen, RN, Menges, RM, Conn, JS (1985) Variability in velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and reproduction beyond its current range in North America. Weed Sci. 33:507–512 Google Scholar
Bell, MS, Hager, AG, Tranel, PJ (2013) Multiple resistance to herbicides from four site-of-action groups in waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus). Weed Sci. 61:460–468 Google Scholar
Bensch, CN, Horak, MJ, Peterson, D (2003) Interference of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus), Palmer amaranth (A. palmeri), and common waterhemp (A. rudis) in soybean. Weed Sci. 51:37–43 Google Scholar
Burke, IC, Schroeder, M, Thomas, WE, Wilcut, JW (2007) Palmer amaranth interference and seed production in peanut. Weed Technol. 21:367–371 Google Scholar
Burnham, KP, Anderson, DR (2002) Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. 2nd edn. New York Springer Verlag. 488 pGoogle Scholar
Colautti, RI, Grigorovich, IA, MacIsaac, HJ (2006) Propagule pressure: a null model for biological invasions. Biol Invasions. 8:1023–1037 Google Scholar
Crawley, MJ (2007) The R Book. West Sussex, England Wiley. 942 pGoogle Scholar
Giacomini, D, Westra, P, Ward, SM (2014) Impact of genetic background in fitness cost studies: an example from glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth. Weed Sci. 62:29–37 Google Scholar
Grace, JB (2006) Structural Equation Modeling and Natural Systems. Cambridge Cambridge University Press. 365 pGoogle Scholar
Guo, P, Al-Khatib, K (2003) Temperature effects on germination and growth of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus), Palmer amaranth (A. palmeri), and common waterhemp (A. rudis). Weed Sci. 51:869–875 Google Scholar
Hager, AG (2014) U of I shares tips for managing Palmer amaranth. Prairie Farmer. http://magissues.farmprogress.com/PRA/PF05May14/pra026.pdf. Accessed October 31, 2014Google Scholar
Humston, R, Mortensen, DA, Bjornstad, ON (2005) Anthropogenic forcing on the spatial dynamics of an agricultural weed: the case of the common sunflower. J Appl Ecol. 42:863–872 Google Scholar
Jha, P, Norsworthy, JK, Riley, MB, Bridges, W (2010) Annual changes in temperature and light requirements for germination of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) seeds retrieved from soil. Weed Sci. 58:426–432 Google Scholar
Jordan, N (1996) Weed prevention: priority research for alternative weed management. J Prod Agric. 9:485–490 Google Scholar
Klingaman, TE, Oliver, LR (1994) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 42:523–527 Google Scholar
Lindquist, JL, Mortensen, DA, Clay, SA, Schmenck, R, Kells, JJ, Howatt, K, Westra, P (1996) Stability of corn (Zea mays)-velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) interference relationships. Weed Sci. 44:309–313 Google Scholar
Lindquist, JL, Mortensen, DA, Westra, P, Lambert, WJ, Bauman, TT, Fausey, JC, Kells, JJ, Langton, SJ, Harvey, RG, Bussler, BH, Banken, K, Clay, S, Forcella, F (1999) Stability of corn (Zea mays)–foxtail (Setaria spp.) interference relationships. Weed Sci. 47:195–200 Google Scholar
McDonald, A, Riha, S, DiTommaso, A, DeGaetano, A (2009) Climate change and the geography of weed damage: analysis of US maize systems suggests the potential for significant range transformations. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 130:131–140 Google Scholar
Mishra, V, Cherkauer, KA (2010) Retrospective droughts in the crop growing season: implications to corn and soybean yield in the midwestern United States. Agric For Meteorol. 150:1030–1045 Google Scholar
Moloney, KA, Holzapfel, C, Tielbörger, K, Jeltsch, F, Schurr, FM (2009) Rethinking the common garden in invasion research. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 11:311–320 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Griffith, G, Griffin, T, Bagavathiannan, M, Gbur, EE (2014) In-field movement of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and its impact on cotton lint yield: evidence supporting a zero-threshold strategy. Weed Sci. 62:237–249 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Scott, RC, Smith, KL, Oliver, LR (2008) Response of northeastern Arkansas Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) accessions to glyphosate. Weed Technol. 22:408–413 Google Scholar
Pattison, RR, Mack, RN (2008) Potential distribution of the invasive tree Triadica sebifera (Euphorbiaceae) in the United States: evaluating CLIMEX predictions with field trials. Glob Chang Biol. 14:813–826 Google Scholar
Peterson, DE (1999) The impact of herbicide-resistant weeds on Kansas agriculture. Weed Technol. 13:632–635 Google Scholar
Pinto, SM, MacDougall, AS (2010) Dispersal limitation and environmental structure interact to restrict the occupation of optimal habitat. Am Nat. 175:675–686 Google Scholar
Sauer, J (1957) Recent migration and evolution of the dioecious Amaranths. Evolution. 11:11–31 Google Scholar
Sosnoskie, LM, Culpepper, AS (2014) Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) increases herbicide use, tillage, and hand-weeding in Georgia cotton. Weed Sci. 62:393–402 Google Scholar
Sprague, CL (2014) Palmer Amaranth: Managing This New Weed Problem. http://www.progressiveforage.com/forage-production/management/palmer-amaranth-managing-this-new-weed-problem. Accessed November 4, 2014Google Scholar
Walsh, M, Newman, P, Powles, S (2013) Targeting weed seeds in-crop: a new weed control paradigm for global agriculture. Weed Technol. 27:431–436 Google Scholar
Ward, SM, Webster, TM, Steckel, LE (2013) Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri): a review. Weed Technol. 27:12–27 Google Scholar
Wax, L (1995) Pigweeds of the Midwest—distribution, importance and management. Pp 239–242 in Proceedings of Integrated Crop Management: The road to profit. Stoneleigh Park, U.K. Royal Agricultural Society of England Google Scholar
Wines, M (2014) Invader battles rural America, shrugging off herbicides. New York Times. August 12, 2014, p A11 Google Scholar
Woolcock, JL, Cousens, R (2000) A mathematical analysis of factors affecting the fate of spread of patches of annual weeds in an arable field. Weed Sci. 48:27–34 Google Scholar
Wortman, SE, Davis, AS, Schutte, BJ, Lindquist, JL, Cardina, J, Felix, J, Sprague, CL, Dille, JA, Ramirez, AHM, Reicks, G, Clay, SA (2012) Local conditions, not spatial gradients, drive demographic variation of Ambrosia trifida and Helianthus annuus across northern US maize belt. Weed Sci. 60:440–450 Google Scholar
Yates, D (2014) Palmer Amaranth Threatens Midwest Farm Economy, Researchers Report. Illinois News Bureau. http://news.illinois.edu/news/14/0603palmer_amaranth_AaronHager.html. Accessed October 31, 2014Google Scholar