Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T22:39:04.537Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comparison of Flumioxazin and Rimsulfuron Tank Mixtures for Weed Control in Potato

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Pamela J. S. Hutchinson
Pamela J. S. Hutchinson*
Affiliation:
Plant, Soil, and Entomological Sciences Department, University of Idaho, Aberdeen Research and Extension Center, Aberdeen, ID 83210
*
Author's E-mail: phutch@uidaho.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 2004 and 2005, field research was conducted in Idaho to compare tank mixtures of flumioxazin at the 53 g ai/ha potato use rate with comparable tank mixtures of rimsulfuron at 26 g ai/ha for broad-spectrum weed control. Flumioxazin in two-way tank mixtures with metribuzin, EPTC, pendimethalin, S-metolachlor, or ethalfluralin provided greater than 90% hairy nightshade control, which was comparable with control by similar rimsulfuron two-way tank mixtures. Flumioxazin plus metribuzin or rimsulfuron were the only two-way mixtures with flumioxazin consistently providing 90% or greater redroot pigweed, common lambsquarters, and green foxtail control. Control of these weeds by any of the rimsulfuron two-way mixtures was almost always greater than 90%. Three-way tank mixtures containing flumioxazin or rimsulfuron controlled hairy nightshade, redroot pigweed, and common lambsquarters similarly, and control ranged from 89 to 100%. When metribuzin was not included with flumioxazin in three-way mixtures, control was 80 to 97% and not always comparable with the 89 to 100% control by similar rimsulfuron mixtures. Green foxtail control by flumioxazin or rimsulfuron three-way mixtures usually was similar and greater than 90%.

Keywords

Flumioxazinrimsulfuroncommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. CHEALgreen foxtail, Setaria viridis L. SETVIhairy nightshade, Solanum sarrachoides Sendter SOLSAredroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. AMAREpotato, Solanum tuberosum L. ‘Russet Burbank’PREtank-mix partnerthree-way tank mixturestwo-way tank mixtures
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , December 2007 , pp. 1023 - 1028
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous 1991. United States standards of grade for potatoes. Pages 10. F.R. Doc. USDA, Ag Marketing Service. Reprinted 1997.Google Scholar
Anonymous 2003. Valor herbicide product label. Walnut Creek, CA Valent U.S.A. Corporation. 6.Google Scholar
Anonymous 2005a. Matrix product label. Wilmington, DE E.I. duPont de Nemours and Co., Inc. 14.Google Scholar
Anonymous 2005b. Valor SX herbicide product label. Walnut Creek, CA Valent U.S.A. Corporation. 10.Google Scholar
Anonymous 2006. Supplemental label Chateau herbicide WDG use on: potato. Walnut Creek, CA Valent U.S.A. Corporation. 2.Google Scholar
Askew, S. D., Wilcut, J. W., and Cranmer, J. R. 1999. Weed management in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with flumioxazin preemergence. Weed Technol. 13:594–598.Google Scholar
Askew, S. D., Wilcut, J. W., and Cranmer, J. R. 2002. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and weed response to flumioxazin applied preplant and postemergence directed. Weed Technol. 16:184–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brecke, B. J. and Stephenson, D. O. IV. 2006. Weed management in single- vs. twin-row peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 20:368–376.Google Scholar
Burke, I. C., Askew, S. D., and Wilcut, J. W. 2002. Flumioxazin systems for weed management in North Carolina peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 16:743–748.Google Scholar
Clewis, S. B., Askew, S. D., and Wilcut, J. W. 2002. Economic assessment of diclosulan and flumioxazin in strip- and conventional-tillage peanut. Weed Sci. 50:378–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, S. A., Carlsom, D. S., and York, A. C. 2005. Pre-plant control of cutleaf eveningprimrose (Oenothera laciniata Hill) and wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum L.) in conservation tillage cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). 2005. J. Cotton Sci. 9:223–228.Google Scholar
Dayan, F. E. and Duke, S. O. 1997. Phytotoxicity of protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitors: phenomenology, mode of action and mechanisms of resistance. Pages 11–36. in Roa, R.M., Burton, J.D., Kuhr, R.J. eds. Herbicide Activity: Toxicology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Burke, VA IOS Press.Google Scholar
Grey, T. S., Bridges, D. C., Eastin, E. F., and Macdonald, G. E. 2002. Influence of flumioxazin and herbicide on weed control in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Peanut Sci. 29:24–29.Google Scholar
Grey, T. S., Bridges, D. C., Hancock, H. G., and Davis, J. W. 2004. Influence of sulfentrazone rate and application method on peanut weed control. Weed Technol. 18:619–625.Google Scholar
Grey, T. L. and Wehtje, G. R. 2005. Residual herbicide weed control systems in peanut. Weed Technol. 19:560–567.Google Scholar
Grichar, W. J. and Colburn, A. E. 1996. Flumioxazin for weed control in Texas peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Peanut Sci. 23:30–36.Google Scholar
Guttieri, M. J. and Eberlein, C. V. 1997. Preemergence weed control in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) with rimsulfuron mixtures. Weed Technol. 11:755–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, J., Liu, H., Guo, P., and Hao, C. 2002. Weed control in summer-sown soybeans with flumioxazin plus acetochlor and flumiclorac-pentyl plus clethodim. Weed Biol. Manage. 2:120–122.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, P. J. S., Boydston, R. A., Ransom, C. V., Tonks, D. J., and Beutler, B. R. 2005a. Potato variety tolerance to flumioxazin and sulfentrazone. Weed Technol. 19:683–696.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, P. J. S. and Eberlein, C. V. 2003. Weed management. Pages 241–283. in Stark, J.C., Love, S.L. eds. Potato Production Systems. Moscow, ID University of Idaho Agricultural Communications.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, P. J. S., Eberlein, C. V., Kral, C. W., and Guttieri, M. J. 2006. Matrix in weed management systems for potatoes. CIS 1037. Moscow, ID University of Idaho Educational Communications. 8.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, P. J. S., Ransom, C. V., Boydston, R. A., and Beutler, B. R. 2005b. Dimethenamid-P: efficacy and potato (Solanum tuberosum) variety tolerance. Weed Technol. 19:966–971.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, P. J. S., Tonks, D. J., and Beutler, B. R. 2003. Efficacy and economics of weed control programs in glyphosate-resistant potato (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Technol. 17:854–865.Google Scholar
Kelly, S. T., Shankle, M. W., and Miller, D. K. 2006. Efficacy and tolerance of flumioxazin on sweetpotato (Ipomoea batata). Weed Technol. 20:334–339.Google Scholar
Main, C. L., Treadaway Ducar, J., Whitley, E. P., and Macdonald, G. E. 2005. Weed management in southeastern peanut with diclosulam and flumioxazin. 19:870–874.Google Scholar
Niekamp, J. W., Johnson, W. G., and Smeda, R. J. 1999. Broadleaf control with sulfentrazone and flumioxazin in no-tillage soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13:233–238.Google Scholar
Price, A. J., Wilcut, J. W., and Cranmer, J. R. 2002. Flumioxazin preplant burndown weed management in strip-till cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) planted into wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol. 16:762–767.Google Scholar
Price, A. J., Wilcut, J. W., and Cranmer, J. R. 2004. Flumioxazin preplant or POST-directed application timing followed by irrigation at emergence or after POST-directed spray treatment does not influence cotton yield. Weed Technol. 18:310–314.Google Scholar
Richardson, R. J., Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 2007. Preemergence herbicides followed by trifloxysulfuron postemergence in cotton. Weed Technol. 21:1–6.Google Scholar
Richardson, R. J. and Zandstra, B. H. 2006. Evaluation of flumioxazin and other herbicides for weed control in gladiolus. Weed Technol. 20:394–398.Google Scholar
Robinson, B. L., Clewis, S. B., and Wilcut, J. W. 2006. Weed management with flumioxazin in strip-tillage peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Peanut Sci. 33:41–46.Google Scholar
Scott, G. H., Askew, S. D., and Wilcut, J. W. 2001. Economic evaluation of diclosulam and flumioxazin systems in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 15:360–364.Google Scholar
Scott, G. H., Askew, S. D., Wilcut, J. W., and Bennett, A. C. 2002. Economic evaluation of HADSS™ computer program in North Carolina peanut. Weed Sci. 50:91–100.Google Scholar
Taylor-Lovell, S., Wax, L. M., and Bollero, G. 2002. Preemergence flumioxazin and pendimethalin and postemergence herbicide systems for soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 16:502–511.Google Scholar
Tonks, D. J., Eberlein, C. V., and Guttieri, M. J. 2000. Preemergence control in potato (Solanum tuberosum) with ethalfluralin. Weed Technol. 14:287–292.Google Scholar
Vencill, W. K. 2002. Flumioxazin. Pages 200–202. in. Herbicide Handbook. 8th ed. Lawrence, KS Weed Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. E., Nissen, S. J., and Thompson, A. 2002. Potato (Solanum tuberosum) variety and weed response to sulfentrazone and flumioxazin. Weed Technol. 16:567–574.Google Scholar