Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T17:42:28.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response of Dwarf Wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Four Weed Species to Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

O. P. Kataria
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Haryana Agric. Univ., Hissar, 125004, India
Vijay Kumar
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Haryana Agric. Univ., Hissar, 125004, India

Abstract

Control of littleseed canarygrass (Phalaris minor Retz.), wild oat (Avena fatua L.), common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.), and field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis L.) in dwarf wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) fields was studied with five herbicides and hand weeding. Terbutryn [2-(tert-butylamino)-4-(ethylamino)-6-(methylthio)-s-triazine] and 1-benzthiazol-2-yl-1,3-dimethylurea controlled the weeds more effectively than did two hand weedings. Diuron [3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea], nitrofen (2,4-dichlorophenyl p-nitrophenyl ether), and dichlormate (3,4-dichlorobenzyl methylcarbamate), proved only partially effective against weeds, and were therefore significantly inferior to two hand weedings. Spikes per meter of row length and test weight of wheat were increased significantly by 1-benzthiazol-2-yl-1,3-dimethylurea (1.5 to 2 kg/ha), terbutryn (0.5 kg/ha), and two hand weedings over the yields of the weedy check. The 1-benzthiazol-2-yl-1,3-dimethylurea showed a high degree of selectivity in the wheat crop at 2 kg/ha and increased yields to those of weed-free plots. Terbutryn was almost as effective as 1-benzthiazol-2-yl-1,3-dimethylurea, which increased the wheat yields over those of the weedy check by 19.8 and 42.4% during the 1974/75 and 1975/76 seasons, respectively. Tolerance of dwarf wheat to terbutryn at 0.75 kg/ha was variable, resulting in significant decreases in yield components and grain yield. Dry-matter yield of wheat was negatively correlated with the dry matter production of weeds.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Eshel, Y. 1972. Selective action of triazines for wild canary grass in wheat. Weed Res. 12:301309.Google Scholar
2. Gautam, K. C. and Mani, V. S. 1975. Chemical weed control in dwarf wheat with particular reference to grass weeds. Indian J. Agron. 20:6567.Google Scholar
3. Gill, H. S. and Brar, L. S. 1977. Chemical control of Phalaris minor and Avena ludoviciana in wheat. PANS. 23:293296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Hill, J. E., Isom, W. H., and Cudney, D. W. 1977. Grass control in wheat and barley. Proc. Annu. Calif. Weed Conf. 29:6675.Google Scholar
5. Hooda, I. S., Kumar, V., and Moolani, M. K. 1974. Control of grassy weeds in dwarf wheat. Indian J. Weed Sci. 6:8387.Google Scholar
6. Kumar, V. and Kataria, O. P. 1977. Studies on germination and growth of Phalaris minor seeded at different depths. Proc. Asian Pac. Weed Sci. Soc. Conf. 6:155159.Google Scholar
7. Kumar, V., Moolani, M. K., and Dhindsa, K. S. 1975. Weed control in wheat – A review. Indian J. Weed Sci. 7:5460.Google Scholar
8. Saghir, A. R. 1977. Weed control in wheat and barley in the Middle East. PANS. 23:282285.Google Scholar
9. Tobalsky, I., Sive, R., and Benyamiri, I. 1972. Methabenzthiazuron – A new herbicide for the control of Phalaris paradoxa and other weeds in winter wheat. Proc. Israeli Weed Control Conf. 4:5657.Google Scholar