Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T10:40:55.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soil water dynamics differ among rangeland plant communities dominated by yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis), annual grasses, or perennial grasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Stephen F. Enloe ,
Joseph M. DiTomaso ,
Steve B. Orloff  and
Daniel J. Drake
Joseph M. DiTomaso
Affiliation:
Department of Vegetable Crops, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
Steve B. Orloff
Affiliation:
University of California Cooperative Extension, Yreka, CA 96097
Daniel J. Drake
Affiliation:
University of California Cooperative Extension, Yreka, CA 96097
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

California's interior grasslands have undergone dramatic changes during the last two centuries. Changes in land-use patterns and plant introductions after European contact and settlement resulted in the conversion of perennial-dominated grasslands to exotic annual grasses. More recently, the annual grasslands have been heavily invaded by the deeply rooted late-maturing forb yellow starthistle. This series of invasions and conversions has changed the community structure and phenology of the grasslands. We hypothesized that these changes have resulted in significant differences in soil water–use patterns in the grasslands. We studied soil water depletion and recharge patterns of three grassland community types dominated by perennial grasses, annual grasses, or yellow starthistle with contrasting phenology and rooting depths for 4 yr. Soil moisture measurements were taken every month from March to December in 1998, 1999, and 2000 and every other month in 2001. Measurements were taken with a neutron probe at depths of 30 to 150 cm at 30-cm intervals. The results indicate that the yellow starthistle community maintained a significantly drier soil profile than the annual grass community. The perennial grass community maintained an intermediate soil water content that was not significantly different from either of the other two communities. Significant time by community and depth by community interactions indicated that the yellow starthistle community continued depleting soil moisture later into the season and at deeper depths than the other grass communities. This study demonstrates the effect of plant invasion on soil water recharge and depletion patterns in California grasslands.

Keywords

Yellow starthistle, Centaurea solstitialis L. CENSOCalifornia annual grasslandsecosystem changesplant invasions
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 52 , Issue 6 , December 2004 , pp. 929 - 935
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Beatley, J. C. 1966. Ecological status of introduced brome grasses (Bromus spp.) in desert vegetation of Southern Nevada. Ecology 47:548–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borman, M. M., Johnson, D. E., and Krueger, W. C. 1992. Soil moisture extraction by vegetation in a Mediterranean/maritime climatic regime. Agron. J 84:897–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, W. O., Snyder, R. L., Southard, S. B., and Lanini, B. J. 1997. Water Holding Characteristics of California Soils. Davis, CA: University of California Leaflet 21463. 92 pp.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, R. W. and Lonsdale, W. M. 1989. Alien vegetation and native biota in tropical Australia: the spread and impact of Mimosa pigra . Biol. Conserv 48:189–210.Google Scholar
Burcham, L. T. 1956. Historical backgrounds of range land use in California. J. Range Manage 9:81–86.Google Scholar
Burgy, R. H. 1968. Hydrological Studies and Watershed Management on Brushlands. Annual Report No. 8. Davis, CA: California Department of Water Resources and University of California Water Resources Center. 22 p.Google Scholar
D'Antonio, C. M. 2000. Fire, plant invasions, and global change. Pages 65–93 in Mooney, H. A. and Hobbs, R. J. eds. Invasive Species in a Changing World. Washington, DC: Island.Google Scholar
D'Antonio, C. M. and Vitousek, P. M. 1992. Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle and global change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst 23:63–87.Google Scholar
DiTomaso, J. M., Kyser, G. B., and Hastings, M. S. 1999a. Prescribed burning for control of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) and enhanced native plant diversity. Weed Sci 47:233–242.Google Scholar
DiTomaso, J. M., Kyser, G. B., Orloff, S. B., Enloe, S. F., and Nader, G. A. 1999b. New growth regulator herbicide provides excellent control of yellow starthistle. Calif. Agric 53:12–16.Google Scholar
DiTomaso, J. M., Kyser, G. B., and Pirosko, C. B. 2003. Effect of light and density on yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) root growth and soil moisture use. Weed Sci 51:334–341.Google Scholar
Dyer, A. R. and Rice, K. J. 1999. Effects of competition on resource availability and growth of a California bunchgrass. Ecology 80:2697–2710.Google Scholar
Gerlach, J. D. 2000. A Model Experimental System for Predicting the Invasion Success and Ecosystem Impacts of Non-Indigenous Summer-Flowering Annual Plants in California's Central Valley Grasslands and Oak Woodlands. . University of California, Davis, CA. 102 p.Google Scholar
Gerlach, J. D., Dyer, A. R., and Rice, K. J. 1998. Grassland and foothill woodland ecosystems of the central valley. Fremontia 26:39–43.Google Scholar
Gordon, D. R. and Rice, K. J. 1992. Partitioning of space and water between two California annual grassland species. Am. J. Bot 79:967–976.Google Scholar
Hamilton, J. G. 1997. Changing perceptions of pre-European grasslands in California. Madrono 44:311–333.Google Scholar
Holmes, T. H. and Rice, K. J. 1996. Patterns of growth and soil-water utilization in some exotic annuals and native perennial bunchgrasses of California. Ann. Bot 78:233–243.Google Scholar
Kay, B. L. and Street, J. E. 1961. Drilling wheatgrass into sprayed sagebrush in Northeastern California. J. Range Manage 14:271–273.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. C. 1968. Annual hydrologic response to watershed conversion from oak woodland to annual grassland. Water Resour. Res 4:59–72.Google Scholar
Mack, R. N., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, W. M., Evans, H., Clout, M., and Bazzaz, F. A. 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol. Appl 10:689–710.Google Scholar
Maddox, D. M. 1981. Introduction, Phenology, and Density of Yellow Starthistle in Coastal, Intercoastal, and Central Valley Situations in California. Oakland, CA: USDA-ARS, ARR-W-20, Pp. 1–33.Google Scholar
Pitcairn, M. J., O'Connell, R. A., and Gendron, J. M. 1998. Yellow starthistle: survey of statewide distribution. Pages 64–66 in Woods, D. M. ed. Biological Control Program Annual Summary, 1997. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Food and Agriculture, Plant Health and Pest Prevention Services.Google Scholar
Sakai, A. K., Allendorf, F. W., and Holt, J. S. et al. 2001. The population biology of invasive species. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst 32:305–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheley, R. and Larson, L. 1995. Interference between cheatgrass and yellow starthistle at three soil depths. J. Range Manage 48:392–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, G. and Hull, A. C. 1949. Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.)—an ecological intruder in Southern Idaho. Ecology 30:58–74.Google Scholar
Talbot, M. W., Biswell, H. W., and Hormay, A. L. 1939. Fluctuations in the annual vegetation of California. Ecology 20:394–402.Google Scholar
Veihmeyer, F. J. 1953. Use of water by native vegetation versus grasses and forbs on watersheds. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 34:201–212.Google Scholar
Vinall, H. N. and Westover, H. L. 1928. Bulbous bluegrass, Poa bulbosa . J. Am. Soc. Agron 20:394–399.Google Scholar
White, K. L. 1966. Old-field succession on Hastings reservation, California. Ecology 47:865–868.Google Scholar
Williamson, M. and Fitter, A. 1996. The varying success of invaders. Ecology 77:1661–1666.Google Scholar