Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T14:39:57.082Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Performance of BAS 9052 Applied to Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) and Soybeans (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

E. James Retzinger Jr. ,
R. Larry Rogers  and
Ronald P. Mowers
E. James Retzinger Jr.
Affiliation:
N.E. Res. Stn., P.O. Box 438, St. Joseph, LA 71366
R. Larry Rogers
Affiliation:
N.E. Res. Stn., P.O. Box 438, St. Joseph, LA 71366
Ronald P. Mowers
Affiliation:
Exp. Stn., Dep., LSU, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The performance of BAS 9052 {2-[1-(ethoxyimino)-butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)-propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-one} was evaluated when applied postemergence to rhizome and seedling johnsongrass [Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. # SORHA] in soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Bragg’ and ‘Centennial’] when the soybeans had four or five trifoliate leaves (V3 to V4 stages) or when they had six to eight trifoliate leaves (V5 to V7 growth stages). The degree of weed control was more strongly associated with rainfall conditions than with the size of the johnsongrass. An exponential equation was used to describe the relationship of soybean seed yield to BAS 9052 rate. BAS 9052 applications of 0.28 kg ai/ha provided an estimated 98% of the potential soybean yield increase when rainfall was adequate but, 0.41 kg ai/ha was required when the plants were grown under moisture stress. Soybean yields were increased by 260 kg/ha when BAS 9052 was applied at the V3 to V4 compared to the V5 to V7 growth stage.

Keywords

Stage of applicationenvironmental influenceSORHA
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 31 , Issue 6 , November 1983 , pp. 796 - 800
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Allen, D. M. and Cady, F. B. 1982. Analyzing experimental data by regression. Lifetime Learning Publications, Belmont, CA. pp. 295–299.Google Scholar
2. Banks, P. A. 1981. Postemergence johnsongrass control in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 34:48.Google Scholar
3. Dortenzio, W. A. and Norris, R. F. 1980. The influence of soil moisture on the foliar activity of diclofop. Weed Sci. 28:534–539.Google Scholar
4. Fehr, W. R., Caviness, C. E., Burmood, D. T., and Pennington, J. S. 1971. Stage of Development Descriptions of Soybeans, [Glycine max (L.) Merr. J. Crop. Sci. 11:929–931.Google Scholar
5. McCormick, L. L. 1977. Category I —Weed Survey —Southern States Res. Rep. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 30:184–215.Google Scholar
6. McWhorter, C. G. 1979. The effect of surfactant and environment on the toxicity of metriflufen to soybeans (Glycine max) and johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Sci. 27:675–679.Google Scholar
7. McWhorter, C. G. and Hartwig, E. E. 1972. Competition of johnsongrass and cocklebur with six soybean varieties. Weed Sci. 20:56–59.Google Scholar
8. Reynolds, D. B., Oliver, L. R., and Crowley, R. H. 1982. Johnsongrass interference with soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 35:312.Google Scholar
9. Rosser, S. W. and Witt, W. W. 1981. Activity of BAS-9052, CGA-82725 and RO-13-8895 on johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense L.) giant foxtail (Setaria faberi Hermm.). Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 34:99.Google Scholar
10. Shrader, W. D., Fuller, W. A., and Cady, F. B. 1966. Estimates of a common nitrogen response function for corn (Zea mays) in different crop rotations. Agron. J. 58:397–401.Google Scholar